Literature DB >> 27080487

Identifying variation in models of care for the genomic-based diagnosis of inherited retinal dystrophies in the United Kingdom.

M Eden1, K Payne1, C Jones1, S J Wright1, G Hall2,3, M McAllister4, G Black2,3.   

Abstract

PurposeAdvances in genomic technologies are prompting a realignment of diagnostic and management pathways for rare inherited disease. New models of care are being developed as genomic-based diagnostic testing becomes increasingly relevant within more and more aspects of medicine. This study describes current care models for the provision of a genomic-based diagnosis for patients with inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD) in UK clinical practice.MethodsA structured telephone survey, conducted (in 2014) with all 23 UK Regional Genetics Centres and a sample of specialist ophthalmology centres (n=4), was used to describe models of service delivery and current levels of genomic-based diagnostic testing. Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics. Responses to open-ended questions were summarised using thematic analysis.ResultsOf the 27 centres 10 of them saw IRD patients in 'generic' clinics and 17 centres offered ophthalmic-specific clinics. Extensive regional variation was observed in numbers of patients seen and in how care for the diagnosis and management of IRD was provided.ConclusionsUnderstanding current practice is a necessary first step in the development and evaluation of complex interventions, such as care models for the genomic-based diagnosis of inherited eye conditions. Presented findings here relating to disparities in care provision are potentially linked to previously reported evidence of perceived unmet needs and expectations of IRD service users. This work provides a foundation for the integration of new care models in mainstream medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27080487      PMCID: PMC4941073          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2016.74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  9 in total

1.  Treatment possibilities for retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Samuel G Jacobson; Artur V Cideciyan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.

Authors:  Robert Resta; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Robin L Bennett; Sandra Blum; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Michelle N Strecker; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  A paradigm shift in the delivery of services for diagnosis of inherited retinal disease.

Authors:  James O'Sullivan; Brendan G Mullaney; Sanjeev S Bhaskar; Jonathan E Dickerson; Georgina Hall; Anna O'Grady; Andrew Webster; Simon C Ramsden; Graeme C Black
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Variation in healthcare services for specialist genetic testing and implications for planning genetic services: the example of inherited retinal dystrophy in the English NHS.

Authors:  Mark Harrison; Stephen Birch; Martin Eden; Simon Ramsden; Tracey Farragher; Katherine Payne; Georgina Hall; Graeme Cm Black
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-01-09

5.  Valuing the benefits of genetic testing for retinitis pigmentosa: a pilot application of the contingent valuation method.

Authors:  Martin Eden; Katherine Payne; Ryan M Combs; Georgina Hall; Marion McAllister; Graeme C M Black
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 6.  Genetic testing for inherited ocular disease: delivering on the promise at last?

Authors:  Rachel L Gillespie; Georgina Hall; Graeme C Black
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  Understanding the expectations of patients with inherited retinal dystrophies.

Authors:  Ryan Combs; Georgina Hall; Katherine Payne; Jo Lowndes; Sophie Devery; Susan M Downes; Anthony T Moore; Simon Ramsden; Graeme C M Black; Marion McAllister
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Understanding the impact of genetic testing for inherited retinal dystrophy.

Authors:  Ryan Combs; Marion McAllister; Katherine Payne; Jo Lowndes; Sophie Devery; Andrew R Webster; Susan M Downes; Anthony T Moore; Simon Ramsden; Graeme Black; Georgina Hall
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.

Authors:  Peter Craig; Paul Dieppe; Sally Macintyre; Susan Michie; Irwin Nazareth; Mark Petticrew
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-09-29
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Developing new frameworks to value genomic information: accounting for complexity.

Authors:  Martin Eden
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Target 5000: a standardized all-Ireland pathway for the diagnosis and management of inherited retinal degenerations.

Authors:  Kirk A J Stephenson; Julia Zhu; Niamh Wynne; Adrian Dockery; Rebecca M Cairns; Emma Duignan; Laura Whelan; Conor P Malone; Hilary Dempsey; Karen Collins; Shana Routledge; Rajiv Pandey; Elaine Crossan; Jacqueline Turner; James J O'Byrne; Laura Brady; Giuliana Silvestri; Paul F Kenna; G Jane Farrar; David J Keegan
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 4.123

3.  Exploring the feasibility of delivering standardized genomic care using ophthalmology as an example.

Authors:  Niall Davison; Katherine Payne; Martin Eden; Marion McAllister; Stephen A Roberts; Stuart Ingram; Graeme C M Black; Georgina Hall
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 8.822

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.