Literature DB >> 25567483

Variation in healthcare services for specialist genetic testing and implications for planning genetic services: the example of inherited retinal dystrophy in the English NHS.

Mark Harrison1, Stephen Birch, Martin Eden, Simon Ramsden, Tracey Farragher, Katherine Payne, Georgina Hall, Graeme Cm Black.   

Abstract

This study aims to identify and quantify the extent of current variation in service provision of a genetic testing service for dominant and X-linked retinal dystrophies in the English National Health Service (NHS). National audit data (all test requests and results (n = 1839) issued between 2003 and 2011) and survey of English regional genetic testing services were used. Age- and gender-adjusted standardised testing rates were calculated using indirect standardisation, and survey responses were transcribed verbatim and data collated and summarised. The cumulative incidence rate of testing in England was 4.5 per 100,000 population for males and 2.6 per 100,000 population for females. The standardised testing rate (STR) varied widely between regions of England, being particularly low in the North-east (STR 0.485), with half as many tests as expected based on the size and demographic distribution of the population and high in the South-east (STR 1.355), with 36 % more tests than expected. Substantial and significantly different rates of testing were found between regional populations. Specific policy mechanisms to promote, monitor and evaluate the regional distribution of access to genetic and genomic testing are required. However, commissioners will require information on the scope and role of genetic services and the population at risk of the conditions for which patients are tested.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 25567483      PMCID: PMC4356672          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-014-0210-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  18 in total

Review 1.  Gene therapeutic approaches for dominant retinopathies.

Authors:  G Jane Farrar; Arpad Palfi; Mary O'Reilly
Journal:  Curr Gene Ther       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.391

2.  A paradigm shift in the delivery of services for diagnosis of inherited retinal disease.

Authors:  James O'Sullivan; Brendan G Mullaney; Sanjeev S Bhaskar; Jonathan E Dickerson; Georgina Hall; Anna O'Grady; Andrew Webster; Simon C Ramsden; Graeme C Black
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Next-generation sequencing for clinical diagnostics.

Authors:  Howard J Jacob
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Next-generation sequencing (NGS) as a diagnostic tool for retinal degeneration reveals a much higher detection rate in early-onset disease.

Authors:  Morag E Shanks; Susan M Downes; Richard R Copley; Stefano Lise; John Broxholme; Karl Az Hudspith; Alexandra Kwasniewska; Wayne Il Davies; Mark W Hankins; Emily R Packham; Penny Clouston; Anneke Seller; Andrew Om Wilkie; Jenny C Taylor; Jiannis Ragoussis; Andrea H Németh
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume II--The design and analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  N E Breslow; N E Day
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1987

Review 6.  Next-generation sequencing in the clinic: are we ready?

Authors:  Leslie G Biesecker; Wylie Burke; Isaac Kohane; Sharon E Plon; Ron Zimmern
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Age-dependent effects of RPE65 gene therapy for Leber's congenital amaurosis: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial.

Authors:  Albert M Maguire; Katherine A High; Alberto Auricchio; J Fraser Wright; Eric A Pierce; Francesco Testa; Federico Mingozzi; Jeannette L Bennicelli; Gui-shuang Ying; Settimio Rossi; Ann Fulton; Kathleen A Marshall; Sandro Banfi; Daniel C Chung; Jessica I W Morgan; Bernd Hauck; Olga Zelenaia; Xiaosong Zhu; Leslie Raffini; Frauke Coppieters; Elfride De Baere; Kenneth S Shindler; Nicholas J Volpe; Enrico M Surace; Carmela Acerra; Arkady Lyubarsky; T Michael Redmond; Edwin Stone; Junwei Sun; Jennifer Wellman McDonnell; Bart P Leroy; Francesca Simonelli; Jean Bennett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Understanding the expectations of patients with inherited retinal dystrophies.

Authors:  Ryan Combs; Georgina Hall; Katherine Payne; Jo Lowndes; Sophie Devery; Susan M Downes; Anthony T Moore; Simon Ramsden; Graeme C M Black; Marion McAllister
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Understanding of and attitudes to genetic testing for inherited retinal disease: a patient perspective.

Authors:  T A Willis; B Potrata; M Ahmed; J Hewison; R Gale; L Downey; M McKibbin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Retinal gene therapy in patients with choroideremia: initial findings from a phase 1/2 clinical trial.

Authors:  Robert E MacLaren; Markus Groppe; Alun R Barnard; Charles L Cottriall; Tanya Tolmachova; Len Seymour; K Reed Clark; Matthew J During; Frans P M Cremers; Graeme C M Black; Andrew J Lotery; Susan M Downes; Andrew R Webster; Miguel C Seabra
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  7 in total

1.  Identifying variation in models of care for the genomic-based diagnosis of inherited retinal dystrophies in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  M Eden; K Payne; C Jones; S J Wright; G Hall; M McAllister; G Black
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Rare disease care pathways in the EU: from odysseys and labyrinths towards highways.

Authors:  Birute Tumiene; Holm Graessner
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-03-18

3.  Developing new frameworks to value genomic information: accounting for complexity.

Authors:  Martin Eden
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 4.  A systematic review of geographical inequities for accessing clinical genomic and genetic services for non-cancer related rare disease.

Authors:  Stephanie Best; Nada Vidic; Kim An; Felicity Collins; Susan M White
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.351

5.  The economic case for precision medicine.

Authors:  Sean P Gavan; Alexander J Thompson; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2018-01-08

6.  Target 5000: a standardized all-Ireland pathway for the diagnosis and management of inherited retinal degenerations.

Authors:  Kirk A J Stephenson; Julia Zhu; Niamh Wynne; Adrian Dockery; Rebecca M Cairns; Emma Duignan; Laura Whelan; Conor P Malone; Hilary Dempsey; Karen Collins; Shana Routledge; Rajiv Pandey; Elaine Crossan; Jacqueline Turner; James J O'Byrne; Laura Brady; Giuliana Silvestri; Paul F Kenna; G Jane Farrar; David J Keegan
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 4.123

7.  Exploring the feasibility of delivering standardized genomic care using ophthalmology as an example.

Authors:  Niall Davison; Katherine Payne; Martin Eden; Marion McAllister; Stephen A Roberts; Stuart Ingram; Graeme C M Black; Georgina Hall
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 8.822

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.