Literature DB >> 27079194

Bifurcation-based approach reveals synergism and optimal combinatorial perturbation.

Yanwei Liu1, Shanshan Li1, Zengrong Liu1, Ruiqi Wang2.   

Abstract

Cells accomplish the process of fate decisions and form terminal lineages through a series of binary choices in which cells switch stable states from one branch to another as the interacting strengths of regulatory factors continuously vary. Various combinatorial effects may occur because almost all regulatory processes are managed in a combinatorial fashion. Combinatorial regulation is crucial for cell fate decisions because it may effectively integrate many different signaling pathways to meet the higher regulation demand during cell development. However, whether the contribution of combinatorial regulation to the state transition is better than that of a single one and if so, what the optimal combination strategy is, seem to be significant issue from the point of view of both biology and mathematics. Using the approaches of combinatorial perturbations and bifurcation analysis, we provide a general framework for the quantitative analysis of synergism in molecular networks. Different from the known methods, the bifurcation-based approach depends only on stable state responses to stimuli because the state transition induced by combinatorial perturbations occurs between stable states. More importantly, an optimal combinatorial perturbation strategy can be determined by investigating the relationship between the bifurcation curve of a synergistic perturbation pair and the level set of a specific objective function. The approach is applied to two models, i.e., a theoretical multistable decision model and a biologically realistic CREB model, to show its validity, although the approach holds for a general class of biological systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bifurcation; Cell fate decisions; Combinatorial perturbations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27079194      PMCID: PMC4942421          DOI: 10.1007/s10867-016-9414-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Phys        ISSN: 0092-0606            Impact factor:   1.365


  38 in total

1.  Analysis of drug interactions.

Authors:  Irene V Bijnsdorp; Elisa Giovannetti; Godefridus J Peters
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Function and regulation of CREB family transcription factors in the nervous system.

Authors:  Bonnie E Lonze; David D Ginty
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Modeling bistable cell-fate choices in the Drosophila eye: qualitative and quantitative perspectives.

Authors:  Thomas G W Graham; S M Ali Tabei; Aaron R Dinner; Ilaria Rebay
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 4.  Molecular regulation of the mitosis/meiosis decision in multicellular organisms.

Authors:  Judith Kimble
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Neural fate decisions mediated by trans-activation and cis-inhibition in Notch signaling.

Authors:  Ruiqi Wang; Kaihui Liu; Luonan Chen; Kazuyuki Aihara
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Multiplexed and programmable regulation of gene networks with an integrated RNA and CRISPR/Cas toolkit in human cells.

Authors:  Lior Nissim; Samuel D Perli; Alexandra Fridkin; Pablo Perez-Pinera; Timothy K Lu
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Combined hydrogels that switch human pluripotent stem cells from self-renewal to differentiation.

Authors:  James E Dixon; Disheet A Shah; Catherine Rogers; Stephen Hall; Nicola Weston; Christopher D J Parmenter; Donal McNally; Chris Denning; Kevin M Shakesheff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Chemical combination effects predict connectivity in biological systems.

Authors:  Joseph Lehár; Grant R Zimmermann; Andrew S Krueger; Raymond A Molnar; Jebediah T Ledell; Adrian M Heilbut; Glenn F Short; Leanne C Giusti; Garry P Nolan; Omar A Magid; Margaret S Lee; Alexis A Borisy; Brent R Stockwell; Curtis T Keith
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 11.429

9.  Synergistic and antagonistic drug combinations depend on network topology.

Authors:  Ning Yin; Wenzhe Ma; Jianfeng Pei; Qi Ouyang; Chao Tang; Luhua Lai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Models from experiments: combinatorial drug perturbations of cancer cells.

Authors:  Sven Nelander; Weiqing Wang; Björn Nilsson; Qing-Bai She; Christine Pratilas; Neal Rosen; Peter Gennemark; Chris Sander
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  2 in total

1.  Fate decisions mediated by crosstalk of autophagy and apoptosis in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Zhen Ge; Ruiqi Wang
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 1.365

2.  Screening drug target combinations in disease-related molecular networks.

Authors:  Min Luo; Jianfeng Jiao; Ruiqi Wang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.169

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.