Literature DB >> 21516426

Analysis of drug interactions.

Irene V Bijnsdorp1, Elisa Giovannetti, Godefridus J Peters.   

Abstract

Most of the current therapies against cancer, and also those against immune diseases or viral infections, consist of empirically designed combination strategies, combining a variety of therapeutic agents. Drug combinations are widely used because multiple drugs affect multiple targets and cell subpopulations. The primary aim is a mutual enhancement of the therapeutic effects, while other benefits may include decreased side effects and the delay or prevention of drug resistance. The large majority of combination regimens are being developed empirically and there are few experimental studies designed to explore thoroughly different drug combinations, using appropriate methods of analysis. However, the study of patterns of possible metabolic and biological interactions in preclinical models, as well as scheduling, should improve the development of most drug combinations. The definition of synergism is that the combination is more effective than each agent separately, e.g., one of the agents augments the actions of the second drug. The definition of antagonism is that the combination is less effective than the single agents, e.g. one of the agents counteracts the actions of the other. A combination can be studied by combining the two agents in various different ways, such as simultaneous or sequential combination schedules. It is essential to test the potency of a combination, before evaluation in the clinic, to prevent antagonistic actions. However, one should realize that an antagonistic action may be desired when toxicity is concerned, i.e. one drug decreases the side effects of another drug. Several attempts have been made to quantitatively measure the dose-effect relationship of each drug alone and its combinations and to determine whether a given combination would gain a synergistic effect. One of the most widely used ways to evaluate whether a combination is effective is the median-drug effect analysis method. Using this method, a combination index (CI) is calculated from drug cytotoxicity or growth inhibition curves. To calculate a CI, the computer software Calcusyn can be used, taking the entire shape of the growth inhibition curve into account for calculating whether a combination is synergistic, additive, or antagonistic. Here, we describe how combinations can be designed in vitro and how to analyze them using Calcusyn or Compusyn. Moreover, pitfalls, limitations, and advantages of using these combinations and Calcusyn/Compusyn are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21516426     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-080-5_34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  76 in total

1.  RNA interference screening identifies lenalidomide sensitizers in multiple myeloma, including RSK2.

Authors:  Yuan Xiao Zhu; Hongwei Yin; Laura A Bruins; Chang-Xin Shi; Patrick Jedlowski; Meraj Aziz; Chris Sereduk; Klaus Martin Kortuem; Jessica E Schmidt; Mia Champion; Esteban Braggio; A Keith Stewart
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Antinociceptive interaction of gabapentin with minocycline in murine diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  H F Miranda; F Sierralta; V Jorquera; P Poblete; J C Prieto; V Noriega
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.473

3.  Real-Time Cell Migration Monitoring to Analyze Drug Synergism in the Scratch Assay Using the IncuCyte System.

Authors:  Dennis Kobelt; Wolfgang Walther; Ulrike S Stein
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Gemcitabine and Chk1 Inhibitor AZD7762 Synergistically Suppress the Growth of Lkb1-Deficient Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Yuyang Li; Xiaoen Wang; Feiyang Liu; Peng Gao; Max M Quinn; Fei Li; Ashley A Merlino; Cyril Benes; Qingsong Liu; Nathanael S Gray; Kwok-Kin Wong
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Bifurcation-based approach reveals synergism and optimal combinatorial perturbation.

Authors:  Yanwei Liu; Shanshan Li; Zengrong Liu; Ruiqi Wang
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 1.365

6.  Inhibition of cellular STAT3 synergizes with the cytomegalovirus kinase inhibitor maribavir to disrupt infection.

Authors:  Justin M Reitsma; Scott S Terhune
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 5.970

7.  Inhibition of γ-secretase activity synergistically enhances tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand induced apoptosis in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells via upregulation of death receptor 5.

Authors:  Lisa M Greene; Seema M Nathwani; Daniela M Zisterer
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Antitumor action of CDK inhibitor LS-007 as a single agent and in combination with ABT-199 against human acute leukemia cells.

Authors:  Shao Xie; Hui Jiang; Xiao-Wen Zhai; Fan Wei; Shu-Dong Wang; Jian Ding; Yi Chen
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Simulations suggest pharmacological methods for rescuing long-term potentiation.

Authors:  Paul Smolen; Douglas A Baxter; John H Byrne
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Palbociclib treatment of FLT3-ITD+ AML cells uncovers a kinase-dependent transcriptional regulation of FLT3 and PIM1 by CDK6.

Authors:  Iris Z Uras; Gina J Walter; Ruth Scheicher; Florian Bellutti; Michaela Prchal-Murphy; Anca S Tigan; Peter Valent; Florian H Heidel; Stefan Kubicek; Claudia Scholl; Stefan Fröhling; Veronika Sexl
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.