Literature DB >> 27078712

NET Blood Transcript Analysis Defines the Crossing of the Clinical Rubicon: When Stable Disease Becomes Progressive.

Marianne Pavel1, Henning Jann, Vikas Prasad, Ignat Drozdov, Irvin M Modlin, Mark Kidd.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A key issue in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) is early identification and prediction of disease progression. Clinical evaluation and imaging are limited due to the lack of sensitivity and disease indolence. We assessed the NETest as a predictive and prognostic marker of progression in a long-term follow-up study.
METHODS: GEP-NETs (n = 34) followed for a median 4 years (2.2-5.4) were evaluated. WHO tumor grade/stage grade 1: n = 17, grade 2: n = 14, grade 3: n = 1 (for 2, no grade was available); 31 (91%) were stage IV. Baseline and longitudinal imaging and blood biomarkers were available in all, and progression was defined per standard clinical protocols (RECIST 1.0). The NETest was measured by quantitative PCR of blood and multianalyte algorithmic analysis (disease activity scaled 0-100% with low <40% and high activity risk cutoffs >80%); chromogranin A (CgA) was measured by radioimmunoassay (normal <150 µg/l); progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed by Cox proportional-hazard regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis.
RESULTS: At baseline, 100% were NETest positive, and CgA was elevated in 50%. The only baseline variable (Cox modeling) associated with PFS was NETest (hazard ratio = 1.022, 95% confidence interval = 1.005-1.04; p < 0.012). Using Kaplan-Meier analyses, the baseline NETest (>80%) was significantly associated (p = 0.01) with disease progression (median PFS 0.68 vs. 2.78 years with <40% levels). The NETest was more informative (96%) than CgA changes (<under>></under>25%) in consistently predicting disease alterations (40%, p < 2 × 10-5, χ2 = 18). The NETest had an earlier time point change than imaging (1.02 ± 0.15 years). Baseline NETest levels >40% in stable disease were 100% prognostic of disease progression versus CgA (χ2 = 5, p < 0.03). Baseline NETest values <40% accurately (100%) predicted stability over 5 years (p = 0.05, χ2 = 3.8 vs. CgA).
CONCLUSION: The NETest correlated with a well-differentiated GEP-NET clinical status. The NETest has predictive and prognostic utility for GEP-NETs identifying clinically actionable alterations ∼1 year before image-based evidence of progression.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27078712     DOI: 10.1159/000446025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroendocrinology        ISSN: 0028-3835            Impact factor:   4.914


  33 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A review of serum biomarkers, staging, and management.

Authors:  Zu-Yi Ma; Yuan-Feng Gong; Hong-Kai Zhuang; Zi-Xuan Zhou; Shan-Zhou Huang; Yi-Ping Zou; Bo-Wen Huang; Zhong-Hai Sun; Chuan-Zhao Zhang; Yun-Qiang Tang; Bao-Hua Hou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Clinical applications of (epi)genetics in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Moving towards liquid biopsies.

Authors:  Gitta Boons; Timon Vandamme; Marc Peeters; Guy Van Camp; Ken Op de Beeck
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 3.  Molecular strategies in the management of bronchopulmonary and thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Irvin M Modlin; Mark Kidd; Pier-Luigi Filosso; Matteo Roffinella; Anna Lewczuk; Jaroslaw Cwikla; Lisa Bodei; Agnieska Kolasinska-Cwikla; Kyung-Min Chung; Margot E Tesselaar; Ignat A Drozdov
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  The Treatment Landscape and New Opportunities of Molecular Targeted Therapies in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Fabiola Amair-Pinedo; Ignacio Matos; Tamara Saurí; Jorge Hernando; Jaume Capdevila
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.493

5.  Assessment of NETest Clinical Utility in a U.S. Registry-Based Study.

Authors:  Eric Liu; Scott Paulson; Anthony Gulati; Jon Freudman; William Grosh; Sheldon Kafer; Prasanna C Wickremesinghe; Ronald R Salem; Lisa Bodei
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-29

Review 6.  Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.512

7.  Role of chromogranin A-derived fragments after resection of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  V Andreasi; S Partelli; M F Manzoni; F Muffatti; L Di Filippo; S Crippa; A Corti; M Falconi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 8.  Neuroendocrine neoplasia of the gastrointestinal tract revisited: towards precision medicine.

Authors:  Guido Rindi; Bertram Wiedenmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 43.330

9.  PRRT neuroendocrine tumor response monitored using circulating transcript analysis: the NETest.

Authors:  Lisa Bodei; Mark S Kidd; Aviral Singh; Wouter A van der Zwan; Stefano Severi; Ignat A Drozdov; Anna Malczewska; Richard P Baum; Dik J Kwekkeboom; Giovanni Paganelli; Eric P Krenning; Irvin M Modlin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Circulating Neuroendocrine Gene Transcripts (NETest): A Postoperative Strategy for Early Identification of the Efficacy of Radical Surgery for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Stefano Partelli; Valentina Andreasi; Francesca Muffatti; Marco Schiavo Lena; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.