J Nguyen1, M Cascione2, S Noori1. 1. Division of Neonatology and the Center for Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles and the LAC+USC Medical Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 2. UCLA School of Law, University California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is becoming increasingly available for neonatologists and pediatric subspecialists (PSS); however, concerns over potential litigation from possible missed diagnoses or incorrect management have been documented. This study aims to define the extent and quality of lawsuits filed against neonatologists and PSS related to POCUS. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective study of all United States reported state and federal cases in the Westlaw database from January 1990 through October 2015. Cases were reviewed and included if either a neonatologist or PSS were accused of misconduct or the interpretation or failure to perform an ultrasound/echocardiogram was discussed. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the data. RESULTS: Our search criteria returned 468 results; 2 cases were determined to be relevant to the study objective. The two cases alleged a failure to perform a diagnostic test and implicated POCUS as an option. There were no cases of neonatologists and PSS being sued for POCUS performance or interpretation. CONCLUSION: This study of a major legal database suggests that POCUS use and interpretation is not a significant cause of lawsuits against neonatologists and PSS.
OBJECTIVE: Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is becoming increasingly available for neonatologists and pediatric subspecialists (PSS); however, concerns over potential litigation from possible missed diagnoses or incorrect management have been documented. This study aims to define the extent and quality of lawsuits filed against neonatologists and PSS related to POCUS. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective study of all United States reported state and federal cases in the Westlaw database from January 1990 through October 2015. Cases were reviewed and included if either a neonatologist or PSS were accused of misconduct or the interpretation or failure to perform an ultrasound/echocardiogram was discussed. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the data. RESULTS: Our search criteria returned 468 results; 2 cases were determined to be relevant to the study objective. The two cases alleged a failure to perform a diagnostic test and implicated POCUS as an option. There were no cases of neonatologists and PSS being sued for POCUS performance or interpretation. CONCLUSION: This study of a major legal database suggests that POCUS use and interpretation is not a significant cause of lawsuits against neonatologists and PSS.
Authors: Nick Evans; Veronique Gournay; Fernando Cabanas; Martin Kluckow; Tina Leone; Alan Groves; Patrick McNamara; Luc Mertens Journal: Semin Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: T M Scalea; A Rodriguez; W C Chiu; F D Brenneman; W F Fallon; K Kato; M G McKenney; M L Nerlich; M G Ochsner; H Yoshii Journal: J Trauma Date: 1999-03
Authors: Raoul Breitkreutz; Susanna Price; Holger V Steiger; Florian H Seeger; Hendrik Ilper; Hanns Ackermann; Marcus Rudolph; Shahana Uddin; Markus A Weigand; Edgar Müller; Felix Walcher Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Aron Kandinov; Sean Mutchnick; Vaibhuv Nangia; Peter F Svider; Giancarlo F Zuliani; Mahdi A Shkoukani; Michael A Carron Journal: JAMA Facial Plast Surg Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 4.611
Authors: Elsa A van Wassenaer; Joost G Daams; Marc A Benninga; Karen Rosendahl; Bart G P Koot; Samuel Stafrace; Owen J Arthurs; Rick R van Rijn Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2021-04-10
Authors: Yogen Singh; Charles Christoph Roehr; Cecile Tissot; Sheryle Rogerson; Samir Gupta; Kajsa Bohlin; Morten Breindahl; Afif El-Khuffash; Willem P de Boode Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 3.756