Literature DB >> 27078004

Evolution Profiles of Different Corneal Parameters in Progressive Keratoconus.

Joy Tellouck1, David Touboul, Marcony R Santhiago, Laury Tellouck, Clement Paya, David Smadja.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the evolution profiles of several corneal topographic and tomographic parameters in progressive keratoconus and compare them with the kinetics of evolution of anterior keratometry.
METHODS: One hundred nine eyes of 55 patients were prospectively enrolled and followed up every 3 months for at least 1 year. Forty-five corneal parameters were measured at each visit using a combined Placido-based and dual Scheimpflug imaging system. Percentage of progression between each visit was calculated for each parameter and comparisons were tested between the different variables.
RESULTS: At 1 year, 11% (12/109) of eyes progressed with an increase in maximum anterior keratometry of 1 D or more. Among these eyes, the posterior maximum keratometry and vertical corneal coma had a significantly higher percentage of progression (P < 0.05) than the maximum anterior keratometry, 5.9%, 27%, and 3.2%, respectively, and occurred significantly earlier than the modifications of the anterior keratometry, at the third-, sixth-, and 12th-month visits, for vertical corneal coma, posterior keratometry, and anterior keratometry respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Modifications of the posterior surface and corneal vertical coma occurred earlier and were detectable before changes in the anterior keratometry readings in eyes with progressive keratoconus. These parameters may be relevant warning signs when monitoring progressive keratoconus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27078004     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  6 in total

1.  Distinguishing Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus Eyes Using Dual Scheimpflug/Placido Analysis.

Authors:  Oren Golan; Andre L Piccinini; Eric S Hwang; Ildamaris Montes De Oca Gonzalez; Mark Krauthammer; Sumitra S Khandelwal; David Smadja; J Bradley Randleman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Comparing the natural progression and clinical features of keratoconus between pediatric and adult patients.

Authors:  Ken-Kuo Lin; Yun-Wen Chen; Chun-Ting Yeh; Pei-Ru Li; Jiahn-Shing Lee; Chiun-Ho Hou; Ching-Hsi Hsiao; Lai-Chu See
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Comparison of corneal tomography using a novel swept-source optical coherence tomographer and rotating Scheimpflug system in normal and keratoconus eyes: repeatability and agreement analysis.

Authors:  Robert Herber; Janine Lenk; Lutz E Pillunat; Frederik Raiskup
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-23

4.  The impact of hybrid contact lenses on keratoconus progression after accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking.

Authors:  Mehmet Gökhan Aslan; Hüseyin Fındık; Murat Okutucu; Emre Aydın; Feyzahan Uzun
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 5.  Galilei Corneal Tomography for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part II.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Mahsaw N Motlagh; Michael S Murri; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2019

6.  Superiority of Baseline Biomechanical Properties over Corneal Tomography in Predicting Keratoconus Progression

Authors:  Mehmet Akif Erol; Eray Atalay; Onur Özalp; Abdullah Divarcı; Nilgün Yıldırım
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.