Literature DB >> 27077989

Group therapy as a social context for aphasia recovery: a pilot, observational study in an acute rehabilitation hospital.

Mackenzie E Fama1,2, Christine R Baron1, Brooke Hatfield1, Peter E Turkeltaub1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individuals with aphasia often receive therapy from a speech-language pathologist during acute rehabilitation. The literature demonstrates that group-based therapy provides a natural, social environment for language rehabilitation in mild-moderate and/or chronic aphasia; however, the communication of persons with acute, severe non-fluent aphasia during group treatment has not been fully explored.
OBJECTIVE: This observational study investigated patient communication during acute rehabilitation. The primary objective was to determine whether participants initiate more communication during group therapy sessions when compared to individual therapy sessions.
METHOD: Ten participants with severe non-fluent aphasia were observed during one individual and one group session during their stay in an acute, inpatient rehabilitation facility. Communicative initiations were tallied and categorized based on type, target, and purpose.
RESULTS: Participants initiated communication more often during group sessions than during individual sessions. During groups, participants used more vocalizations and facial expressions to communicate, and the purpose was more often for social closeness than in individual sessions. Participants produced fewer different, real words in group vs. individual sessions, but other measures of communication skill did not differ significantly between the two settings.
CONCLUSION: In the aphasia group treatment described in this study, participants initiated more communication, with greater diversity of expressive modalities and more varied communicative purposes. Participants in group therapy also showed an increased tendency to communicate for the purpose of social closeness. These findings suggest that there are important differences in the communication of patients participating in group vs. individual speech therapy for treatment of acute, severe non-fluent aphasia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute rehabilitation; Adults; Aphasia; Group therapy; Intervention; Language disorders; Outcomes; Service delivery; Social communication

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27077989      PMCID: PMC4949973          DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1155277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil        ISSN: 1074-9357            Impact factor:   2.119


  6 in total

1.  The efficacy of group communication treatment in adults with chronic aphasia.

Authors:  R J Elman; E Bernstein-Ellis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Engagement in group therapy for aphasia.

Authors:  Nina Simmons-Mackie; Jack S Damico
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 1.761

Review 3.  Treatment of poststroke aphasia: current practice and new directions.

Authors:  Mackenzie E Fama; Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.420

4.  Veterans Administration cooperative study on aphasia: a comparison of individual and group treatment.

Authors:  R T Wertz; M J Collins; D Weiss; J F Kurtzke; T Friden; R H Brookshire; J Pierce; P Holtzapple; D J Hubbard; B E Porch; J A West; L Davis; V Matovitch; G K Morley; E Resurreccion
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1981-12

5.  Gesture and naming therapy for people with severe aphasia: a group study.

Authors:  Jane Marshall; Wendy Best; Naomi Cocks; Madeline Cruice; Tim Pring; Gemma Bulcock; Gemma Creek; Nancy Eales; Alice Lockhart Mummery; Niina Matthews; Anna Caute
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 6.  Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.

Authors:  Marian C Brady; Helen Kelly; Jon Godwin; Pam Enderby
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-05-16
  6 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  What is Functional Communication? A Theoretical Framework for Real-World Communication Applied to Aphasia Rehabilitation.

Authors:  W J Doedens; L Meteyard
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  Young Adults With Acquired Brain Injury Show Longitudinal Improvements in Cognition After Intensive Cognitive Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Natalie Gilmore; Daniel Mirman; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.674

Review 3.  Constraint-induced aphasia therapy in post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jiaqi Zhang; Jiadan Yu; Yong Bao; Qing Xie; Yang Xu; Junmei Zhang; Pu Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  ClearSpeechTogether: a Rater Blinded, Single, Controlled Feasibility Study of Speech Intervention for People with Progressive Ataxia.

Authors:  Anja Lowit; Jessica Cox; Melissa Loucas; Jennifer Grassly; Aisling Egan; Frits van Brenk; Marios Hadjivassiliou
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.648

Review 5.  The effects of COVID-19 on the rehabilitation of persons with aphasia: A scoping review.

Authors:  Khetsiwe P Masuku; Gift Khumalo; Nontokozo Shabangu
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2022-08-04

6.  The Utilization of Rehabilitation in Patients with Hemophilia A in Taiwan: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Chien-Min Chen; Yao-Hsu Yang; Chia-Hao Chang; Chih-Cheng Chen; Pau-Chung Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.