| Literature DB >> 27077842 |
Ya Nan Sun1, Joo Hwan No2, Ga Young Lee3, Wei Li4, Seo Young Yang5, Gyongseon Yang6, Thomas J Schmidt7, Jong Seong Kang8, Young Ho Kim9.
Abstract
Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) affect over one billion people all over the world. These diseases are classified as neglected because they impact populations in areas with poor financial conditions and hence do not attract sufficient research investment. Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT or sleeping sickness), caused by the parasite Trypanosoma brucei, is one of the NTDs. The current therapeutic interventions for T. brucei infections often have toxic side effects or require hospitalization so that they are not available in the rural environments where HAT occurs. Furthermore, parasite resistance is increasing, so that there is an urgent need to identify novel lead compounds against this infection. Recognizing the wide structural diversity of natural products, we desired to explore and identify novel antitrypanosomal chemotypes from a collection of natural products obtained from plants. In this study, 440 pure compounds from various medicinal plants were tested against T. brucei by in a screening using whole cell in vitro assays. As the result, twenty-two phenolic compounds exhibited potent activity against cultures of T. brucei. Among them, eight compounds-4, 7, 11, 14, 15, 18, 20, and 21-showed inhibitory activity against T. brucei, with IC50 values below 5 µM, ranging from 0.52 to 4.70 μM. Based on these results, we attempt to establish some general trends with respect to structure-activity relationships, which indicate that further investigation and optimization of these derivatives might enable the preparation of potentially useful compounds for treating HAT.Entities:
Keywords: QSAR; Trypanosoma brucei; medicinal plants; neglected tropical diseases; phenolic constituents
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27077842 PMCID: PMC6273235 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21040480
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Screening of plant-derived natural products for inhibition of T. brucei growth: Distribution plot of the 440 natural compounds (blue), negative controls 0.5% DMSO (red), and positive controls (pentamidine) at IC100 (black).
Figure 2Structures of the 22 phenolic hit compounds with determined IC50 values.
In vitro antiparasitic and cytotoxic activities of 22 phenolic compounds from medicinal plants.
| Compounds | Cytotoxicity a CC50 Values (µM) |
| Species | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEK239T | HepG2 | HEK239T | HepG2 | |||
|
| 9.84 ± 0.84 | >32.47 | >32.47 | >3.30 | >3.30 |
|
|
| 7.19 ± 1.02 | >21.35 | >29.55 | >2.97 | >4.11 |
|
|
| 9.12 ± 0.63 | >20.88 | >20.88 | >2.29 | >2.29 |
|
|
| 2.17 ± 0.50 | >28.81 | >29.19 | >13.28 | >13.54 |
|
|
| 10.37 ± 3.36 | >30.18 | >37.12 | >2.91 | >3.58 |
|
|
| 7.42 ± 1.12 | >25.45 | >25.45 | >3.43 | >3.43 | Angelica keiskei |
|
| 2.48 ± 0.02 | >32.36 | >32.36 | >13.05 | >13.05 |
|
|
| 16.42 ± 2.78 | >48.11 | >56.97 | >2.93 | >3.47 |
|
|
| 9.89 ± 0.51 | >33.82 | >33.82 | >3.42 | >3.42 |
|
|
| 8.76 ± 0.38 | >37.58 | >37.58 | >4.29 | >4.29 |
|
|
| 4.70 ± 1.53 | >23.22 | >29.99 | >4.94 | >6.38 |
|
|
| 5.61 ± 0.09 | >16.21 | >18.63 | >2.89 | >3.32 |
|
|
| 5.43 ± 0.26 | >11.84 | >13.68 | >2.18 | >2.52 |
|
|
| 3.54 ± 0.49 | >11.04 | >13.91 | >3.12 | >3.93 |
|
|
| 1.37 ± 0.01 | >23.76 | >23.76 | >17.34 | >17.34 |
|
|
| 10.96 ± 2.64 | >37.04 | >37.04 | >3.38 | >3.38 |
|
|
| 8.14 ± 1.37 | >29.14 | >29.14 | >3.58 | >3.58 |
|
|
| 3.40 ± 0.15 | >23.73 | >23.73 | >6.98 | >6.98 |
|
|
| 5.80 ± 0.07 | >35.03 | >35.03 | >6.04 | >6.04 |
|
|
| 0.52 ± 0.01 | >24.10 | >24.10 | >46.34 | >46.34 |
|
|
| 3.31 ± 0.75 | >23.13 | >23.13 | >6.99 | >6.99 |
|
|
| 6.50 ± 0.52 | >23.14 | >23.14 | >3.56 | >3.56 |
|
| Pentamidine c | 0.004 ± 0.003 | <0.40 | <0.40 | <26.7 | <26.7 | - |
| Chlorpromazine c | - | 19.89 | 16.50 | - | - | - |
a Selectivity relative to HEK293T and HepG2 cells for selected potent compounds; b s.i.: Selectivity index; c Positive control. All data represent the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments performed in triplicates (p < 0.01).
Figure 3(A) Scores plots of a principal component analysis (PCA) peformed with 193 descriptors of 2D molecule structures of the 440 natural products tested. Positions of the compounds in the property space defined by the first three principal components PCA1-3 are color-coded: GI < 50%: Blue; 50% < GI < 90%: Yellow; GI > 90%: red; (B) Scores plot showing only phenolic compounds. Positions of the 22 phenolic hits highlighted by larger symbols.
Figure 4Performance of the linear (A) and binary (B) QSAR models: Plots of experimental vs calculated activity data. (pIC50 = −log (IC50 [M]). Calibration data are shown in blue, those for leave-one-out cross validation in red.