Literature DB >> 27077792

Interactive social media interventions to promote health equity: an overview of reviews.

V Welch1, J Petkovic2, J Pardo Pardo2, T Rader3, P Tugwell1,3,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Social media use has been increasing in public health and health promotion because it can remove geographic and physical access barriers. However, these interventions also have the potential to increase health inequities for people who do not have access to or do not use social media. In this paper, we aim to assess the effects of interactive social media interventions on health outcomes, behaviour change and health equity.
METHODS: We conducted a rapid response overview of systematic reviews. We used a sensitive search strategy to identify systematic reviews and included those that focussed on interventions allowing two-way interaction such as discussion forums, social networks (e.g. Facebook and Twitter), blogging, applications linked to online communities and media sharing.
RESULTS: Eleven systematic reviews met our inclusion criteria. Most interventions addressed by the reviews included online discussion boards or similar strategies, either as stand-alone interventions or in combination with other interventions. Seven reviews reported mixed effects on health outcomes and healthy behaviours. We did not find disaggregated analyses across characteristics associated with disadvantage, such as lower socioeconomic status or age. However, some targeted studies reported that social media interventions were effective in specific populations in terms of age, socioeconomic status, ethnicities and place of residence. Four reviews reported qualitative benefits such as satisfaction, finding information and improved social support.
CONCLUSION: Social media interventions were effective in certain populations at risk for disadvantage (youth, older adults, low socioeconomic status, rural), which indicates that these interventions may be effective for promoting health equity. However, confirmation of effectiveness would require further study. Several reviews raised the issue of acceptability of social media interventions. Only four studies reported on the level of intervention use and all of these reported low use. More research on established social media platforms with existing social networks is needed, particularly in populations at risk for disadvantage, to assess effects on health outcomes and health equity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disadvantaged populations; health equity; health promotion; public health; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27077792      PMCID: PMC4964231          DOI: 10.24095/hpcdp.36.4.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can        ISSN: 2368-738X            Impact factor:   3.240


  27 in total

1.  Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey.

Authors:  Victor M Montori; Nancy L Wilczynski; Douglas Morgan; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-12-24

Review 2.  Health social networks as online life support groups for patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Edhelmira Lima Medina; Orlando Loques Filho; Cláudio Tinoco Mesquita
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 3.  Social networking sites and older users - a systematic review.

Authors:  Tobias Nef; Raluca L Ganea; René M Müri; Urs P Mosimann
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.878

4.  Internet-based innovations for the prevention of eating disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mandi S Newton; Donna Ciliska
Journal:  Eat Disord       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 5.  Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy.

Authors:  Thomas L Webb; Judith Joseph; Lucy Yardley; Susan Michie
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  Computer-based interventions for sexual health promotion: systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  J V Bailey; E Murray; G Rait; C H Mercer; R W Morris; R Peacock; J Cassell; I Nazareth
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.359

7.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

Review 8.  What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews.

Authors:  Theo Lorenc; Mark Petticrew; Vivian Welch; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Systematic reviews need to consider applicability to disadvantaged populations: inter-rater agreement for a health equity plausibility algorithm.

Authors:  Vivian Welch; Kevin Brand; Elizabeth Kristjansson; Janet Smylie; George Wells; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  Social media interventions for diet and exercise behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Gillian Williams; Michele P Hamm; Jocelyn Shulhan; Ben Vandermeer; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  55 in total

1.  Leveraging copresence to increase the effectiveness of gamified personalized normative feedback.

Authors:  Joseph W LaBrie; Jennifer L de Rutte; Sarah C Boyle; Cara N Tan; Andrew M Earle
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  A systematic approach to equity assessment for digital health interventions: case example of mobile personal health records.

Authors:  Martin C Were; Chaitali Sinha; Caricia Catalani
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Digital literacy linked to engagement and psychological benefits among breast cancer survivors in Internet-based peer support groups.

Authors:  Stephen J Lepore; Maria A Rincon; Joanne S Buzaglo; Mitch Golant; Morton A Lieberman; Sarah Bauerle Bass; Suzanne Chambers
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.520

4.  Health Policy Engagement Strategy for the Health Information Technology Policy Project of the Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center for Health Disparities Research.

Authors:  Tiffany Zellner Lawrence; Megan D Douglas; Latrice Rollins; Robina Josiah Willock; Dexter L Cooper; Richard A Gooden; Sherilyn Francis; Dominic H Mack
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 1.847

Review 5.  Neurology and the Internet: a review.

Authors:  Marcello Moccia; Francesco Brigo; Gioacchino Tedeschi; Simona Bonavita; Luigi Lavorgna
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Parental influences on marijuana use in emerging adulthood.

Authors:  Lucia E Cardenas; Maria L Schweer-Collins; Elizabeth A Stormshak
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2021-05-20

7.  Are Social Media Interventions for Health Behavior Change Efficacious among Populations with Health Disparities?: A Meta-Analytic Review.

Authors:  Rhyan N Vereen; Rachel Kurtzman; Seth M Noar
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2021-06-21

8.  Sensationalist social media usage by doctors and dentists during Covid-19.

Authors:  Richard Wm Law; Shalini Kanagasingam; Kartina A Choong
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2021-06-29

9.  Receptiveness and Responsiveness Toward Using Social Media for Safe Firearm Storage Outreach: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Esther Lam; Megan Moreno; Elizabeth Bennett; Ali Rowhani-Rahbar
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Use of Text Messaging and Facebook Groups to Support the Healthy Children, Strong Families 2 Healthy Lifestyle Intervention for American Indian Families.

Authors:  Emily J Tomayko; Eliza J Webber; Kate A Cronin; Ronald J Prince; Alexandra K Adams
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2021-05-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.