Literature DB >> 34148445

Are Social Media Interventions for Health Behavior Change Efficacious among Populations with Health Disparities?: A Meta-Analytic Review.

Rhyan N Vereen1, Rachel Kurtzman2,3, Seth M Noar1,3.   

Abstract

While prior reviews have identified positive effects of social media interventions for health behavior change generally, it is unclear whether these effects persist in traditionally underrepresented populations that are at disproportionate risk of disease. The current meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of social media interventions for health behavior change among populations with health disparities. We analyzed 17 studies with a cumulative N = 3,561. Social media interventions had a significant moderate-sized effect on behavior change among populations with health disparities (d = 0.303, 95% CI: 0.156, 0.460, p < .001), and there was significant heterogeneity across the studies (Q = 64.48, p < .001, I2 = 75.19). Exploratory moderator analyses revealed larger effects in studies with smaller sample size (p < .05) and those using additional intervention channels, including e-mail and telephone (p < .05). Findings suggest that social media interventions may be a promising intervention tool for stimulating behavior change among populations with health disparities, but several gaps remain in the literature. Public health professionals and other health communicators should further explore ways to increase both the reach and impact of social media interventions among populations with health disparities.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34148445      PMCID: PMC9238345          DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1937830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  34 in total

1.  Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Duval; R Tweedie
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Social networking technologies as an emerging tool for HIV prevention: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Sean D Young; William G Cumberland; Sung-Jae Lee; Devan Jaganath; Greg Szekeres; Thomas Coates
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Are Social Networking Sites Making Health Behavior Change Interventions More Effective? A Meta-Analytic Review.

Authors:  Qinghua Yang
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2017-02-16

4.  Telemedicine and Telehealth: The Potential to Improve Rural Access to Care.

Authors:  Roxanne Nelson
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.220

5.  The Put It Out Project (POP) Facebook Intervention for Young Sexual and Gender Minority Smokers: Outcomes of a Pilot, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Erin A Vogel; Danielle E Ramo; Meredith C Meacham; Judith J Prochaska; Kevin L Delucchi; Gary L Humfleet
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  A Randomized Trial of an Online Risk Reduction Intervention for Young Black MSM.

Authors:  Lisa B Hightow-Weidman; Sara LeGrand; Kathryn E Muessig; Ryan A Simmons; Karina Soni; Seul Ki Choi; Helene Kirschke-Schwartz; Joseph R Egger
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2019-05

Review 7.  Needed Interventions to Reduce Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health.

Authors:  David R Williams; Valerie Purdie-Vaughns
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.265

8.  Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of an online peer-to-peer social support ART adherence intervention.

Authors:  Keith J Horvath; J Michael Oakes; B R Simon Rosser; Gene Danilenko; Heather Vezina; K Rivet Amico; Mark L Williams; Jane Simoni
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2013-07

9.  Web-Based Interventions Alone or Supplemented with Peer-Led Support or Professional Email Counseling for Weight Loss and Weight Maintenance in Women from Rural Communities: Results of a Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Patricia A Hageman; Carol H Pullen; Melody Hertzog; Bunny Pozehl; Christine Eisenhauer; Linda S Boeckner
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2017-04-05

10.  The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases.

Authors:  Thomas Schäfer; Marcus A Schwarz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-04-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Social media interventions targeting exercise and diet behaviours in people with noncommunicable diseases (NCDs): A systematic review.

Authors:  Grace McKeon; Emelia Papadopoulos; Joseph Firth; Rohina Joshi; Scott Teasdale; Jill Newby; Simon Rosenbaum
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2022-01-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.