| Literature DB >> 27076990 |
Anna M Wise1, Johanna Nelson Weker1, Sam Kalirai2, Maryam Farmand3, David A Shapiro3, Florian Meirer2, Bert M Weckhuysen2.
Abstract
Understanding Fe deposition in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysis is critical for the mitigation of catalyst degradation. Here we employ soft X-ray ptychography to determine at the nanoscale the distribution and chemical state of Fe in an aged FCC catalyst particle. We show that both particle swelling due to colloidal Fe deposition and Fe penetration into the matrix as a result of precracking of large organic molecules occur. The application of ptychography allowed us to provide direct visual evidence for these two distinct Fe-based deactivation mechanisms, which have so far been proposed only on the basis of indirect evidence.Entities:
Keywords: catalyst deactivation; chemical imaging; fluid catalytic cracking; iron and soft X-ray ptychography
Year: 2016 PMID: 27076990 PMCID: PMC4822187 DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b00221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Catal Impact factor: 13.084
Figure 1Scanning transmission X-ray microscopy image of individual ECAT FCC particle cross sections (A,B), recorded at 700 eV, showing the region of interest selected for ptychography. Ptychography data were collected over the region shown in (C) for elemental mapping of Fe and La. The ROI was reduced to the region shown in (D) for NEXAFS analysis, recording a series of images across the Fe L3 X-ray absorption edge. All data were collected using a beam footprint of 100 nm on the sample.
Figure 2(A) Distribution of La (red) and Fe (green) within the ECAT FCC particle derived from ptychography data collected at the Fe L3 and La M5 absorption edges. Circles highlight particulate Fe visible at the surface of the particle. (B–D) Enlarged view on the corresponding encircled areas.
Figure 3Particle size distribution of the La-containing zeolite domains. Discrete particles are indicated by different colors (inset) for the La particles seen in red in Figure .
Figure 4La (red) and Fe (green) distribution map (A) and cluster map (B) generated from principal component analysis and clustering of the per pixel NEXAFS data. In (C), the average NEXAFS of each generated cluster are reported showing clear differences in Fe phase. The arrow in (B) highlights the crack visible in the surface layer.
Figure 5Intensity maps of Fe3+ (A) and Fe2+ (B) determined by LCF of the per-pixel NEXAFS data. Intensity maps were rescaled and combined to map the relative distributions of Fe3+ (green) and Fe2+ (blue) (C). NEXAFS spectra and a map of R2 values are shown in the Supporting Information (Figures S9 and S10).