Literature DB >> 27076599

Analysis of Workflow and Time to Treatment on Thrombectomy Outcome in the Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Proximal Occlusion Ischemic Stroke (ESCAPE) Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Bijoy K Menon1, Tolulope T Sajobi1, Yukun Zhang1, Jeremy L Rempel1, Ashfaq Shuaib1, John Thornton1, David Williams1, Daniel Roy1, Alexandre Y Poppe1, Tudor G Jovin1, Biggya Sapkota1, Blaise W Baxter1, Timo Krings1, Frank L Silver1, Donald F Frei1, Christopher Fanale1, Donatella Tampieri1, Jeanne Teitelbaum1, Cheemun Lum1, Dar Dowlatshahi1, Muneer Eesa1, Mark W Lowerison1, Noreen R Kamal1, Andrew M Demchuk1, Michael D Hill1, Mayank Goyal2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Proximal Occlusion Ischemic Stroke (ESCAPE) trial used innovative imaging and aggressive target time metrics to demonstrate the benefit of endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke. We analyze the impact of time on clinical outcome and the effect of patient, hospital, and health system characteristics on workflow within the trial. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Relationship between outcome (modified Rankin Scale) and interval times was modeled by using logistic regression. Association between time intervals (stroke onset to arrival in endovascular-capable hospital, to qualifying computed tomography, to groin puncture, and to reperfusion) and patient, hospital, and health system characteristics were modeled by using negative binomial regression. Every 30-minute increase in computed tomography-to-reperfusion time reduced the probability of achieving a functionally independent outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale 0-2) by 8.3% (P=0.006). Symptom onset-to-imaging time was not associated with outcome (P>0.05). Onset-to-endovascular hospital arrival time was 42% (34 minutes) longer among patients receiving intravenous alteplase at the referring hospital (drip and ship) versus direct transfer (mothership). Computed tomography-to-groin puncture time was 15% (8 minutes) shorter among patients presenting during work hours versus off hours, 41% (24 minutes) shorter in drip-ship patients versus mothership, and 43% (22 minutes) longer when general anesthesia was administered. The use of a balloon guide catheter during endovascular procedures shortened puncture-to-reperfusion time by 21% (8 minutes).
CONCLUSIONS: Imaging-to-reperfusion time is a significant predictor of outcome in the ESCAPE trial. Inefficiencies in triaging, off-hour presentation, intravenous alteplase administration, use of general anesthesia, and endovascular techniques offer major opportunities for improvement in workflow. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01778335.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebrovascular disorders; emergency treatment; endovascular procedures; stroke; thrombolytic therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27076599     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  58 in total

1.  Influence of a combined CT/C-arm system on periprocedural workflow and procedure times in mechanical thrombectomy.

Authors:  Johannes Pfaff; Silvia Schönenberger; Christian Herweh; Mirko Pham; Simon Nagel; Peter Arthur Ringleb; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Markus Alfred Möhlenbruch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Time is brain : Time management in acute stroke treatment].

Authors:  S Behnke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  The Need for Better Data on Patients with Acute Stroke Who Are Not Treated Because of Unfavorable Imaging.

Authors:  M Goyal; B K Menon; M A Almekhlafi; A Demchuk; M D Hill
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Multisociety Consensus Quality Improvement Revised Consensus Statement for Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  D Sacks; B Baxter; B C V Campbell; J S Carpenter; C Cognard; D Dippel; M Eesa; U Fischer; K Hausegger; J A Hirsch; M S Hussain; O Jansen; M V Jayaraman; A A Khalessi; B W Kluck; S Lavine; P M Meyers; S Ramee; D A Rüfenacht; C M Schirmer; D Vorwerk
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Which patients with acute stroke due to proximal occlusion should not be treated with endovascular thrombectomy?

Authors:  Mayank Goyal; Mohammed A Almekhlafi; Christoph Cognard; Ryan McTaggart; Kristine Blackham; Alessandra Biondi; Aad van der Lugt; Charles B L M Majoie; Wim H van Zwam; H Bart van der Worp; Michael D Hill
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Two Paradigms for Endovascular Thrombectomy After Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Gaspard Gerschenfeld; Ioan-Paul Muresan; Raphael Blanc; Michael Obadia; Marie Abrivard; Michel Piotin; Sonia Alamowitch
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 18.302

7.  Modeling Stroke Patient Transport for All Patients With Suspected Large-Vessel Occlusion.

Authors:  Jessalyn K Holodinsky; Tyler S Williamson; Andrew M Demchuk; Henry Zhao; Luke Zhu; Michael J Francis; Mayank Goyal; Michael D Hill; Noreen Kamal
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 8.  Stroke Transfer and its Organizational Paradigm : Review of Organizational Paradigms and the Impact on Outcome.

Authors:  Lili Détraz; Marielle Ernst; Romain Bourcier
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 9.  Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Recent Insights and Future Directions.

Authors:  Aravind Ganesh; Mayank Goyal
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.081

10.  Simple aspiration with balloon catheter technique (simple ABC technique) against proximal internal carotid artery occlusion in cases of cardiogenic cerebral embolism.

Authors:  Akitake Okamura; Kazuhiko Kuroki; Katsuhiro Shinagawa; Naoto Yamada
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 1.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.