Corey T Beals1,2, Robert A Magnussen1,2, William C Graham3, David C Flanigan4,5. 1. The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, Sports Health and Performance Institute, The Ohio State University Sports Medicine Center and Cartilage Restoration Program, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 2050 Kenny Road, Suite 3100, Columbus, OH, 43221, USA. 3. OrthoCarolina, 10650 Park Rd, Suite 120, Charlotte, NC, 28210, USA. 4. The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA. david.flanigan@osumc.edu. 5. Department of Orthopaedics, Sports Health and Performance Institute, The Ohio State University Sports Medicine Center and Cartilage Restoration Program, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 2050 Kenny Road, Suite 3100, Columbus, OH, 43221, USA. david.flanigan@osumc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Meniscal pathology is a commonly seen orthopedic condition that can affect a wide age range of patients. Athletes subject their menisci to an increased amount of stress during their careers and may increase their risk of meniscal pathology. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the prevalence of isolated meniscal pathology in asymptomatic athletes. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken to determine the prevalence of meniscal pathology in asymptomatic athletes. A search of multiple databases was conducted. Recreational and higher-level athletes were included. Fourteen articles including 295 athletes (208 male, 87 female) were identified for inclusion (age range 14-66 years, mean 31.2 years). Meniscal pathology was visualized with magnetic resonance imaging and graded on a 1-4 scale (grades 1 and 2 indicating intrasubstance damage, grades 3 and 4 indicating a tear). RESULTS: There was an overall prevalence of 27.2 % (105/386) of knees with intrasubstance meniscal damage (grades 1 and 2), and 3.9 % (15/386) of knees with a tear (grades 3 and 4). When athletes were split into those who participate in pivoting sports versus non-pivoting sports, pivoting athletes showed an overall prevalence of 15.3 % (31/202) of knees with intrasubstance meniscal pathology and 2.5 % (5/202) of knees with a tear. Non-pivoting athletes showed a prevalence of 54.5 % (61/112) of knees with intrasubstance meniscal pathology and 5.4 % (6/112) of knees with a tear. CONCLUSION: The overall prevalence of isolated meniscal pathology in asymptomatic athletes was 31.1 % (27.2 % with intrasubstance meniscal damage and 3.9 % with a meniscal tear). More studies of age-comparable, non-athletic populations are necessary for direct comparison with these groups.
BACKGROUND: Meniscal pathology is a commonly seen orthopedic condition that can affect a wide age range of patients. Athletes subject their menisci to an increased amount of stress during their careers and may increase their risk of meniscal pathology. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the prevalence of isolated meniscal pathology in asymptomatic athletes. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken to determine the prevalence of meniscal pathology in asymptomatic athletes. A search of multiple databases was conducted. Recreational and higher-level athletes were included. Fourteen articles including 295 athletes (208 male, 87 female) were identified for inclusion (age range 14-66 years, mean 31.2 years). Meniscal pathology was visualized with magnetic resonance imaging and graded on a 1-4 scale (grades 1 and 2 indicating intrasubstance damage, grades 3 and 4 indicating a tear). RESULTS: There was an overall prevalence of 27.2 % (105/386) of knees with intrasubstance meniscal damage (grades 1 and 2), and 3.9 % (15/386) of knees with a tear (grades 3 and 4). When athletes were split into those who participate in pivoting sports versus non-pivoting sports, pivoting athletes showed an overall prevalence of 15.3 % (31/202) of knees with intrasubstance meniscal pathology and 2.5 % (5/202) of knees with a tear. Non-pivoting athletes showed a prevalence of 54.5 % (61/112) of knees with intrasubstance meniscal pathology and 5.4 % (6/112) of knees with a tear. CONCLUSION: The overall prevalence of isolated meniscal pathology in asymptomatic athletes was 31.1 % (27.2 % with intrasubstance meniscal damage and 3.9 % with a meniscal tear). More studies of age-comparable, non-athletic populations are necessary for direct comparison with these groups.
Authors: M W Creaby; Y Wang; K L Bennell; R S Hinman; B R Metcalf; K-A Bowles; F M Cicuttini Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Peter R Kornaat; Johan L Bloem; Ruth Y T Ceulemans; Naghmeh Riyazi; Frits R Rosendaal; Rob G Nelissen; Wayne O Carter; Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand; Margreet Kloppenburg Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Robert Stahl; Anthony Luke; C Benjamin Ma; Roland Krug; Lynne Steinbach; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2008-05-08 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Theresa Diermeier; Knut Beitzel; Laura Bachmann; Wolf Petersen; Katrin Esefeld; Klaus Wörtler; Andreas B Imhoff; Andrea Achtnich Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Joshua J Heerey; Joanne L Kemp; Andrea B Mosler; Denise M Jones; Tania Pizzari; Mark J Scholes; Rintje Agricola; Kay M Crossley Journal: Sports Med Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Adam G Culvenor; Britt Elin Øiestad; Harvi F Hart; Joshua J Stefanik; Ali Guermazi; Kay M Crossley Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2018-06-09 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Chae Young Hong; Chul Gab Lee; Dong Hwi Kim; Yong Soo Cho; Kweon Young Kim; So Yeon Ryu; Han Soo Song Journal: Saf Health Work Date: 2020-06-08