OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between dynamic mechanical loading, as indicated by external knee adduction moment (KAM) measures during walking, and measures of articular cartilage morphology and subchondral bone size in people with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: 180 individuals with radiographic medial tibiofemoral OA participated. Peak KAM and KAM angular impulse were measured by walking gait analysis. Tibial cartilage volume and plateau bone area, and tibiofemoral cartilage defects were determined from magnetic resonance imaging using validated methods. RESULTS: Both peak KAM (coefficient=0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.79, P=0.03) and KAM impulse (coefficient=1.79, 95% CI 0.80-2.78, P<0.001) were positively associated with the severity of medial tibiofemoral cartilage defects. KAM impulse was also associated with the prevalence of medial tibiofemoral cartilage defects (odds ratio 4.78, 95% CI 1.10-20.76, P=0.04). Peak KAM (B=0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.09, P=0.02) and KAM impulse (B=0.16, 95% CI 0.06-0.25, P=0.002) were positively associated with medial:lateral tibial plateau bone area, and KAM impulse was also associated with medial tibial plateau bone area (B=133.7, 95% CI 4.0-263.3, P=0.04). There was no significant association between KAM measures and tibial cartilage volume. CONCLUSION: Peak KAM and KAM impulse are associated with cartilage defects and subchondral bone area in patients with medial knee OA, suggesting that increased mechanical loading may play a role in the pathological changes in articular cartilage and subchondral bone that occur with medial knee OA.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between dynamic mechanical loading, as indicated by external knee adduction moment (KAM) measures during walking, and measures of articular cartilage morphology and subchondral bone size in people with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: 180 individuals with radiographic medial tibiofemoral OA participated. Peak KAM and KAM angular impulse were measured by walking gait analysis. Tibial cartilage volume and plateau bone area, and tibiofemoral cartilage defects were determined from magnetic resonance imaging using validated methods. RESULTS: Both peak KAM (coefficient=0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.79, P=0.03) and KAM impulse (coefficient=1.79, 95% CI 0.80-2.78, P<0.001) were positively associated with the severity of medial tibiofemoral cartilage defects. KAM impulse was also associated with the prevalence of medial tibiofemoral cartilage defects (odds ratio 4.78, 95% CI 1.10-20.76, P=0.04). Peak KAM (B=0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.09, P=0.02) and KAM impulse (B=0.16, 95% CI 0.06-0.25, P=0.002) were positively associated with medial:lateral tibial plateau bone area, and KAM impulse was also associated with medial tibial plateau bone area (B=133.7, 95% CI 4.0-263.3, P=0.04). There was no significant association between KAM measures and tibial cartilage volume. CONCLUSION: Peak KAM and KAM impulse are associated with cartilage defects and subchondral bone area in patients with medial knee OA, suggesting that increased mechanical loading may play a role in the pathological changes in articular cartilage and subchondral bone that occur with medial knee OA.
Authors: David John Saxby; Adam L Bryant; Ans Van Ginckel; Yuanyuan Wang; Xinyang Wang; Luca Modenese; Pauline Gerus; Jason M Konrath; Karine Fortin; Tim V Wrigley; Kim L Bennell; Flavia M Cicuttini; Christopher Vertullo; Julian A Feller; Tim Whitehead; Price Gallie; David G Lloyd Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: M D Bucknor; L Nardo; G B Joseph; H Alizai; W Srikhum; M C Nevitt; J A Lynch; C E McCulloch; T M Link Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Richard B Souza; Charles Fang; Anthony Luke; Samuel Wu; Xiaojuan Li; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2011-11-25 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: H-L Teng; N E Calixto; T D MacLeod; L Nardo; T M Link; S Majumdar; R B Souza Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: A E Wink; K D Gross; C A Brown; A Guermazi; F Roemer; J Niu; J Torner; C E Lewis; M C Nevitt; I Tolstykh; L Sharma; D T Felson Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2017-01-16 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: D Kumar; J Schooler; J Zuo; C E McCulloch; L Nardo; T M Link; X Li; S Majumdar Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2012-10-06 Impact factor: 6.576