Canine transmissible venereal tumor (CTVT) is the only naturally contagious tumor that is transmitted during coitus or social behaviors. Based on the tumor's location, the diagnosis of genital TVT (GTVT) is comparably easier than those in the extragenital area (ETVT) that are more easily incorrectly diagnosed. Fortunately, CTVT cells contain a specific long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE), inserted upstream of the myc gene, allowing a diagnostic polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based detection assay. The objectives of this study were aimed to improve the diagnostic accuracy by applying the diagnostic LINE1-c-myc PCR assay and fine needle aspiration (FNA) collection in direct comparison with standard cytological and histopathological analyses. Seventy-four dogs, comprised of 41 and 31 dogs with tumor masses at their external genitalia and extragenital areas (e.g. skin and nasal cavity), respectively, were included in this study. The signalment of these 65 dogs and clinical history of 20 client-owned dogs were collected. Samples were taken by biopsy for both histopathological examination and FNA for cytological examination and diagnostic PCR. The PCR products from 10 apparently CTVT samples were purified and sequenced. Sixty-one CTVT cases were diagnosed by cytological and histological analyses, but 65 were positive by the PCR assay. Overall, the PCR assay improved the accuracy of diagnostic CTVT results, especially for the more difficult ETVT tumors. Moreover, this PCR-based approach can facilitate the decision as to discontinue chemotherapy by discrimination between residual tumor cell masses and fibrotic tissue.
Canine transmissible venereal tumor (CTVT) is the only naturally contagious tumor that is transmitted during coitus or social behaviors. Based on the tumor's location, the diagnosis of genital TVT (GTVT) is comparably easier than those in the extragenital area (ETVT) that are more easily incorrectly diagnosed. Fortunately, CTVT cells contain a specific long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE), inserted upstream of the myc gene, allowing a diagnostic polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based detection assay. The objectives of this study were aimed to improve the diagnostic accuracy by applying the diagnostic LINE1-c-myc PCR assay and fine needle aspiration (FNA) collection in direct comparison with standard cytological and histopathological analyses. Seventy-four dogs, comprised of 41 and 31 dogs with tumor masses at their external genitalia and extragenital areas (e.g. skin and nasal cavity), respectively, were included in this study. The signalment of these 65 dogs and clinical history of 20 client-owned dogs were collected. Samples were taken by biopsy for both histopathological examination and FNA for cytological examination and diagnostic PCR. The PCR products from 10 apparently CTVT samples were purified and sequenced. Sixty-one CTVT cases were diagnosed by cytological and histological analyses, but 65 were positive by the PCR assay. Overall, the PCR assay improved the accuracy of diagnostic CTVT results, especially for the more difficult ETVT tumors. Moreover, this PCR-based approach can facilitate the decision as to discontinue chemotherapy by discrimination between residual tumor cell masses and fibrotic tissue.
Canine transmissible venereal tumor (CTVT) is an important contagious tumor in tropical and
subtropical countries. It is usually transmitted by viable cancer cells from CTVT dogs to
susceptible hosts during coitus or other social behaviors [5]. The tumors are mostly located in the external genital area; of the vulva and
penis, but they are also found in other parts of the body, such as skin, eyes, nasal cavity
and oral mucosa [10, 12, 15, 17]. The metastasis potential is quite rare, but can occur in immunosuppressed dogs
[5, 9].CanineTVT is classified into two types according to its anatomical location, namely; genital
TVT (GTVT) and extragenital TVT (ETVT). For GTVT, it is easy to diagnose from its location and
cauliflower-like mass feature, but diagnosis of ETVT is more ambiguous due to the button-like
mass in skin form or the appearance of the nasal and oral masses. Since CTVT is a round cell
tumor, it needs differential diagnosis from other round cell tumors, such as mast cell tumor,
histiocytic tumor, lymphoma, etc., amelanotic melanoma and other poorly differentiated
carcinomas [16]. The use of conventional, cytological
and histopathological analyses, only cannot confirm a CTVT diagnosis, if their feature is
different from their normal appearance. In addition, CTVTs also share the same origin as
histiocytic tumors, so immunohistochemistry (IHC) cannot make a definitive diagnosis [5, 11]. Fortunately,
CTVT has a unique molecular characteristic based around a c-myc gene
re-arrangement that is absent in normal somatic cells and gametes, and other tumor cells
[7]. This rearrangement is derived from the insertion
of a long interspersed nuclear element (LINE) or long interspersed repeated DNA element,
retroposon element [1] that shows a 98% homology to the
canine LINE-1 [3, 4]. Thus, the presence of this LINE element near c-myc
(LINE-c-myc) has been used as a diagnostic tool to make a definitive
diagnosis of CTVT cases using in situ polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and
conventional PCR in controversial cases [8, 16].Within Bangkok (Capital city of Thailand), CTVT is the most common reproductive tumor of
dogs, regardless of their sex and age [19]. The
specific climate and poor policy of controlling stray dogs in Thailand tend to increase the
number of CTVT-bearing dogs, not only for GTVT but also for ETVT. Therefore, an accurate,
rapid and reliable diagnostic tool is needed for therapeutic planning. This study aimed to
improve the diagnostic accuracy of CTVT by applying the LINE-c-myc PCR assay
on cell-based samples and to also provide an optimal sample collection for PCR using fine
needle aspiration (FNA) to derive cell samples for additional cytological and
histopathological analyses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals: Seventy-four tumor-bearing dogs (cases 1 to 74), regardless of
their sex, breeds or age, were included in this prospective study, according to only the
inclusion criteria that the tumors were located in the i.) external genital area (vulva,
vagina or perineum in females and penis, prepuce or scrotum in males) or ii.) extra-genital
areas, such as the skin, nasal or oral cavity. Signalments (sex, age and breed), anatomical
site of the lesion mass and the owner status were recorded along with, for those dogs with
an owner, the clinical history of any previous chemotherapy. All dogs were subjected to a
complete physical examination at the Oncology Unit, Small Animal Teaching Hospital, Faculty
of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.Sample collections: All dogs were intramuscularly injected with
tiletamine-zolazepam (Zoletil®, Virbac, Carros, France, at a dosage of 3–7 mg/kg)
and locally anesthetized with 1% lidocaine HCl (Locana, L.B.S. laboratory Ltd., Bangkok,
Thailand, at a dosage of 0.5–1 ml/site) in the tissue sampling region.
After biopsy, the tissue was impressed on glass slides for cytological examination. Each
tissue sample was halved, with one piece being preserved in 10% (w/v) neutral buffered
formalin for routine histopathological diagnosis and the another piece being kept in a
sterile eppendorf at −80°C for the LINE1-c-myc PCR-based detection of CTVT.
In addition, FNA-cells were also collected and kept in sterile PBS at −80°C until used for
the molecular and histological diagnoses of CTVT. All sampling procedures were approved by
the Chulalongkorn University Animal Care and Use Committee (No. 133100077), and the dog’s
owners agreed to sign the consent form.Cytology and histopathology examinations: Impression slides were left to
dry in the open air, fixed with methanol and stained with Giemsa (Merck, Darmstadt, German)
or Dip quick® (Clinag Co., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand) staining protocol. For
formalin fixed tissues, they were subjected to routinely histological process and stained
with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). All specimens were examined under light microscopy by
pathologists. Each sample was examined independently by three pathologists to make a
descriptive analysis. Cases of CTVT cases were diagnosed based on cell morphology following
cytological and histopathological analyses. In addition, IHC was performed using cytokeratin
(CK; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for confirmation of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal
cell tumor, vimentin (Dako) and lysozyme (Dako) to confirm histiocytic tumor, Melan-A (Dako)
to confirm malignant melanoma, CD3 (Leica, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.) and PAX-5 (Leica) to
confirm lymphoma (LSA) and by toluidine blue staining to confirm mast cell tumor.The LINE1-c-myc PCR assay: Total genomic DNA was
extracted from FNA-derived cells and fresh tissue using Mammalian genomic DNA miniprep kit
(Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.) following the manufacturer’s instruction. The DNA
quantity and quality were measured using a NanoDrop Lite spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher
Scientific Inc., Wilmington, DE, U.S.A.). The primer pair specific to the region of the
LINE-c-myc gene re-arrangement MycS-2 (5′-ATTCCTACGAATGAATGATTGGCCAGA-3′)
and LINE AS-1 (5′-CAGACACATAGATCAGTGGAACAGAAT-3′) were used as previously described [8].The PCR reaction contained 100–200 ng DNA, 10 µM of each
primer and GoTaq® Green Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, U.S.A.). The PCR
thermal cycling consisted of 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min (denaturation), 64°C for 50 sec
(annealing) and 72°C for 1 min (extension). The PCR products (desired amplicon was 550 bp)
were then resolved using 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by
UV-transillumination after staining with 10% (w/v) ethidium bromide. Negative and positive
controls, respectively, were sterile water in place of the sample DNA extract and a GTVT
sample previously diagnosed by both histopathology and PCR. The specificity of the
LINE1-c-myc PCR assay for CTVT detection was determined by incorporation
of other tumors, such as amelanotic melanoma, histiocytoma, basal cell tumor, lymphoma, mast
cell tumor, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and chronic inflammatory tissue, in the screening
process. The dynamic range of detectable DNA was ascertained by performing ten-fold dilution
of positive control sample.Phylogenetic analysis: Ten positive PCR products, from five FNA-derived
samples, case 1 (CTVT-THC3), case 2 (CTVT-THC4), case 7 (CTVT-THC10), case 8 (CTVT-TH-C14)
and case 11 (sample from Dog No 1 in Table
2, CTVT-THC13) and five fresh tissue samples, case 4 (CTVT-THF1), case 5 from
skin mass (CTVT-THF3), case 5 from penile mass (CTVT-THF4), case 6 (CTVT-THF5) and case 10
(CTVT-THF6), from different sites of anatomical lesion (ETVT or GTVT), were purified using
NucleoSpin Extract II (Machinery-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and submitted for commercial
sequencing (Solgent, Daejeon, Korea). Thereafter, sequences were analyzed, aligned and
compared with the deposited sequences in the GenBank database using the BLASTn search
algorithm. A phylogenetic tree was constructed from the aligned sequences using the MEGA 5
software package by means of the Maximum Likelihood (ML) algorithm. Standard error was
calculated by the bootstrap method using 1,000 replicates. All sequences were submitted to
GenBank, with their respective accession codes given in Fig.4.
Table 2.
Controversial results from the different CTVT diagnostic methods
Case
Sexa)
Age (year)
Area
Cytology
Histopathology
IHC
PCR
Final
Fresh tissue
Cell derived FNA
Diagnosis
11
M
4
Nasal cavity
Chronic inflammation
N/Ab)
N/Ab)
(+)
ETVT
12
F
12
Rectum
SCC
ETVT
Vimentin (+)
(+)
(+)
ETVT
CK (−)
16
M
3
Skin
Histiocytoma
Histiocytoma
Vimentin (+)
(+)
(+)
ETVT
CK (−)
Lysozyme (−)
24
M
5
Skin
Histiocytic
Histiocytic
Vimentin (+)
N/Ab)
(+)
ETVT
sarcoma
sarcoma
CK (−)
Lysozyme (−)
a) F; female, M; male. b) N/A; tissue for histopathology was not available.
Fig. 4.
Phylogenetic tree of the LINE-c-myc CTVT sequence of this study and
the related sequences from the Genbank database. CTVT from Thailand sequences: FNA
sample (triangle) sequences of KU680469 (case 1), KU680470 (case 2), KU680471 (case
7), KU680472 (case 11 in Table 2) and
KU680473 (case 8); and fresh tissue samples (circle) from KU680474 (case 4), KU680475
(case 5, skin mass), KU680476 (case 5, penile mass), KU680477 (case 6) and KU680478
(case 10). CTVT samples in Genbank: Canis lupus familiaris LINE-1
elememt DNA partial sequence (AB012217), LINE/c-myc junction sequence
(S55298), Canis familiaris c-myc gene partial
sequence (AY032723), Dog c-myc oncogene DNA with a retroposon
insertion target sequence (M37386) and Dog c-myc oncogene with an
inserted retroposon (M37385).
a) F; female, M; male. b) N/A; tissue for histopathology was not available.Data analysis: Descriptive analysis was performed for the signalments data
(sex, age and breed), clinical information (anatomical site of the lesion mass, owner status
and clinical history of previous chemotherapy) and the results from the cytological,
histological and phylogenetic analyses. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive
value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated and comparatively evaluated
among each method.
RESULTS
Detection of CTVT by the LINE1-c-myc PCR assay: To confirm the presence of
CTVT, genomic DNA from fresh tissue and/ or cell-derived FNA samples (n=74) was evaluated by
the LINE1-c-myc PCR assay. Only TVT cases were successfully amplified with
these specific primer, yielding the expected 550-bp amplicons (Fig. 1), while the other tested tumor types of histiocytic sarcoma,
histiocytoma, SCC, basal cell carcinoma, lymphoma, mast cell tumor, amelanotic melanoma and
chronic inflammation of skin, were all negative. The minimum detectable DNA level was 10
ng, as determined by performing ten-fold dilutions of the positive
control sample (data not shown).
Fig. 1.
PCR detection of the LINE1-c-myc gene rearrangement of CTVT origin
from cell-derived FNA samples. PCR products (550 bp) were resolved on a 1.5% (w/v)
agarose gel. (Lane 1=100 bp DNA marker, Lane 2=positive control, Lane 3=negative
control, Lanes 4–9 are samples from the vaginal mass (case 1), skin mass (case 2),
nasal mass (case 7), nasal mass (case 8), nasal mass (case 11 in Table 2) and chronic inflammation tissue (case 9),
respectively.)
PCR detection of the LINE1-c-myc gene rearrangement of CTVT origin
from cell-derived FNA samples. PCR products (550 bp) were resolved on a 1.5% (w/v)
agarose gel. (Lane 1=100 bp DNA marker, Lane 2=positive control, Lane 3=negative
control, Lanes 4–9 are samples from the vaginal mass (case 1), skin mass (case 2),
nasal mass (case 7), nasal mass (case 8), nasal mass (case 11 in Table 2) and chronic inflammation tissue (case 9),
respectively.)Cytology, histopathology, IHC and LINE1-c-myc PCR: Out of the 74 cases
examined, 61 were diagnosed as CTVT positive by cytological examination (Table 1). However, controversial results were noted in case 12
which was diagnosed as SCC by cytology (Fig. 2) as
the tumor cells were pleomorphic with large sized cells resembled epithelial cells.
Conversely, after performing histopathological and IHC analyses, the final diagnosis was
changed to ETVT because the tumor cells were arranged in a sheath pattern as a round cell
tumor, while IHC showed that the tumor cells were positive for vimentin and negative for
cytokeratin (CK). The cases initially diagnosed as CTVT by the cytological and
histopathological analyses were found to be positive by the PCR analysis, in terms of the
presence of the expected 550 bp amplicon (Fig. 1).
Interestingly, case 16 and case 24 (Table
2), which were diagnosed as histiocytic derived cancers by the
histopathological analysis and were positive for vimentin and negative for CK by IHC
analysis, were also found to be CTVT by the LINE1-c-myc PCR analysis of
their FNA derived cell samples. These two cases were finally diagnosed as ETVT (Fig. 3). The cytology and histopathology of case 16
are shown in Fig. 2B and 2D, respectively.
Table 1.
Diagnostic result of CTVT status derived from the cytology, histopathology, IHC
and LINE-c-myc PCR assay
Type of tumor
Cytology (n=74)
Histopathology (n=72a))
IHC/Special stain
PCR
Definitive diagnosis (n=74)
CTVT
61
61
62 PCR (+)
CTVT 62 cases
Histiocytic sarcoma (HS)
4
4
4 Vimentin (+)
1 PCR (+)
CTVT 1 case
3 Lysozyme (+)
3 PCR (−)
HS 3 cases
4 CK (−)
Histiocytoma
1
1
1 Vimentin (+)
1 PCR (+)
CTVT 1 case
1 Lysozyme (+)
1 CK (−)
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)
2
1
1 Vimentin (+)
1 PCR (+)
CTVT 1 case
1 CK (−)
1 PCR (−)
SCC 1 case
Basal cell tumor
1
1
1 CK (+)
1 PCR (−)
Basal cell tumor 1 case
Lymphoma (LSA)
1
1
CD3 (+)
1 PCR (−)
LSA 1 case
PAX-5 (−)
Chronic inflammation of skin
2
1
1 PCR (−)
chronic inflammation 1 case
Mast cell tumor (MCT)
1
1
Toluidine blue (+)
1 PCR (−)
MCT 1 case
Melanoma
1
1
Melan-A (+)
1 PCR (−)
Melanoma 1 case
a) Tissues from 2 cases were unavailable for histopathological examination.
Fig. 2.
Cytology (40×) and histopathology (40×) of the tumor mass stained with Giemsa stain
and H&E stain, respectively. Tumor cells from (A) case 12 in Table 2 with pleomorphic round to ovoid cells, moderate to
large ovoid amphophilic nuclei, abundant pale basophilic cytoplasm and vacuolated, (B)
case 16 in Table 2 with pleomorphic round
to ovoid cells, round to ovoid eccentrically and centrically amphophilic nuclei and
some cells with vacuoles in the cytoplasm, (C) case 12 with pleomorphic round to ovoid
shaped cells arranged in a solid sheath pattern, amphophilic nucleoli and a clear pale
cytoplasm, and (D) case 16 with a moderate pale cytoplasm and round to ovoid
amphophilic nuclei. Mitotic figures were seen. Bar=25 µm.
Fig. 3.
PCR detection of the LINE1-c-myc gene from cell-derived FNA samples
(cases 12 and 24, Table 2). PCR products
(550 bp) were resolved on a 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel. (Lane1=100-bp DNA marker, Lane 2
=positive control, Lane 3 =case 12, Lane 4 =case 24 and Lane 5 =negative control)
a) Tissues from 2 cases were unavailable for histopathological examination.Cytology (40×) and histopathology (40×) of the tumor mass stained with Giemsa stain
and H&E stain, respectively. Tumor cells from (A) case 12 in Table 2 with pleomorphic round to ovoid cells, moderate to
large ovoid amphophilic nuclei, abundant pale basophilic cytoplasm and vacuolated, (B)
case 16 in Table 2 with pleomorphic round
to ovoid cells, round to ovoid eccentrically and centrically amphophilic nuclei and
some cells with vacuoles in the cytoplasm, (C) case 12 with pleomorphic round to ovoid
shaped cells arranged in a solid sheath pattern, amphophilic nucleoli and a clear pale
cytoplasm, and (D) case 16 with a moderate pale cytoplasm and round to ovoid
amphophilic nuclei. Mitotic figures were seen. Bar=25 µm.PCR detection of the LINE1-c-myc gene from cell-derived FNA samples
(cases 12 and 24, Table 2). PCR products
(550 bp) were resolved on a 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel. (Lane1=100-bp DNA marker, Lane 2
=positive control, Lane 3 =case 12, Lane 4 =case 24 and Lane 5 =negative control)The DNA sequences of the respective amplicons from fresh tissues and cell-derived FNA
samples revealed 80–98% and 96–100% homology to previous sequences, respectively. The ML
phylogenetic analysis revealed a high similarity between the samples in this study and those
from previous studies available in the Genbank database (Fig. 4). The samples (Genbank accession numbers in parenthesis), case 1
(KU680469), case 2 (KU680470), case 7 (KU680471), case11 (KU680472) and case 8 (KU680473),
were cell-derived FNA samples. In addition, case 4 (KU680474) and case 5 from skin mass
(KU680475), case 5 from penile mass (KU680476), case 6 (KU680477) and case 10 (KU680478)
were from fresh tissue samples.Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV among diagnostic modalities: The
LINE1-c-myc PCR had a diagnostic sensitivity and NPV of 100% and a
specificity and PPV of over 80% (Table
3).
Table 3.
Comparison between PCR and conventional method (cytology and
histopathology)
Cytology
Histopathology
Positive
Negative
Total
Positive
Negative
Total
PCR assay
Positive
61
4
65
61
2
63
Negative
0
9
9
0
9
9
Total
61
13
74
61
11
72
Sensitivity
100.0%
100.0%
Specificity
66.7%
81.8%
PPV
93.9%
96.8%
NPV
100.0%
100.0%
Signalments and clinical information of CTVT dogs: From the 65 CTVT
bearing dogs, as determined by the LINE1-c-myc PCR assay, the majority were
2–5 old (61.8%) and intact genitalia males (40.0%). Mongrel (95.4%) and homeless (69.2%)
dogs were the main categories of dogs in this group. The TVTs were located at the external
genital area (GTVT; 60.0%) more often than at the extragenital area (ETVT; 40.0%). The most
common sites of ETVT were at the skin (46.2%), nasal cavity (34.6%), lymph node (11.5%),
oral cavity (3.9%) and rectum (3.9%). Among them, four dogs (6.2%) had previously been
treated with vincristine sulfate (VCL) intravenously with no response and so were considered
to have VCL-resistant TVT (Table 4).
Table 4.
Signalment (age, sex, breed and status), anatomical sites and history of
vincristine sulfate treatment in CTVT bearing dogs
Variable
Dogs
Age (years)(n=65)
< 2
2/34 (5.9%)
2 to 5
21/34 (61.8%)
6 to 9
6/34 (17.7%)
>9
5/34 (14.7%)
Unknown (n=37)
Sex (n=65)
Male/ intact
26/64 (40.0%)
Male/ castrated
6/65 (9.2%)
Female/ intact
22/65 (33.9%)
Female/ spayed
11/65 (16.9%)
Breed group (n=65)
Mongrel
62/65 (95.4%)
Labrador retriever
1/65 (1.54%)
Poodle
1/65 (1.54%)
Siberian huski
1/65 (1.54%)
Status (n=65)
Homeless dog
45/65 (69.2%)
Owner (Free-ranging dog)
20/65 (30.8%)
Anatomical site lesion (n=65)
External genital area (GTVT)
39/65 (60.0%)
Extragenital area (ETVT)
26/65 (40.0%)
- Skin
12/26 (46.2%)
- Nasal
9/26 (34.6%)
- Oral
1/26 (3.9%)
- Lymph node
3/26 (11.5%)
- Rectum
1/26 (3.9%)
Previous history of chemotherapy
Yes
4/65 (resistant) (6.2%)
No
61/65 (93.9%)
DISCUSSION
Sixty-five samples of dogs showed the previously reported [8] specific 550 bp LINE-c-myc PCR product and so were diagnosed
as CTVT. Phylogenetic analysis of the specific 550 bp amplicons from 10 of these samples
revealed a high similarity to those in the Genbank database for CTVT samples from Israel,
Taiwan and Japan (Fig. 4). There was no difference
in the sample clustering between the different tumor anatomical sites (GTVT and ETVT) or
known (normal and VCL-resistant CTVT cells). One possible explanation is that the molecular
characteristic of CTVT in Thailand has the same clonal origin as CTVT cases all around the
world [14], since this feature is found in normal and
VCL-resistant CTVT cells.Phylogenetic tree of the LINE-c-myc CTVT sequence of this study and
the related sequences from the Genbank database. CTVT from Thailand sequences: FNA
sample (triangle) sequences of KU680469 (case 1), KU680470 (case 2), KU680471 (case
7), KU680472 (case 11 in Table 2) and
KU680473 (case 8); and fresh tissue samples (circle) from KU680474 (case 4), KU680475
(case 5, skin mass), KU680476 (case 5, penile mass), KU680477 (case 6) and KU680478
(case 10). CTVT samples in Genbank: Canis lupus familiaris LINE-1
elememt DNA partial sequence (AB012217), LINE/c-myc junction sequence
(S55298), Canis familiarisc-myc gene partial
sequence (AY032723), Dogc-myc oncogene DNA with a retroposon
insertion target sequence (M37386) and Dogc-myc oncogene with an
inserted retroposon (M37385).Clinically, CTVT is recognized by its morphological features and location at the external
genital area. However, those CTVTs in the extragenital mass are controversial and hard to
diagnose. The LINE-c-myc gene rearrangement in the CTVT genome, which the
PCR based diagnostic assay is based on, is the only thing that is consistently different
from other tumor and normal dog cells, so detection of the LINE-c-myc gene
rearrangement by PCR is a potential diagnostic tool for CTVT [8, 14]. This study aimed to improve the
accuracy of CTVT diagnosis by applying conventional, cytological and histological analyses,
along with the PCR based LINE-c-myc detection assay to remove the ambiguity
of imprecise CTVT diagnosis, especially for round cell tumors. The results support that this
PCR assay could make a definitive diagnosis for all CTVT cases. Moreover, the advantage of
the PCR assay was its sensitivity (10 ng of DNA), which is important for
detection in the nasal cavity mass or at other sites where a biopsy is difficult to perform,
since the FNA yields enough cells for the PCR assay. Sensitivity of this assay can get PCR
result when use only 10 ng of CTVT DNA.The majority of the 65 CTVT dogs in this study were 2–5 years old and with intact genitals
(not castrated or spayed). The age is related to the route of transmission via coitus or
other social behavior, in that intact and mature dogs may have a relatively high sexual
activity [5, 12] and so exposure risk. Nearly all of the CTVT dogs in this study were mongrel
breed (62/65), consistent with but not conclusive for the previous study that homeless dogs
or mixed breed dogs seem to be exposed to CTVT to higher level and the tumor is usually
located in the genital area [1, 3, 4]. Interestingly, the higher
number of ETVT cases found in this study (40.0%) reveals the help to clinicians in achieving
an accurate diagnosis.Normally, the CTVT cell morphology is uniformly round to polyhedral shaped cells with a
central or eccentrical nucleus, prominent nucleoli, a vacuolated cytoplasm and moderate
mitotic figures [13]. Canine histiocytoma is also a
round cell tumor that contains a vacuolated cytoplasm [6], and so with these similar characteristics. It is possible that ETVT may be
misdiagnosed as a histiocytoma by cytological and histological analyses without the
LINE-c-myc based PCR assay, as seen in case 16 in this study (Table 2). From the cytology, the ETVT cells were
pleomorphic round to ovoid shaped cells, with eccentrically amphophilic round to ovoid
nuclei and a moderate amount of cytoplasm. Some cells contained small vacuoles in the
cytoplasm (Fig. 2B). Indeed, previous reports have
shown no difference between the IHC characteristics of histiocytoma and CTVT [5, 11, 12, 16].
Surprisingly, these tumor cells were negative result for lysozyme, but give a clear
diagnostic result in the LINE-c-myc PCR assay and so were diagnosed as
ETVT. Thus, this PCR assay can be used as a definitive diagnostic tool. In contrast to a
previous study, some samples had larger (e.g. case 12, Table 2) that looked like squamous cells. In addition to CTVT cells, lymphoma is
round cell tumors and similar to histiocytic tumors. To make a definitive diagnosis of
lymphoma, IHC analysis with CD3 and PAX-5 antibodies will need to be performed along with
the LINE-c-myc PCR assay [2, 18].Nevertheless, a false negative result or ladder feature of the PCR reaction may be found,
which is probably caused by impropriate sample collection and DNA degradation during
storage. Due to the small sample size in this study, further sample collection and analysis
are required to make an accurate diagnosis protocol or method for other tumors. However, at
present, we suggest that the LINE1-c-myc PCR assay can be used for
definitive CTVT diagnosis in conjunction with and not as a replacement for the conventional
cytological and histopathological, based analyses. The advantages of this diagnostic PCR
assay in requiring a low amount of DNA, and hence a relatively low number of cells, could be
applied to diagnose cases where only a small amount of sample could be collected or any
other reason that prevents the standard histopathological and cytological analyses.
Moreover, it can be used as a surveillance protocol during (and after) chemotherapeutic
treatment to determine the appropriate time to stop (or restart) the chemotherapy where the
cancer has regressed but left a bulk of fibrous tissue behind, such as in the chronic
inflammation tissue of the penis after chemotherapy treatment (data not shown). In
conclusion, the conventional histological and cytological based analyses should be performed
along with the LINE-c-myc PCR assay to improve the accuracy of diagnosis.
However, the tendency of false negative PCR results due to DNA degradation and/or poor
sample collection is not resolved, and further studies will focus on these issues.