Jacob A Miller1, Ehsan H Balagamwala2, Lilyana Angelov3,4, John H Suh2,3, Toufik Djemil5, Anthony Magnelli2, Peng Qi2, Tingliang Zhuang2, Andrew Godley2, Samuel T Chao2,3. 1. 1 Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 2. 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 3. 3 Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 4. 4 Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 5. 5 Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite advancements in local and systemic therapy, metastasis remains common in the natural history of sarcomas. Unfortunately, such metastases are the most significant source of morbidity and mortality in this heterogeneous disease. As a classically radioresistant histology, stereotactic radiosurgery has emerged to control spinal sarcomas and provide palliation. However, there is a lack of data regarding pain relief and relapse following stereotactic radiosurgery. METHODS: We queried a retrospective institutional database of patients who underwent spine stereotactic radiosurgery for primary and metastatic sarcomas. The primary outcome was pain relief following stereotactic radiosurgery. Secondary outcomes included progression of pain, radiographic failure, and development of toxicities following treatment. RESULTS: Forty treatment sites were eligible for inclusion; the median prescription dose was 16 Gy in a single fraction. Median time to radiographic failure was 14 months. At 6 and 12 months, radiographic control was 63% and 51%, respectively. Among patients presenting with pain, median time to pain relief was 1 month. Actuarial pain relief at 6 months was 82%. Median time to pain progression was 10 months; at 12 months, actuarial pain progression was 51%. Following multivariate analysis, presence of neurologic deficit at consult (hazard ratio: 2.48, P < .01) and presence of extraspinal bone metastases (hazard ratio: 2.83, P < .01) were associated with pain relief. Greater pain at consult (hazard ratio: 1.92, P < .01), prior radiotherapy (hazard ratio: 4.65, P = .02), and greater number of irradiated vertebral levels were associated with pain progression. CONCLUSIONS: Local treatment of spinal sarcomas has remained a challenge for decades, with poor rates of local control and limited pain relief following conventional radiotherapy. In this series, pain relief was achieved in 82% of treatments at 6 months, with half of patients experiencing pain progression by 12 months. Given minimal toxicity and suboptimal pain control at 12 months, dose escalation beyond 16 Gy is warranted.
PURPOSE: Despite advancements in local and systemic therapy, metastasis remains common in the natural history of sarcomas. Unfortunately, such metastases are the most significant source of morbidity and mortality in this heterogeneous disease. As a classically radioresistant histology, stereotactic radiosurgery has emerged to control spinal sarcomas and provide palliation. However, there is a lack of data regarding pain relief and relapse following stereotactic radiosurgery. METHODS: We queried a retrospective institutional database of patients who underwent spine stereotactic radiosurgery for primary and metastatic sarcomas. The primary outcome was pain relief following stereotactic radiosurgery. Secondary outcomes included progression of pain, radiographic failure, and development of toxicities following treatment. RESULTS: Forty treatment sites were eligible for inclusion; the median prescription dose was 16 Gy in a single fraction. Median time to radiographic failure was 14 months. At 6 and 12 months, radiographic control was 63% and 51%, respectively. Among patients presenting with pain, median time to pain relief was 1 month. Actuarial pain relief at 6 months was 82%. Median time to pain progression was 10 months; at 12 months, actuarial pain progression was 51%. Following multivariate analysis, presence of neurologic deficit at consult (hazard ratio: 2.48, P < .01) and presence of extraspinal bone metastases (hazard ratio: 2.83, P < .01) were associated with pain relief. Greater pain at consult (hazard ratio: 1.92, P < .01), prior radiotherapy (hazard ratio: 4.65, P = .02), and greater number of irradiated vertebral levels were associated with pain progression. CONCLUSIONS: Local treatment of spinal sarcomas has remained a challenge for decades, with poor rates of local control and limited pain relief following conventional radiotherapy. In this series, pain relief was achieved in 82% of treatments at 6 months, with half of patients experiencing pain progression by 12 months. Given minimal toxicity and suboptimal pain control at 12 months, dose escalation beyond 16 Gy is warranted.
Authors: Thomas M Atkinson; Barry D Rosenfeld; Laura Sit; Tito R Mendoza; Mike Fruscione; Dawn Lavene; Mary Shaw; Yuelin Li; Jennifer Hay; Charles S Cleeland; Howard I Scher; William S Breitbart; Ethan Basch Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2010-12-04 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Samuel Ryu; Jian-Yue Jin; Ryan Jin; Jack Rock; Munther Ajlouni; Benjamin Movsas; Mark Rosenblum; Jae Ho Kim Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Peter S Rose; Ilya Laufer; Patrick J Boland; Andrew Hanover; Mark H Bilsky; Josh Yamada; Eric Lis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ernest C Borden; Laurence H Baker; Robert S Bell; Vivien Bramwell; George D Demetri; Burton L Eisenberg; Christopher D M Fletcher; Jonathan A Fletcher; Marc Ladanyi; Paul Meltzer; Brian O'Sullivan; David R Parkinson; Peter W T Pisters; Scott Saxman; Samuel Singer; Murali Sundaram; Allan T van Oosterom; Jaap Verweij; Jill Waalen; Sharon W Weiss; Murray F Brennan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ehsan H Balagamwala; Jacob A Miller; Chandana A Reddy; Lilyana Angelov; John H Suh; Muhammad B Tariq; Erin S Murphy; Kailin Yang; Toufik Djemil; Anthony Magnelli; Alireza M Mohammadi; Sherry Soeder; Samuel T Chao Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Christopher L Tinkle; Charu Singh; Shane Lloyd; Yian Guo; Yimei Li; Alberto S Pappo; Steven G DuBois; John T Lucas; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Stephanie A Terezakis; Steve E Braunstein; Matthew J Krasin Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-11-28 Impact factor: 7.038