| Literature DB >> 27074466 |
Yanan Sun1, Hong Ge, Siguo Cheng, Chengliang Yang, Qianqian Zhu, Dingjie Li, Yuan Tian.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine interfractional variation of the centroid position and volume of internal target volume (ITV) during stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of lung cancer. From January 2014 to August 2014, a total of 32 patients with 37 primary or metastatic lung tumors were enrolled in our study. All patients received SBRT treatment in 4-5 fractions to a median dose of 48 Gy. Both 3D CT and 4D CT scans were used for radiotherapy treatment planning. 3D CBCT was acquired prior to treatment delivery to verify patient positioning. A total of 163 3D CBCT images were available for evaluation. 3D CBCT scans acquired for verification were registered with simulation CT scans. The ITVs were contoured on all verification 3D CBCT scans and compared to the initial gross target volume (GTV) or ITV in treatment planning system. GTV was based on 3D CT while ITV was based on both 3D CT and 4D CT. To assess the interfractional variation of ITV centroid position, we used vertebrae body adja-cent to the tumor as reference point when performing the registration procedure. To eliminate the effect of time on tumor volume between simulation CT scan and the first fraction, the interfractional variation of ITV was evaluated from the first fraction to the last fraction. The overall 3D vector shift was 4.4 ± 2.5 mm (range: 0.4-13.8 mm). The interfractional variation of ITV centroid position in superior-inferior, anterior-posterior, and left-right directions were -0.7 ± 2.7 mm, -1.4 ± 3.4 mm, and -0.5 ± 2.2 mm, respectively. No significant difference was observed between three directions (p = 0.147). Large interfractional variations (≥ 5 mm) were observed in 12 fractions (9.3%) in superior-inferior direction, 24 fractions (18.6%) in anterior-posterior direction, and 5 fractions (3.9%) in left-right direction. No time trend of tumor volume change measured in 3D CBCT was detected during four fractions (p = 0.074). A significant (p = 0.010) time trend was detected when evaluating the time trend of ITV change during 5 fractions and diameter was found to be significantly correlated with the ITV change (p = 0.000). ITV did not show significant regression during SBRT treatment, but interfractional variation in the ITV centroid position was observed, especially in anterior-posterior direc-tion. An isotropic margin of 7 mm around ITV might be necessary for adequate coverage of interfractional variation of ITV centroid position, but only in case no soft tissue-based setup is performed during SBRT treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27074466 PMCID: PMC5874940 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5835
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys ISSN: 1526-9914 Impact factor: 2.102
Figure 1Example of the ITV combined definition of an early stage non‐small cell lung cancer. The delineations of tumor volume were projected to AIP images. The red line represents GTV 3D, the yellow line represents ITVmip, and green line represents ITVcombined, which is the combination of GTV 3D and ITVmip. We can see from the upper‐left picture that GTV 3D cannot encompass the full range of tumor volume, but ITVmip can cover the tumor volume to a large extent.
Figure 23D vector shift of tumor centroid position with elapsed time. The height of each bar represents the mean 3D vector shift of each fraction. Vertical lines represent the 95% error bars. *Because 15 tumors received the 5th fraction of SBRT, the fifth bar represents only this group of patients.
Figure 3The interfractional variation of ITV centroid position in SI direction. Each color represents the interfraction variation of tumor position of one patient with elapsed time. The ITV centroid position of simulation was used as reference.
Figure 4The interfractional variation of ITV centroid position in the AP direction. Each color represents the interfraction variation of tumor position of one patient with elapsed time. The ITV centroid position of simulation was used as reference.
Figure 5The interfractional variation of ITV centroid position in LR direction. Each color represents the interfraction variation of tumor position of one patient with elapsed time. The ITV centroid position of simulation was used as reference.
The percentage of ITV shrinkage in all tumors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pre‐fraction 2 |
| 16.0% |
| 28.6% |
| pre‐fraction 3 |
| 24.2% |
| 31.5% |
| pre‐fraction 4 | 4.0% | 28.1% |
| 59.5% |
| pre‐fraction 5 | 5.2% | 20.7% |
| 35.8% |
a Only 15 tumors were available for evaluating the percentage of ITV shrinkage before the 5th fraction of SBRT.
The percentage of ITV shrinkage in tumors with diameter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pre‐fraction 2 |
| 11.3% |
| 10.3% |
| pre‐fraction 3 |
| 17.6% |
| 15.8% |
| pre‐fraction 4 | 7.9% | 28.4% |
| 59.5% |
| pre‐fraction 5 | 4.1% | 21.1% |
| 35.8% |
a Only 15 tumors were available for evaluating the percentage of ITV shrinkage before the 5th fraction of SBRT.
The percentage of ITV shrinkage in tumors with diameter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pre‐fraction 2 |
| 18.0% |
| 28.6% |
| pre‐fraction 3 |
| 27.3% |
| 31.5% |
| pre‐fraction 4 | 2.2% | 28.3% |
| 43.1% |
| pre‐fraction 5a | 5.9% | 21.4% |
| 33.7% |
a Only 15 tumors were available for evaluating the percentage of ITV shrinkage before the 5th fraction of SBRT.