| Literature DB >> 27074252 |
Rosalía Pérez-Castro1, Jaime E Castellanos1, Víctor A Olano2, María Inés Matiz2, Juan F Jaramillo2, Sandra L Vargas2, Diana M Sarmiento2, Thor Axel Stenström3, Hans J Overgaard4.
Abstract
The Aedes aegypti vector for dengue virus (DENV) has been reported in urban and periurban areas. The information about DENV circulation in mosquitoes in Colombian rural areas is limited, so we aimed to evaluate the presence of DENV in Ae. aegypti females caught in rural locations of two Colombian municipalities, Anapoima and La Mesa. Mosquitoes from 497 rural households in 44 different rural settlements were collected. Pools of about 20 Ae. aegypti females were processed for DENV serotype detection. DENV in mosquitoes was detected in 74% of the analysed settlements with a pool positivity rate of 62%. The estimated individual mosquito infection rate was 4.12% and the minimum infection rate was 33.3/1,000 mosquitoes. All four serotypes were detected; the most frequent being DENV-2 (50%) and DENV-1 (35%). Two-three serotypes were detected simultaneously in separate pools. This is the first report on the co-occurrence of natural DENV infection of mosquitoes in Colombian rural areas. The findings are important for understanding dengue transmission and planning control strategies. A potential latent virus reservoir in rural areas could spill over to urban areas during population movements. Detecting DENV in wild-caught adult mosquitoes should be included in the development of dengue epidemic forecasting models.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27074252 PMCID: PMC4830112 DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760150363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz ISSN: 0074-0276 Impact factor: 2.743
Fig. 1: flux diagram showing the sample processing. DENV: dengue virus.
Number of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes collected from households in settlements in the municipalities of Anapoima and La Mesa, department of Cundinamarca, Colombia
| Anapoima | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Settlement | Inspected households/ settlement (n) |
| Female mosquito pool (n) | DENV serotype | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| Males (n) | Females (n) | Female density | Individual mosquitoes/ pool | Analysed | DENV positive | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| La Chica | 11 | 15 | 17 | 1.55 | 17 | 1 | 1 | X | X | - | - |
| Andalucia | 10 | 9 | 3 | 0.30 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Calichana | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Golconda | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0.14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| La Esmeralda | 10 | 6 | 1 | 0.10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| La Esperanza | 5 | 2 | 7 | 1.40 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Panama | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0.10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Inspeccion San Antonio | 24 | 112 | 157 | 6.54 | 60 | 3 | 1 | - | X | - | - |
| El Rosario | 9 | 9 | 8 | 0.89 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| La Guasima | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1.00 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Palmichera | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Santa Ana | 10 | 29 | 29 | 2.90 | 20 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | X |
| Lutaima | 10 | 27 | 29 | 2.90 | 20 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| El Cabral | 6 | 14 | 11 | 1.83 | 14 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| El Consuelo | 10 | 20 | 10 | 1.00 | 10 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| El Copial | 6 | 4 | 8 | 1.33 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| El Higueron | 6 | 44 | 98 | 16.33 | 20 | 1 | 1 | - | X | - | - |
| Las Mercedes | 11 | 8 | 23 | 2.09 | 20 | 1 | 1 | - | X | - | - |
| Santa Lucia | 5 | 89 | 114 | 22.08 | 40 | 2 | 1 | - | X | - | X |
| Patio Bonito | 20 | 51 | 35 | 1.75 | 20 | 1 | 1 | X | - | - | - |
| La Paz | 17 | 9 | 13 | 0.76 | 13 | 1 | 1 | - | X | - | - |
| San Judas | 2 | 25 | 31 | 15.50 | 20 | 1 | 1 | X | X | - | - |
| Total | 200 | 482 | 601 | 3.01 | 271 | 15 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| La Mesa | |||||||||||
| Settlement | Inspected households/ settlement (n) |
| Female mosquito pool (n) | DENV serotype | |||||||
| Males (n) | Females (n) | Female density | Individual mosquitoes/ pool | Analysed | DENV positive | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| Anatoli | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Payacal | 18 | 9 | 10 | 0.56 | 10 | 1 | 1 | X | - | - | - |
| Buenavista | 7 | 19 | 21 | 3.00 | 20 | 1 | 1 | - | X | - | - |
| Inspeccion San Joaquin | 50 | 155 | 148 | 2.96 | 60 | 3 | 2 | X | X | - | X |
| La Concha | 11 | 63 | 21 | 1.91 | 20 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| La Vega | 10 | 13 | 4 | 0.40 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ojo de Agua | 10 | 34 | 66 | 6.60 | 20 | 1 | 1 | - | X | - | - |
| Capata | 10 | 28 | 48 | 4.80 | 40 | 2 | 1 | X | - | - | - |
| Inspeccion San Javier | 22 | 39 | 50 | 2.27 | 20 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Alto del Frisol | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Inspeccion La Esperanza | 26 | 15 | 9 | 0.35 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Doima | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Campo Santo | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.00 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Florian | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Alto de las Flores | 10 | 30 | 22 | 2.20 | 20 | 1 | 1 | X | X | - | - |
| Laguna Verde | 10 | 46 | 43 | 4.30 | 20 | 1 | 1 | - | X | - | - |
| Laguna Nueva | 6 | 142 | 135 | 22.50 | 40 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - |
| San Esteban | 10 | 171 | 125 | 12.50 | 20 | 1 | 1 | X | - | - | - |
| Santa Barbara | 10 | 21 | 12 | 1.20 | 12 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Guayabal | 14 | 10 | 18 | 1.29 | 18 | 1 | 1 | - | X | - | - |
| Zapata | 14 | 20 | 36 | 2.57 | 20 | 1 | 1 | - | - | X | - |
| Hungria | 7 | 53 | 28 | 4.00 | 20 | 1 | 1 | X | - | - | - |
| Total | 297 | 869 | 797 | 2.68 | 360 | 19 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 |
a: inspección is a settlement with clustered houses in a confined area. More houses were sampled in these; DENV: dengue virus.
Fig. 2: agarose gels showing the amplification products generated from reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using RNA isolated fromAedes aegypti mosquito pools (from 10-20 mosquitoes in each) collected from settlements in Anapoima (panel A) and La Mesa (panel B). Detected dengue virus (DENV) serotypes are shown in parentheses. A: Anapoima. Lanes 1, 10: 100 bp marker; 2: La Chica (DENV-1 and DENV-2); 3: San Antonio 1 (Neg); 4: San Antonio 2 (Neg); 5: San Antonio 3 (DENV-2); 6: Santa Ana (DENV-4); 7: Lutaima (Neg); 8: El Cabral (Neg); 9: El Consuelo (Neg); 11: El Higuerón (DENV-2); 12: Las Mercedes (DENV-2); 13: Santa Lucia (DENV-2 and DENV-4); 14: Patio Bonito (DENV-1); 15: La Paz (DENV-2); 16: San Judas (DENV-1 and DENV-2); 17: Negative control; DV1-DV4: positive controls for DENV-1 to DENV-4; B: La Mesa. 1, 14: 100 bp marker; 2: Payacal (DENV-1); 3: Buenavista (DENV-2); 4: San Joaquín 1 (DENV-1); 5: San Joaquín 2 (Neg); 6: San Joaquín 3 (DENV-2 and DENV-4); 7: La Concha (Neg); 8: Ojo de Agua (DENV-2); 9: Cápata 1 (DENV-1); 10: Cápata 2 (Neg); 11: San Javier (Neg); 12: Alto de las Flores (DENV-1 and DENV-2); 13: Laguna Verde (DENV-2); 15: Laguna Nueva 1 (Neg.); 16: Laguna Nueva 2 (Neg); 17: San Esteban (DENV-1); 18: Santa Bárbara (Neg); 19: Guayabal (DENV-2); 20: Zapata (DENV-3); 21: Hungría (DENV-1); 22: Negative control; DV1-DV4: positive controls for DENV-1 to DENV-4; Neg: no DENV detected.
Fig. 3: map of the municipalities of Anapoima and La Mesa, department of Cundinamarca, Colombia, showing rural localities where dengue virus (DENV) serotypes were detected in Aedes aegypti female mosquito pools. Mosquitoes collected in July 2012 and April 2013.