Literature DB >> 22014050

Quantification of extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: different parameters correlated to biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Bianca A M H van Veggel1, Inge M van Oort, J Alfred Witjes, Lambertus A L M Kiemeney, Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa.   

Abstract

AIMS: Different methods to substage extraprostatic extension (EPE) were correlated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 157 consecutive RP specimens with EPE were completely embedded. Twenty-three patients with adjuvant therapy or detectable postoperative PSA levels were excluded, leaving 134 patients for BCR analysis. Data were analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses. In univariate analysis, maximal radial distance (RD) was associated with BCR as continuous (P = 0.006) and dichotomous (P = 0.002) parameters. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of BCR were preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (P = 0.006), Gleason score (P = 0.001), positive surgical margins (P = 0.005), maximal RD dichotomized at 0.6 mm [= one high-power field (HPF)]; hazard ratio (HR) 3.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48-7.85; P = 0.004), total RD (P = 0.009) and EPE quantification according to Epstein (P = 0.002) and to Wheeler (P = 0.004). The 5-year risk of BCR was 20% (95% CI 0.65-0.94) in patients with RD ≤ 0.6 mm and 47% (95% CI: 0.41-0.65) with RD > 0.6 mm. The restriction of focal EPE in no more than two slides (Epstein and Wheeler) gave no better results.
CONCLUSIONS: Maximal RD dichotomized at one HPF is an objective method to subdivide EPE and a strong, independent predictor for BCR after RP. Its use is recommended for substaging pT3a in future TNM classifications. 2011 Blackwell Publishing Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22014050     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03986.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  4 in total

1.  Impact of the extent of extraprostatic extension defined by Epstein's method in patients with negative surgical margins and negative lymph node invasion.

Authors:  T Maubon; N Branger; C Bastide; G Lonjon; K-A Harvey-Bryan; P Validire; S Giusiano; D Rossi; X Cathelineau; F Rozet
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.554

2.  The Significance of Accurate Determination of Gleason Score for Therapeutic Options and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Burkhard Helpap; Daniel Ringli; Jens Tonhauser; Immanuel Poser; Jürgen Breul; Heidrun Gevensleben; Hans-Helge Seifert
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  ERG rearrangement as a novel marker for predicting the extra-prostatic extension of clinically localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  L I Lu; Hao Zhang; Jun Pang; Guo-Liang Hou; Min-Hua Lu; Xin Gao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  The relationship between amount of extra-prostatic extension and length of capsular contact: performances from MR images and radical prostatectomy specimens

Authors:  Aslıhan Onay; Barış Bakır
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 0.973

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.