Ken C L Wong1, Michael Tee1,2, Marcus Chen3, David A Bluemke1, Ronald M Summers1, Jianhua Yao4. 1. Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. 2. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 3. Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Branch, NHLBI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. jyao@cc.nih.gov.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Regional infarction identification is important for heart disease diagnosis and management, and myocardial deformation has been shown to be effective for this purpose. Although tagged and strain-encoded MR images can provide such measurements, they are uncommon in clinical routine. On the contrary, cardiac CT images are more available with lower costs, but they only provide motion of cardiac boundaries and additional constraints are required to obtain the myocardial strains. The goal of this study is to verify the potential of contrast-enhanced CT images on computer-aided regional infarction identification. METHODS: We propose a biomechanical approach combined with machine learning algorithms. A hyperelastic biomechanical model is used with deformable image registration to estimate 3D myocardial strains from CT images. The regional strains and CT image intensities are input to a classifier for regional infarction identification. Cross-validations on ten canine image sequences with artificially induced infarctions were used to study the performances of using different feature combinations and machine learning algorithms. RESULTS: Radial strain, circumferential strain, first principal strain, and image intensity were shown to be discriminative features. The highest identification accuracy ([Formula: see text] %) was achieved when combining radial strain with image intensity. Random forests gave better results than support vector machines on less discriminative features. Random forests also performed better when all strains were used together. CONCLUSION: Although CT images cannot directly measure myocardial deformation, with the use of a biomechanical model, the estimated strains can provide promising identification results especially when combined with CT image intensity.
PURPOSE: Regional infarction identification is important for heart disease diagnosis and management, and myocardial deformation has been shown to be effective for this purpose. Although tagged and strain-encoded MR images can provide such measurements, they are uncommon in clinical routine. On the contrary, cardiac CT images are more available with lower costs, but they only provide motion of cardiac boundaries and additional constraints are required to obtain the myocardial strains. The goal of this study is to verify the potential of contrast-enhanced CT images on computer-aided regional infarction identification. METHODS: We propose a biomechanical approach combined with machine learning algorithms. A hyperelastic biomechanical model is used with deformable image registration to estimate 3D myocardial strains from CT images. The regional strains and CT image intensities are input to a classifier for regional infarction identification. Cross-validations on ten canine image sequences with artificially induced infarctions were used to study the performances of using different feature combinations and machine learning algorithms. RESULTS: Radial strain, circumferential strain, first principal strain, and image intensity were shown to be discriminative features. The highest identification accuracy ([Formula: see text] %) was achieved when combining radial strain with image intensity. Random forests gave better results than support vector machines on less discriminative features. Random forests also performed better when all strains were used together. CONCLUSION: Although CT images cannot directly measure myocardial deformation, with the use of a biomechanical model, the estimated strains can provide promising identification results especially when combined with CT image intensity.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Albert C Lardo; Marco A S Cordeiro; Caterina Silva; Luciano C Amado; Richard T George; Anastasios P Saliaris; Karl H Schuleri; Veronica R Fernandes; Menekhem Zviman; Saman Nazarian; Henry R Halperin; Katherine C Wu; Joshua M Hare; Joao A C Lima Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-01-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: K Sudarshan Vidya; E Y K Ng; U Rajendra Acharya; Siaw Meng Chou; Ru San Tan; Dhanjoo N Ghista Journal: Comput Biol Med Date: 2015-04-10 Impact factor: 4.589
Authors: Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Maarten L Simoons; Bernard R Chaitman; Harvey D White; Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Harvey D White; Allan S Jaffe; Hugo A Katus; Fred S Apple; Bertil Lindahl; David A Morrow; Bernard R Chaitman; Peter M Clemmensen; Per Johanson; Hanoch Hod; Richard Underwood; Jeroen J Bax; Jeroen J Bonow; Fausto Pinto; Raymond J Gibbons; Keith A Fox; Dan Atar; L Kristin Newby; Marcello Galvani; Christian W Hamm; Barry F Uretsky; Ph Gabriel Steg; William Wijns; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Phillippe Menasche; Jan Ravkilde; E Magnus Ohman; Elliott M Antman; Lars C Wallentin; Paul W Armstrong; Maarten L Simoons; James L Januzzi; Markku S Nieminen; Mihai Gheorghiade; Gerasimos Filippatos; Russell V Luepker; Stephen P Fortmann; Wayne D Rosamond; Dan Levy; David Wood; Sidney C Smith; Dayi Hu; Jose-Luis Lopez-Sendon; Rose Marie Robertson; Douglas Weaver; Michal Tendera; Alfred A Bove; Alexander N Parkhomenko; Elena J Vasilieva; Shanti Mendis; Jeroen J Bax; Helmut Baumgartner; Claudio Ceconi; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Robert Fagard; Christian Funck-Brentano; David Hasdai; Arno Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Theresa McDonagh; Cyril Moulin; Bogdan A Popescu; Zeljko Reiner; Udo Sechtem; Per Anton Sirnes; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; Alec Vahanian; Stephan Windecker; Joao Morais; Carlos Aguiar; Wael Almahmeed; David O Arnar; Fabio Barili; Kenneth D Bloch; Ann F Bolger; Hans Erik Botker; Biykem Bozkurt; Raffaele Bugiardini; Christopher Cannon; James de Lemos; Franz R Eberli; Edgardo Escobar; Mark Hlatky; Stefan James; Karl B Kern; David J Moliterno; Christian Mueller; Aleksandar N Neskovic; Burkert Mathias Pieske; Steven P Schulman; Robert F Storey; Kathryn A Taubert; Pascal Vranckx; Daniel R Wagner Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Kumaradevan Punithakumar; Ismail Ben Ayed; Ali Islam; Aashish Goela; Ian G Ross; Jaron Chong; Shuo Li Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Davis M Vigneault; Amir Pourmorteza; Marvin L Thomas; David A Bluemke; J Alison Noble Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Mir Henglin; Gillian Stein; Pavel V Hushcha; Jasper Snoek; Alexander B Wiltschko; Susan Cheng Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Carlos Martin-Isla; Victor M Campello; Cristian Izquierdo; Zahra Raisi-Estabragh; Bettina Baeßler; Steffen E Petersen; Karim Lekadir Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2020-01-24
Authors: Orod Razeghi; Mattias Heinrich; Thomas E Fastl; Cesare Corrado; Rashed Karim; Adelaide De Vecchi; Tom Banks; Patrick Donnelly; Jonathan M Behar; Justin Gould; Ronak Rajani; Christopher A Rinaldi; Steven Niederer Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Hugh O'Brien; John Whitaker; Baldeep Singh Sidhu; Justin Gould; Tanja Kurzendorfer; Mark D O'Neill; Ronak Rajani; Karine Grigoryan; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi; Jonathan Taylor; Kawal Rhode; Peter Mountney; Steven Niederer Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2021-07-02