Katie Abley1, James C W Locke1, H M Ottoline Leyser2. 1. The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Bateman Street, Cambridge CB2 1LR, UK. 2. The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Bateman Street, Cambridge CB2 1LR, UK ol235@cam.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Discussions of phenotypic robustness often consider scenarios where invariant phenotypes are optimal and assume that developmental mechanisms have evolved to buffer the phenotypes of specific traits against stochastic and environmental perturbations. However, plastic plant phenotypes that vary between environments or variable phenotypes that vary stochastically within an environment may also be advantageous in some scenarios. SCOPE: Here the conditions under which invariant, plastic and variable phenotypes of specific traits may confer a selective advantage in plants are examined. Drawing on work from microbes and multicellular organisms, the mechanisms that may give rise to each type of phenotype are discussed. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the view of robustness as being the ability of a genotype to produce a single, invariant phenotype, changes in a phenotype in response to the environment, or phenotypic variability within an environment, may also be delivered consistently (i.e. robustly). Thus, for some plant traits, mechanisms have probably evolved to produce plasticity or variability in a reliable manner.
BACKGROUND: Discussions of phenotypic robustness often consider scenarios where invariant phenotypes are optimal and assume that developmental mechanisms have evolved to buffer the phenotypes of specific traits against stochastic and environmental perturbations. However, plastic plant phenotypes that vary between environments or variable phenotypes that vary stochastically within an environment may also be advantageous in some scenarios. SCOPE: Here the conditions under which invariant, plastic and variable phenotypes of specific traits may confer a selective advantage in plants are examined. Drawing on work from microbes and multicellular organisms, the mechanisms that may give rise to each type of phenotype are discussed. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the view of robustness as being the ability of a genotype to produce a single, invariant phenotype, changes in a phenotype in response to the environment, or phenotypic variability within an environment, may also be delivered consistently (i.e. robustly). Thus, for some plant traits, mechanisms have probably evolved to produce plasticity or variability in a reliable manner.
Authors: Heather M Meyer; José Teles; Pau Formosa-Jordan; Yassin Refahi; Rita San-Bento; Gwyneth Ingram; Henrik Jönsson; James C W Locke; Adrienne H K Roeder Journal: Elife Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Olivier Michaud; Anne-Sophie Fiorucci; Ioannis Xenarios; Christian Fankhauser Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-06-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Teresa Lenser; Kai Graeber; Özge Selin Cevik; Nezaket Adigüzel; Ali A Dönmez; Christopher Grosche; Marcel Kettermann; Sara Mayland-Quellhorst; Zsuzsanna Mérai; Setareh Mohammadin; Thu-Phuong Nguyen; Florian Rümpler; Christina Schulze; Katja Sperber; Tina Steinbrecher; Nils Wiegand; Miroslav Strnad; Ortrun Mittelsten Scheid; Stefan A Rensing; Michael Eric Schranz; Günter Theißen; Klaus Mummenhoff; Gerhard Leubner-Metzger Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Daniel Rodriguez-Leal; Cao Xu; Choon-Tak Kwon; Cara Soyars; Edgar Demesa-Arevalo; Jarrett Man; Lei Liu; Zachary H Lemmon; Daniel S Jones; Joyce Van Eck; David P Jackson; Madelaine E Bartlett; Zachary L Nimchuk; Zachary B Lippman Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 38.330