Literature DB >> 27071845

The genetic contribution to sex determination and number of sex chromosomes vary among populations of common frogs (Rana temporaria).

N Rodrigues1, Y Vuille1, A Brelsford1, J Merilä2, N Perrin1.   

Abstract

The patterns of sex determination and sex differentiation have been shown to differ among geographic populations of common frogs. Notably, the association between phenotypic sex and linkage group 2 (LG2) has been found to be perfect in a northern Swedish population, but weak and variable among families in a southern one. By analyzing these populations with markers from other linkage groups, we bring two new insights: (1) the variance in phenotypic sex not accounted for by LG2 in the southern population could not be assigned to genetic factors on other linkage groups, suggesting an epigenetic component to sex determination; (2) a second linkage group (LG7) was found to co-segregate with sex and LG2 in the northern population. Given the very short timeframe since post-glacial colonization (in the order of 1000 generations) and its seemingly localized distribution, this neo-sex chromosome system might be the youngest one described so far. It does not result from a fusion, but more likely from a reciprocal translocation between the original Y chromosome (LG2) and an autosome (LG7), causing their co-segregation during male meiosis. By generating a strict linkage between several important genes from the sex-determination cascade (Dmrt1, Amh and Amhr2), this neo-sex chromosome possibly contributes to the 'differentiated sex race' syndrome (strictly genetic sex determination and early gonadal development) that characterizes this northern population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27071845      PMCID: PMC4901354          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2016.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  36 in total

1.  A Y-linked anti-Müllerian hormone duplication takes over a critical role in sex determination.

Authors:  Ricardo S Hattori; Yu Murai; Miho Oura; Shuji Masuda; Sullip K Majhi; Takashi Sakamoto; Juan I Fernandino; Gustavo M Somoza; Masashi Yokota; Carlos A Strüssmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Temperature-dependent turnovers in sex-determination mechanisms: a quantitative model.

Authors:  Christine Grossen; Samuel Neuenschwander; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  High-density linkage maps fail to detect any genetic component to sex determination in a Rana temporaria family.

Authors:  A Brelsford; N Rodrigues; N Perrin
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Distribution of allelic frequencies in a finite population under stepwise production of neutral alleles.

Authors:  M Kimura; T Ohta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Sex reversal: a fountain of youth for sex chromosomes?

Authors:  Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Gonadal sex differentiation in frogs: how testes become shorter than ovaries.

Authors:  Katarzyna Haczkiewicz; Maria Ogielska
Journal:  Zoolog Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 0.931

7.  Evidence for heteromorphic sex chromosomes in males of Rana tagoi and Rana sakuraii in Nishitama district of Tokyo (Anura: Ranidae).

Authors:  M Ryuzaki; H Hanada; H Okumoto; N Takizawa; M Nishioka
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Sex differences in fitness and selection for centric fusions between sex-chromosomes and autosomes.

Authors:  D Charlesworth; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Chromosome landmarks and autosome-sex chromosome translocations in Rumex hastatulus, a plant with XX/XY1Y2 sex chromosome system.

Authors:  Aleksandra Grabowska-Joachimiak; Adam Kula; Tomasz Książczyk; Joanna Chojnicka; Elwira Sliwinska; Andrzej J Joachimiak
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Disentangling genetic vs. environmental causes of sex determination in the common frog, Rana temporaria.

Authors:  Chikako Matsuba; Ikuo Miura; Juha Merilä
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 2.797

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Demographic and genetic consequences of disturbed sex determination.

Authors:  Claus Wedekind
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Climate-driven shifts in adult sex ratios via sex reversals: the type of sex determination matters.

Authors:  Veronika Bókony; Szilvia Kövér; Edina Nemesházi; András Liker; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  More sex chromosomes than autosomes in the Amazonian frog Leptodactylus pentadactylus.

Authors:  T Gazoni; C F B Haddad; H Narimatsu; D C Cabral-de-Mello; M L Lyra; P P Parise-Maltempi
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 4.  Evolution of master sex determiners: TGF-β signalling pathways at regulatory crossroads.

Authors:  Qiaowei Pan; Tomas Kay; Alexandra Depincé; Mateus Adolfi; Manfred Schartl; Yann Guiguen; Amaury Herpin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 6.671

5.  Dmrt1 polymorphism covaries with sex-determination patterns in Rana temporaria.

Authors:  Wen-Juan Ma; Nicolas Rodrigues; Roberto Sermier; Alan Brelsford; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Sex-linked markers in the North American green frog (Rana clamitans) developed using DArTseq provide early insight into sex chromosome evolution.

Authors:  Max R Lambert; David K Skelly; Tariq Ezaz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Using conventional F-statistics to study unconventional sex-chromosome differentiation.

Authors:  Nicolas Rodrigues; Christophe Dufresnes
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Comparative High-Density Linkage Mapping Reveals Conserved Genome Structure but Variation in Levels of Heterochiasmy and Location of Recombination Cold Spots in the Common Frog.

Authors:  Gemma Palomar; Freed Ahmad; Anti Vasemägi; Chikako Matsuba; Alfredo G Nicieza; José Manuel Cano
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 9.  Sex Chromosome Evolution: So Many Exceptions to the Rules.

Authors:  Benjamin L S Furman; David C H Metzger; Iulia Darolti; Alison E Wright; Benjamin A Sandkam; Pedro Almeida; Jacelyn J Shu; Judith E Mank
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Male heterogametic sex determination in Rana dybowskii based on sex-linked molecular markers.

Authors:  Yuan Xu; Zhiheng DU; Jiayu Liu; Hang Su; Fangyong Ning; Shiquan Cui; Lijuan Wang; Jianming Liu; Chuanshuai Ren; Shengwei DI; Xiujuan Bai
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 2.083

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.