Literature DB >> 27071706

Third-generation inhibitors targeting EGFR T790M mutation in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Shuhang Wang1, Shundong Cang2, Delong Liu3,4.   

Abstract

The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are widely used in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, EGFR T790M mutation leads to resistance to most clinically available EGFR TKIs. Third-generation EGFR TKIs against the T790M mutation have been in active clinical development. These agents include osimertinib, rociletinib, HM61713, ASP8273, EGF816, and PF-06747775. Osimertinib and rociletinib have shown clinical efficacy in phase I/II trials in patients who had acquired resistance to first- or second-generation TKIs. Osimertinib (AZD9291, TAGRISSO) was recently approved by FDA for metastatic EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC. HM61713, ASP8237, EGF816, and PF-06747775 are still in early clinical development. This article reviews the emerging data regarding third-generation agents against EGFR T790M mutation in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27071706      PMCID: PMC4830020          DOI: 10.1186/s13045-016-0268-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 1756-8722            Impact factor:   17.388


Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85 % of all lung cancers. The 5-year survival rate in advanced NSCLC patients is less than 5 %. The activating mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) occur in approximately 10–15 % of NSCLC cases in Caucasian patients and approximately 30–40 % in East Asian patients [1, 2]. The first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib, have been widely used for these advanced NSCLC patients [3-5]. However, acquired resistance to these inhibitors frequently develops after a median of 9 to 13 months [5-11]. The common acquired EGFR mutations with clinical implications are exon 19 deletions (del19), L858R mutation, and the T790M mutation (Fig. 1) [2]. Cell lines harboring these mutations have been used for screening novel agents targeting these mutations [12]. The EGFR T790M mutation was present in approximately 50 to 60 % of resistant cases [13, 14]. The median survival is less than 2 years after the emergence of T790M mutation [13]. Recently, the third-generation EGFR inhibitors, AZD9291 (osimertinib, mereletinib), CO-1686 (rociletinib), HM61713 (BI 1482694), ASP8273, EGF816, and PF-06747775, have emerged as potential therapeutics to block the growth of EGFR T790M-positive tumors [15-17]. More importantly, unlike the first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs, the third-generation TKIs have a significantly increased potency for EGFR mutants than for wild-type EGFR.
Fig. 1

Common mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that are targets for tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Exons 18 to 21 of EGFR gene are common sites for mutations. The most common mutations that are targets of EGFR TKIs are shown. As an example, three mutation-harboring lung cancer cell lines commonly used to characterize EGFR TKIs are also shown. Del19: exon 19 deletion

Common mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that are targets for tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Exons 18 to 21 of EGFR gene are common sites for mutations. The most common mutations that are targets of EGFR TKIs are shown. As an example, three mutation-harboring lung cancer cell lines commonly used to characterize EGFR TKIs are also shown. Del19: exon 19 deletion

AZD9291 (osimertinib, mereletinib, tagrisso)

AZD9291 is structurally different from the first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs. This compound is an irreversible mutant-selective EGFR TKI (exon 19 deletion EGFR IC50 = 12.92 nM, L858R/T790M EGFR IC50 = 11.44 nM, wild-type EGFR IC50 = 493.8 nM) [15]. It is the only approved EGFR TKI currently indicated for patients with metastatic EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC [18]. A phase I dose escalation study of AZD9291 (AURA) was done in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who had disease progression from the first-generation of EGFR TKI treatment. Patients received doses ranging from 20 to 240 mg/day. These cohorts were not preselected according to T790M status. Five expansion cohorts were stratified according to T790M status (T790M-positive or -negative). Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the escalation cohort and 222 additional patients in the five expansion cohorts. The objective response rate (ORR) was 51 % in the whole population (95 % CI 45–58 %). Among 127 evaluable patients with EGFR T790M mutation, ORR was 67 % (95 % CI 52–70 %). The response rates were similarly high across the five tested dose levels. For patients without EGFR T790M, the ORR was 21 % (95 % CI 12–34 %) [19]. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in EGFR T790M-positive patients (9.6 months; 95 % CI 8.3 to not reached) than that in EGFR T790M-negative patients (2.8 months; 95 % CI 2.1–4.3). The most common adverse effects (AE) were rash, diarrhea, nausea, and poor appetite. There were no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at any dose level. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. At higher dose levels of 160 and 240 mg, an increase in the incidence and severity of adverse events (rash, dry skin, and diarrhea, etc.) was observed. This was thought to be associated with inhibition of non-mutant EGFR. Therefore, 80 mg daily was recommended to be used for further clinical trials [19]. This study also suggested that EGFR T790M is not only a prognostic but also a predictive biomarker. AZD9291 has been examined in the first-line treatment in an expansion cohort from AURA trial, doses of 80 or 160 mg/day were administered to 60 treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC at the time of report [20]. The median age of the patients was 63.5, stable brain metastasis was allowed. EGFR mutation subtypes included EGFR exon 19 deletion (37 %), EGFR exon 21 L858R (40 %), other EGFR sensitizing mutations (3 %), and T790M in 8 % of patients. ORR at the cutoff date was 70 % (95 % CI 57–81). A third of the patients had grade ≥3 adverse events, mainly including skin rash and diarrhea. These results appeared to be promising but clearly preliminary. An ongoing first-line phase III trial is comparing the efficacy and safety of AZD9291 (80 mg/day) in combination with gefitinib or erlotinib in patients with common EGFR mutations. The primary end point is PFS, and the secondary end points include assessment of PFS by pretreatment T790M mutation status and by EGFR mutation subtype (exon 19 deletion or L858R) detected in circulating tumor DNA. Patients were allowed to cross over to AZD9291 after disease progression in the control arm (Table 1).
Table 1

Ongoing clinical trials of osimertinib (AZD9291, TAGRISSO)

PhaseStudy populationNCT no.
Phase IbEGFR mutated advanced NSCLC progressed following therapy with an EGFR TKI02143466
Phase IEGFR mutated advanced NSCLC progressed following therapy with an EGFR TKI and standard therapy02157883
Phase IEGFR mutated advanced NSCLC progressed following therapy with an EGFR TKI02317016
Phase III (ADAURA)EGFR mutated stage IB–IIIA NSCLC following complete resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy02511106
Phase IEGFR mutated advanced NSCLC progressed following therapy with an EGFR TKI02197234
Phase IIIEGFR mutated advanced NSCLC02296125
Phase IIIEGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC progressed following therapy with an EGFR TKI02474355
Phase IIIEGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC progressed following therapy with an EGFR TKI02151981
Phase IEGFR mutated advanced NSCLC progressed following therapy with an EGFR TKI02503722
Phase IEGFR mutated advanced NSCLC progressed following therapy with an EGFR TKI02496663
Phase I/IIEGFR mutated advanced NSCLC progressed following therapy with an EGFR TKI01802632
Phase IEGFR mutated advanced NSCLC02228369
Phase IIEGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC progressed following therapy with an EGFR TKI02094261
Phase IIEGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC progressed following therapy with an EGFR TKI02442349
Phase IbEGFR mutated advanced NSCLC progressed following therapy with an EGFR TKI02520778
Phase IIaStage IIIB–IV locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC02179671
Phase IChinese patients with EGFR mutated advanced NSCLC progressed following therapy with an EGFR TKI02529995
Phase IIEGFR mutated advanced NSCLC progressed following therapy with an EGFR TKI02504346

EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor, NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer, TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Ongoing clinical trials of osimertinib (AZD9291, TAGRISSO) EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor, NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer, TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor Using EGFR mutant cell lines, investigators discovered additional resistance mechanisms, such as NRAS and KRAS mutations and overexpression. A combination of AZD9291 with the MEK inhibitor, selumetinib, was shown to cause regression of AZD9291-resistant tumors in an EGFRm/T790M transgenic model [21]. Multiple ongoing trials of AZD9291 in combination with other novel agents are listed in Table 1. These agents include selumetinib (MEK inhibitor), necitumumab (EGFR antibody), navitoclax (inhibitor of Bcl-xL, Bcl-2, and Bcl-w) [22], and AZD6094 (MET inhibitor).

Rociletinib (CO-1686)

Rociletinib is another novel, oral, irreversible mutant-selective inhibitor of commonly mutated forms of EGFR (exon 19 deletion, L858R, and T790M). Preclinical studies have shown that rociletinib has minimal activity against wild-type EGFR [16]. In xenograft and transgenic models of NSCLC with EGFR mutations including T790M, rociletinib resulted in durable tumor shrinkage [16]. A phase I/II study of rociletinib was done in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC with acquired resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR inhibitors [23]. In the phase II part of the study, patients with NSCLC positive for EGFR T790M received rociletinib at doses of 500, 625, or 750 mg twice daily. At the time of report, 130 patients were enrolled. MTD was not identified. One common DLT was hyperglycemia. Among the 46 patients with T790M-positive disease who could be evaluated, the ORR was 59 % (95 % CI 45 to 73). For the 17 patients with T790M-negative disease, the ORR was 29 % (95 % CI 8 to 51). Therefore, rociletinib was active in NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation. The confirmatory phase II trial of second-line rociletinib (625 mg twice a day) for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC that progressed after previous EGFR TKI therapy is ongoing (TIGER-2; NCT02147990). A randomized phase II study of first-line rociletinib versus erlotinib monotherapy for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC already started recruiting. The phase III trial, TIGER-3, is another open-label, multicenter, randomized study of rociletinib monotherapy versus single-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy in NSCLC patients with mutant EGFR after failure of at least one previous EGFR TKI and platinum-doublet chemotherapy. The ongoing trials of rociletinib are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2

Ongoing clinical trials of rociletinib (CO-1686)

PhaseStudy populationNCT no.
Phase I/IIEGFR mutated advanced NSCLC02580708
Phase I/IIEGFR mutated advanced NSCLC02630186
Phase II/III (TIGER-1)Untreated EGFR mutated advanced NSCLC02186301
Phase II (TIGER-2)EGFR mutated NSCLC02147990
Phase III (TIGER-3)EGFR mutated advanced NSCLC after failure of ≥1 previous EGFR TKI and platinum-doublet chemotherapy02322281

EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor, NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer, TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Ongoing clinical trials of rociletinib (CO-1686) EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor, NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer, TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor

HM61713 (BI 1482694)

HM61713 is an irreversible kinase inhibitor and covalently binds to a cysteine residue near the kinase domain of mutant EGFR. HM61713 has a half-life of over 24 h for EGFR inhibition [24]. HM61713 caused potent inhibition in cell lines H1975 (L858R and T790M) and HCC827 (exon 19 deletion) (Fig. 1). HM61713 has a low potency for NSCLC cell line H358 harboring wild-type EGFR (GI50 of 2225 nM). In the in vivo studies of xenograft models with grafts of H1975 and HCC827, HM61713 was active against the tumors without showing any side effects [24]. In the ongoing phase I/II study of HM61713 in patients with advanced NSCLC who had failed previous EGFR TKIs (NCT01588145), EGFR mutation-positive patients received doses ranging from 75 to 1200 mg/day [17]. In the phase II expansion part of the study, 800 mg QD was the dose given to patients with centrally confirmed T790M-positive NSCLC. In the latest update, 173 patients were enrolled, including 55 in the phase I and 118 in the phase II cohorts. Eight hundred milligrams once daily was the MTD. DLTs mainly involved GI symptoms and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, amylase, and lipase. The ORR was 58.8 % in the 34 patients who received HM61713 with a dose more than 650 mg. In addition, ten patients had unconfirmed partial responses, and 13 achieved disease stabilization [17]. Therefore, HM61713 represents another promising agent for patients with T790M-positive NSCLC.

ASP8273

ASP8273 is another small molecule, irreversible TKI inhibitor that inhibits the kinase activity of EGFR mutations including T790M, with limited activity against EGFR wild-type (WT) NSCLC. In the in vitro enzymatic and cell-based assays, ASP8273 were evaluated against EGFR mutants (L858R, exon 19 deletion, L858R/T790M, and del19/T790M) and WT EGFR [25]. ASP8273 was found by mass spectrometry to covalently bind to a mutant EGFR (L858R/T790M) via cysteine residue 797 in the kinase domain of EGFR with long-lasting inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation for 24 h. In the NSCLC cell lines harboring the above EGFR mutations, ASP8273 had IC50 values of 8–33 nM toward EGFR mutants, more potently than that of WT EGFR (IC50 value of 230 nM). In mouse xenograft models, ASP8273 induced complete regression of the tumors after 14 days of treatment [25]. ASP8273 was further shown to suppress the signaling pathway through ERK and Akt. ASP8273 even showed activity in mutant EGFR cell line which is resistant to other EGFR TKIs including AZD9291 and CO-1686 [26]. Therefore, ASP8273 represents a unique agent active in NSCLC with EGFR T790M mutation. ASP8273 was evaluated in an open-label phase I/II study for safety and efficacy [27]. As of late 2014, 30 Japanese patients were enrolled in the phase I cohorts across seven dose levels (25–600 mg), and 15 patients were enrolled in the expansion cohorts across four dose levels (100–400 mg). EGFR T790M mutation was positive in 49 %. There were 13 % negative for T790M and 38 % unknown. The most common AEs were GI toxicity and thrombocytopenia (31 %). DLTs were reported at higher dose levels (400–600 mg). MTD was established as 400 mg. PR was achieved in 50 % (18/36) of all evaluable patients and 80 % (12/15) in those with T790M. From this study, 300 mg once daily was chosen as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) [27]. In a separate report of a phase I/II study with cutoff date of January 2015, 24 patients were enrolled across six dose escalation cohorts (25–400 mg once daily) and 11 patients were enrolled in two expansion cohorts (100–200 mg once daily) [28]. All patients had failed prior erlotinib treatment. The most common treatment-related AEs were mild gastrointestinal toxicities. DLTs included hyponatremia and anorexia (one case each). The ORR among the evaluable patients was 28 % (7/25) at the cutoff date. In patients with T790M mutation, the ORR was 25 % (3/12). The MTD was anticipated to be 400 mg and the RP2D to be 300 mg. More ongoing studies are listed in Table 3.
Table 3

Ongoing clinical trials of ASP8273

PhaseStudy populationNCT no.
Phase INSCLC patients who have EGFR mutations and received prior treatment with EGFR TKI02113813
Phase I/IINSCLC with EGFR mutation and had progressive disease after previous treatment with EGFR TKIs02192697
Phase IINSCLC with EGFR mutation and TKI naïve patients02500927
Phase IIIStage IIIB/IV NSCLC with EGFR mutations02588261

EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor, NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer, TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Ongoing clinical trials of ASP8273 EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor, NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer, TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor

EGF816

EGF816 is another third-generation covalent EGFR inhibitor that has potent inhibitory activity against activating (L858R, del19) and resistant T790M mutants with low IC50 in various cellular assays [12]. In mouse xenograft models, EGF816 was better than earlier generation EGFR inhibitors. EGF816 target profiles suggest that it represents an alternative and better therapy option against T790M mutations [12, 29–31]. A phase I multicenter, dose escalation study of EGF816 enrolled NSCLC patients with confirmed T790M status. The starting dose was 75 mg daily. The doses were escalated according to an adaptive Bayesian logistic regression model. At the cutoff date of 26 January 2015, 57 patients were treated across six cohorts (75, 150, 225, 300, and 350 mg for capsules; 225 mg for tablets). Diarrhea, stomatitis, rash, and pruritus were the most common AEs. ORR was 54.5 % in 22 evaluable patients. The ongoing study is to determine the MTD and RP2D [32]. More ongoing studies are listed in Table 4.
Table 4

Ongoing clinical trials of EGF816

PhaseStudy populationNCT no.
Phase I/IIPatients with EGFR mutated solid malignancies02108964
Phase Ib/IIPatients with EGFR mutated NSCLC02335944
Phase IIPatients with EGFR mutated and cMET-positive NSCLC02323126

EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor, NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer, TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Ongoing clinical trials of EGF816 EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor, NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer, TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor

PF-06747775

PF-06747775 is another small molecule inhibitor of EGFR T790M. This molecule is being studied in phase I/II clinical trial (NCT02349633) in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations (del 19 or L858R ± T790M). The agent will be administered as continuous daily dosing in 21-day cycles. The starting dose of PF-06747775 will be 25 mg PO daily.

Resistance to third-generation EGFR inhibitors

New mutations are emerging that mediate resistance to third-generation EGFR TKIs [33-37]. Among these, C797S mutation was found to be the most common mechanism responsible for resistance to AZD9291 [33, 35, 36]. C797S was also reported in one case that led to resistance to HM61713 [34]. The C797S mutation was reported to arise after approximately 6–17 months of treatment in patients with T790M mutations [33-36]. Additional mutations and mechanisms of resistance to EGFR TKIs clearly exist since resistance to AZD9291 was reported in patients who became negative for T790M mutation and had no C797S mutation [35].

Conclusions

Clinical trials are being done on the third-generation EGFR TKIs, osimertinib, rociletinib, HM61713, ASP8273, EGF816, and PF-06747775 that are effective for T790M EGFR mutants. Osimertinib (AZD9291, TAGRISSO) was recently approved by FDA for metastatic EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC. The other five inhibitors are still in clinical development. Novel agents are needed to conquer the C797S tertiary EGFR mutation. Since ALK inhibitors and immune check point blockers are also widely used for treatment of NSCLC [8, 38–46], combination and sequential therapies with these agents may improve outcome in patients with advanced NSCLC.
  35 in total

1.  Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Rafael Rosell; Enric Carcereny; Radj Gervais; Alain Vergnenegre; Bartomeu Massuti; Enriqueta Felip; Ramon Palmero; Ramon Garcia-Gomez; Cinta Pallares; Jose Miguel Sanchez; Rut Porta; Manuel Cobo; Pilar Garrido; Flavia Longo; Teresa Moran; Amelia Insa; Filippo De Marinis; Romain Corre; Isabel Bover; Alfonso Illiano; Eric Dansin; Javier de Castro; Michele Milella; Noemi Reguart; Giuseppe Altavilla; Ulpiano Jimenez; Mariano Provencio; Miguel Angel Moreno; Josefa Terrasa; Jose Muñoz-Langa; Javier Valdivia; Dolores Isla; Manuel Domine; Olivier Molinier; Julien Mazieres; Nathalie Baize; Rosario Garcia-Campelo; Gilles Robinet; Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu; Guillermo Lopez-Vivanco; Vittorio Gebbia; Lioba Ferrera-Delgado; Pierre Bombaron; Reyes Bernabe; Alessandra Bearz; Angel Artal; Enrico Cortesi; Christian Rolfo; Maria Sanchez-Ronco; Ana Drozdowskyj; Cristina Queralt; Itziar de Aguirre; Jose Luis Ramirez; Jose Javier Sanchez; Miguel Angel Molina; Miquel Taron; Luis Paz-Ares
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Rociletinib in EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Lecia V Sequist; Jean-Charles Soria; Jonathan W Goldman; Heather A Wakelee; Shirish M Gadgeel; Andrea Varga; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Benjamin J Solomon; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Rafal Dziadziuszko; Dara L Aisner; Robert C Doebele; Cathy Galasso; Edward B Garon; Rebecca S Heist; Jennifer Logan; Joel W Neal; Melody A Mendenhall; Suzanne Nichols; Zofia Piotrowska; Antoinette J Wozniak; Mitch Raponi; Chris A Karlovich; Sarah Jaw-Tsai; Jeffrey Isaacson; Darrin Despain; Shannon L Matheny; Lindsey Rolfe; Andrew R Allen; D Ross Camidge
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Randomized phase II study of erlotinib plus tivantinib versus erlotinib plus placebo in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Lecia V Sequist; Joachim von Pawel; Edward G Garmey; Wallace L Akerley; Wolfram Brugger; Dora Ferrari; Yinpu Chen; Daniel B Costa; David E Gerber; Sergey Orlov; Rodryg Ramlau; Susan Arthur; Igor Gorbachevsky; Brian Schwartz; Joan H Schiller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer with erlotinib or gefitinib.

Authors:  Vince D Cataldo; Don L Gibbons; Román Pérez-Soler; Alfonso Quintás-Cardama
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Analysis of tumor specimens at the time of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI therapy in 155 patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers.

Authors:  Helena A Yu; Maria E Arcila; Natasha Rekhtman; Camelia S Sima; Maureen F Zakowski; William Pao; Mark G Kris; Vincent A Miller; Marc Ladanyi; Gregory J Riely
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations.

Authors:  Lecia V Sequist; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Kenneth O'Byrne; Vera Hirsh; Tony Mok; Sarayut Lucien Geater; Sergey Orlov; Chun-Ming Tsai; Michael Boyer; Wu-Chou Su; Jaafar Bennouna; Terufumi Kato; Vera Gorbunova; Ki Hyeong Lee; Riyaz Shah; Dan Massey; Victoria Zazulina; Mehdi Shahidi; Martin Schuler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Borghaei; Luis Paz-Ares; Leora Horn; David R Spigel; Martin Steins; Neal E Ready; Laura Q Chow; Everett E Vokes; Enriqueta Felip; Esther Holgado; Fabrice Barlesi; Martin Kohlhäufl; Oscar Arrieta; Marco Angelo Burgio; Jérôme Fayette; Hervé Lena; Elena Poddubskaya; David E Gerber; Scott N Gettinger; Charles M Rudin; Naiyer Rizvi; Lucio Crinò; George R Blumenschein; Scott J Antonia; Cécile Dorange; Christopher T Harbison; Friedrich Graf Finckenstein; Julie R Brahmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Discovery of a mutant-selective covalent inhibitor of EGFR that overcomes T790M-mediated resistance in NSCLC.

Authors:  Annette O Walter; Robert Tjin Tham Sjin; Henry J Haringsma; Kadoaki Ohashi; Jing Sun; Kwangho Lee; Aleksandr Dubrovskiy; Matthew Labenski; Zhendong Zhu; Zhigang Wang; Michael Sheets; Thia St Martin; Russell Karp; Dan van Kalken; Prasoon Chaturvedi; Deqiang Niu; Mariana Nacht; Russell C Petter; William Westlin; Kevin Lin; Sarah Jaw-Tsai; Mitch Raponi; Terry Van Dyke; Jeff Etter; Zoe Weaver; William Pao; Juswinder Singh; Andrew D Simmons; Thomas C Harding; Andrew Allen
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 39.397

9.  Phase II study of biomarker-guided neoadjuvant treatment strategy for IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer based on epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status.

Authors:  Wenzhao Zhong; Xuening Yang; Honghong Yan; Xuchao Zhang; Jian Su; Zhihong Chen; Riqiang Liao; Qiang Nie; Song Dong; Qing Zhou; Jinji Yang; Haiyan Tu; Yi-Long Wu
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 10.  Non-invasive approaches to monitor EGFR-TKI treatment in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Wei Sun; Xun Yuan; Yijun Tian; Hua Wu; Hanxiao Xu; Guoqing Hu; Kongming Wu
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 17.388

View more
  103 in total

1.  Selective Covalent Targeting of Mutated EGFR(T790M) with Chlorofluoroacetamide-Pyrimidines.

Authors:  Mami Sato; Hirokazu Fuchida; Naoya Shindo; Keiko Kuwata; Keisuke Tokunaga; Guo Xiao-Lin; Ryo Inamori; Keitaro Hosokawa; Kosuke Watari; Tomohiro Shibata; Naoya Matsunaga; Satoru Koyanagi; Shigehiro Ohdo; Mayumi Ono; Akio Ojida
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  PSCA and MUC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer as targets of chimeric antigen receptor T cells.

Authors:  Xinru Wei; Yunxin Lai; Jin Li; Le Qin; Youdi Xu; Ruocong Zhao; Baiheng Li; Simiao Lin; Suna Wang; Qiting Wu; Qiubin Liang; Muyun Peng; Fenglei Yu; Yangqiu Li; Xuchao Zhang; Yilong Wu; Pentao Liu; Duanqing Pei; Yao Yao; Peng Li
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 3.  Covalent Inhibition in Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Avick Kumar Ghosh; Indranil Samanta; Anushree Mondal; Wenshe Ray Liu
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Bio-Inspired NanoVilli Chips for Enhanced Capture of Tumor-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Toward Non-Invasive Detection of Gene Alterations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Jiantong Dong; Ryan Y Zhang; Na Sun; Matthew Smalley; Zipeng Wu; Anqi Zhou; Shih-Jie Chou; Yu Jen Jan; Peng Yang; Lirong Bao; Dongping Qi; Xinghong Tang; Patrick Tseng; Yue Hua; Dianwen Xu; Rueihung Kao; Meng Meng; Xirun Zheng; Ying Liu; Tatyana Vagner; Xiaoshu Chai; Dongjing Zhou; Mengyuan Li; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Guangjuan Zheng; Dolores Di Vizio; Vatche G Agopian; Edwin Posadas; Steven J Jonas; Shin-Pon Ju; Paul S Weiss; Meiping Zhao; Hsian-Rong Tseng; Yazhen Zhu
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 9.229

5.  Repeat biopsy of patients with acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs: implications of biopsy-related factors on T790M mutation detection.

Authors:  Hyungjin Kim; Kum Ju Chae; Soon Ho Yoon; Miso Kim; Bhumsuk Keam; Tae Min Kim; Dong-Wan Kim; Jin Mo Goo; Chang Min Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Comparison of the effectiveness of erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in patients with common and rare EGFR gene mutations.

Authors:  Pawel Krawczyk; Dariusz M Kowalski; Rodryg Ramlau; Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha; Kinga Winiarczyk; Katarzyna Stencel; Tomasz Powrózek; Katarzyna Reszka; Kamila Wojas-Krawczyk; Maciej Bryl; Magdalena Wójcik-Superczyńska; Maciej Głogowski; Aleksander Barinow-Wojewódzki; Janusz Milanowski; Maciej Krzakowski
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Ursolic acid promotes apoptosis and mediates transcriptional suppression of CT45A2 gene expression in non-small-cell lung carcinoma harbouring EGFR T790M mutations.

Authors:  Kaiyong Yang; Yan Chen; Jiaqian Zhou; Lin Ma; Yating Shan; Xiaoying Cheng; Yun Wang; Zhaoxin Zhang; Xiaojun Ji; Lili Chen; Hui Dai; Biqing Zhu; Chen Li; Zhonghua Tao; Xichun Hu; Wu Yin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Venetoclax and low-dose cytarabine induced complete remission in a patient with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: a case report.

Authors:  Bingshan Liu; Roshni Narurkar; Madhura Hanmantgad; Wahib Zafar; Yongping Song; Delong Liu
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  Ultraspecific and Amplification-Free Quantification of Mutant DNA by Single-Molecule Kinetic Fingerprinting.

Authors:  Stephen L Hayward; Paul E Lund; Qing Kang; Alexander Johnson-Buck; Muneesh Tewari; Nils G Walter
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 10.  Biomaterials and Culture Systems for Development of Organoid and Organ-on-a-Chip Models.

Authors:  Katya D'Costa; Milena Kosic; Angus Lam; Azeen Moradipour; Yimu Zhao; Milica Radisic
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.