Literature DB >> 27071391

The John Charnley Award: Redefining the Natural History of Osteoarthritis in Patients With Hip Dysplasia and Impingement.

Cody C Wyles1, Mark J Heidenreich2, Jack Jeng3, Dirk R Larson4, Robert T Trousdale2, Rafael J Sierra5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Structural hip deformities including developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) are thought to predispose patients to degenerative joint changes. However, the natural history of these malformations is not clearly delineated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Among patients undergoing unilateral THA who have a contralateral hip without any radiographic evidence of hip disease, what is the natural history and progression of osteoarthritis in the native hip based on morphological characteristics? (2) Among patients undergoing unilateral THA who have a contralateral hip without any radiographic evidence of hip disease, what are the radiographic parameters that predict differential rates of degenerative change?
METHODS: We identified every patient 55 years of age or younger at our institution who received unilateral primary THA from 1980 to 1989 (n = 722 patients). Preoperative radiographs were reviewed on the contralateral hip and only hips with Tönnis Grade 0 degenerative change that had minimum 10-year radiographic followup were included. A total of 172 patients met all eligibility criteria with the following structural diagnoses: 48 DDH, 74 FAI, and 40 normal morphology, and an additional 6% (10 of the 172 patients) met all eligibility criteria but were lost to followup before the 10-year minimum. Mean age at the time of study inclusion was 47 years (range, 18-55 years), and 56% (91 of 162) of the patients in this study were female. Mean followup was 20 years (range, 10-35 years). Radiographic metrics, in conjunction with the review of two experienced arthroplasty surgeons, determined the structural hip diagnosis as DDH, FAI, or normal morphology. Every available followup AP radiograph was reviewed to determine progression from Tönnis Grade 0 to 3 until the time of last followup or operative intervention with THA. Survivorship was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology, hazard ratios, and multistate modeling. Thirty-five patients eventually underwent THA: 16 (33%) DDH, 13 (18%) FAI, and six (15%) normal morphology.
RESULTS: Degenerative change was most rapid in patients with DDH followed by FAI and normal morphology. Among patients who recently developed Tönnis 1 degenerative change, the probability of undergoing THA in 10 years based on hip morphology was approximately one in three for DDH and one in five for both FAI and normal morphology hips, whereas the approximate probability at 20 years was two in three for DDH and one in two for both FAI and normal morphology hips. The likelihood of radiographic degeneration was increased in patients with the following findings: femoral head lateralization > 8 mm, femoral head extrusion index > 0.20, acetabular depth-to-width index < 0.30, lateral center-edge angle < 25°, and Tönnis angle > 8°.
CONCLUSIONS: Degenerative change occurred earliest in patients with DDH, whereas the natural history of patients with FAI was quite similar to structurally normal hips. However, patients with cam deformities and concomitant acetabular dysplasia developed osteoarthritis more rapidly. Although the results of this study cannot be directly correlated to highly active patients with FAI, these findings suggest that correction of FAI to a normal morphology may only minimally impact the natural history, especially if intervention takes place beyond Tönnis 0. Analysis of radiographic parameters showed that incremental changes toward dysplastic morphology increase the risk of degenerative change. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27071391      PMCID: PMC5213917          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4815-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  21 in total

Review 1.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement: a radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up.

Authors:  N V Bardakos; R N Villar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-02

3.  A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Paul E Beaulé; Young-Jo Kim; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra; Michael Leunig; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael B Millis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The effects of impingement and dysplasia on stress distributions in the hip joint during sitting and walking: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Salman Chegini; Martin Beck; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  The prevalence of dysplasia in femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Christos P Paliobeis; Richard N Villar
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Markus S Hanke; Guoyan Zheng; Simon D Steppacher; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Hip disease in the young, active patient: evaluation and nonarthroplasty surgical options.

Authors:  Rafael J Sierra; Robert T Trousdale; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Prevalence of associated deformities and hip pain in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  D Allen; P E Beaulé; O Ramadan; S Doucette
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-05

9.  The prognosis in untreated dysplasia of the hip. A study of radiographic factors that predict the outcome.

Authors:  S B Murphy; R Ganz; M E Müller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The classic: Treatment of malum coxae senilis, old slipped upper femoral epiphysis, intrapelvic protrusion of the acetabulum, and coxa plana by means of acetabuloplasty. 1936.

Authors:  Marius Nygaard Smith-Petersen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  64 in total

Review 1.  Hip Pain in Children.

Authors:  Ayla Yagdiran; Kourosh Zarghooni; Jörg Oliver Semler; Peer Eysel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  CORR Insights®: A Possible New Radiographic Predictor of Progression of Osteoarthritis in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: The Center Gap.

Authors:  Benjamin F Ricciardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  CORR Insights®: What MRI Findings Predict Failure 10 Years After Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement?

Authors:  Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Incidence of Femoroacetabular Impingement and Surgical Management Trends Over Time.

Authors:  Rena F Hale; Heath P Melugin; Jun Zhou; Matthew D LaPrade; Christopher Bernard; Devin Leland; Bruce A Levy; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Risk Factors for Long-term Hip Osteoarthritis in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Without Surgical Intervention.

Authors:  Heath P Melugin; Rena F Hale; Jun Zhou; Matthew LaPrade; Christopher Bernard; Devin Leland; Bruce A Levy; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Dysplastic hip anatomy alters muscle moment arm lengths, lines of action, and contributions to joint reaction forces during gait.

Authors:  Ke Song; Brecca M M Gaffney; Kevin B Shelburne; Cecilia Pascual-Garrido; John C Clohisy; Michael D Harris
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  [Periacetabular osteotomy-what influence does age have on patient-relevant results? : A prospective 5‑year investigation].

Authors:  L Franken; F Thielemann; A Postler; S Blum; A Hartmann; K-P Günther; J Goronzy
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  A Possible New Radiographic Predictor of Progression of Osteoarthritis in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: The Center Gap.

Authors:  Daigo Morita; Yukiharu Hasegawa; Taisuke Seki; Takafumi Amano; Yasuhiko Takegami; Takehiro Kasai; Yoshitoshi Higuchi; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Rapidly Progressive Arthritis in Femoroacetabular Impingement: Patient Characteristics and Risk Factors for Total Hip Arthroplasty by the Age of Forty.

Authors:  Kevin A Schafer; John C Clohisy; Jeffrey J Nepple
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

Review 10.  Hip dysplasia in the young adult caused by residual childhood and adolescent-onset dysplasia.

Authors:  Stephanie Pun
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.