Literature DB >> 27071092

Striatal structure and function predict individual biases in learning to avoid pain.

Eran Eldar1, Tobias U Hauser2, Peter Dayan3, Raymond J Dolan2.   

Abstract

Pain is an elemental inducer of avoidance. Here, we demonstrate that people differ in how they learn to avoid pain, with some individuals refraining from actions that resulted in painful outcomes, whereas others favor actions that helped prevent pain. These individual biases were best explained by differences in learning from outcome prediction errors and were associated with distinct forms of striatal responses to painful outcomes. Specifically, striatal responses to pain were modulated in a manner consistent with an aversive prediction error in individuals who learned predominantly from pain, whereas in individuals who learned predominantly from success in preventing pain, modulation was consistent with an appetitive prediction error. In contrast, striatal responses to success in preventing pain were consistent with an appetitive prediction error in both groups. Furthermore, variation in striatal structure, encompassing the region where pain prediction errors were expressed, predicted participants' predominant mode of learning, suggesting the observed learning biases may reflect stable individual traits. These results reveal functional and structural neural components underlying individual differences in avoidance learning, which may be important contributors to psychiatric disorders involving pathological harm avoidance behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  avoidance learning; individual differences; pain; prediction errors; striatum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27071092      PMCID: PMC4855606          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1519829113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  48 in total

Review 1.  Voxel-based morphometry--the methods.

Authors:  J Ashburner; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Temporal difference models describe higher-order learning in humans.

Authors:  Ben Seymour; John P O'Doherty; Peter Dayan; Martin Koltzenburg; Anthony K Jones; Raymond J Dolan; Karl J Friston; Richard S Frackowiak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning.

Authors:  R G Phillips; J E LeDoux
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Active avoidance requires a serial basal amygdala to nucleus accumbens shell circuit.

Authors:  Franchesca Ramirez; Justin M Moscarello; Joseph E LeDoux; Robert M Sears
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Connectivity strength of dissociable striatal tracts predict individual differences in temporal discounting.

Authors:  Wouter van den Bos; Christian A Rodriguez; Julie B Schweitzer; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Effects of amygdala, hippocampus, and periaqueductal gray lesions on short- and long-term contextual fear.

Authors:  J J Kim; R A Rison; M S Fanselow
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Taking action in the face of threat: neural synchronization predicts adaptive coping.

Authors:  Katherine A Collins; Avi Mendelsohn; Christopher K Cain; Daniela Schiller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  White-Matter Tract Connecting Anterior Insula to Nucleus Accumbens Correlates with Reduced Preference for Positively Skewed Gambles.

Authors:  Josiah K Leong; Franco Pestilli; Charlene C Wu; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Active vs. reactive threat responding is associated with differential c-Fos expression in specific regions of amygdala and prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Raquel C R Martinez; Nikita Gupta; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; Robert M Sears; Soojeong Kim; Justin M Moscarello; Joseph E LeDoux; Christopher K Cain
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Representation of aversive prediction errors in the human periaqueductal gray.

Authors:  Mathieu Roy; Daphna Shohamy; Nathaniel Daw; Marieke Jepma; G Elliott Wimmer; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  23 in total

1.  Active Avoidance: Neural Mechanisms and Attenuation of Pavlovian Conditioned Responding.

Authors:  Emily A Boeke; Justin M Moscarello; Joseph E LeDoux; Elizabeth A Phelps; Catherine A Hartley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Separate mesocortical and mesolimbic pathways encode effort and reward learning signals.

Authors:  Tobias U Hauser; Eran Eldar; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Impaired adaptation of learning to contingency volatility in internalizing psychopathology.

Authors:  Christopher Gagne; Ondrej Zika; Peter Dayan; Sonia J Bishop
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Different brain systems support learning from received and avoided pain during human pain-avoidance learning.

Authors:  Marieke Jepma; Mathieu Roy; Kiran Ramlakhan; Monique van Velzen; Albert Dahan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 5.  Linking interindividual variability in brain structure to behaviour.

Authors:  Sarah Genon; Simon B Eickhoff; Shahrzad Kharabian
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 38.755

6.  When Implicit Prosociality Trumps Selfishness: The Neural Valuation System Underpins More Optimal Choices When Learning to Avoid Harm to Others Than to Oneself.

Authors:  Lukas L Lengersdorff; Isabella C Wagner; Patricia L Lockwood; Claus Lamm
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Driven by Pain, Not Gain: Computational Approaches to Aversion-Related Decision Making in Psychiatry.

Authors:  Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Model-free decision making is prioritized when learning to avoid harming others.

Authors:  Patricia L Lockwood; Miriam C Klein-Flügge; Ayat Abdurahman; Molly J Crockett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Modeling Avoidance in Mood and Anxiety Disorders Using Reinforcement Learning.

Authors:  Anahit Mkrtchian; Jessica Aylward; Peter Dayan; Jonathan P Roiser; Oliver J Robinson
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 10.  How Accurate Appraisal of Behavioral Costs and Benefits Guides Adaptive Pain Coping.

Authors:  Wiebke Gandhi; India Morrison; Petra Schweinhardt
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.