Literature DB >> 27070951

Supine Versus Standing Radiographs for Detecting Ischiofemoral Impingement: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Sunghoon Park1,2, Hyun Young Lee3,4, Pham Manh Cuong5, Ye-Yeon Won6, Hyung-Min Ji6, Seung-Hyun Yoon7, Kyu-Sung Kwack1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess parameters of ischiofemoral impingement on supine and standing anteroposterior hip radiographs and to suggest optimal cutoff points for detection of ischiofemoral impingement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study included patients with a clinical history of hip pain. All hip joints with evidence of quadratus femoris muscle edema on MR images were included in the ischiofemoral impingement patient group. An age- and sex-matched control group was derived from the same cohort by propensity score matching. On radiographs, two readers independently measured the following parameters: ischiofemoral space, quadratus femoris space, hamstring tendon area, ischiofemoral distance on supine radiograph, ischiofemoral distance on standing radiograph, and femoral neck-shaft angle. Group differences in parameters were assessed by Mann-Whitney U test. The intraclass correlation coefficient and the ROC AUC were obtained. Correlations between radiographic and MRI measures were assessed with Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plot analyses. The Youden J index was used to select optimum cutoff points for each parameter.
RESULTS: There were 30 patients (44 hip joints; mean age, 54.8 ± 11 years) in the ischiofemoral impingement group and 88 patients (88 hip joints; mean age, 51.8 ± 13.4 years) in the control group. There were significant group differences in ischiofemoral space, quadratus femoris space, ischiofemoral distance on supine radiograph, ischiofemoral distance on standing radiograph, and neck-shaft angle (p < 0.05). Ischiofemoral distance on supine and standing radiographs exhibited good discriminative ability (AUC > 0.80). The optimal cutoff points for ischiofemoral distances on supine and standing radiographs were 19.9 and 19.1 mm for reader 1 and 21.1 and 17.0 mm for reader 2. Ischiofemoral space, quadratus femoris space, ischiofemoral distance on supine radiograph, and ischiofemoral distance on standing radiograph exhibited nearly perfect interobserver agreement (r > 0.8).
CONCLUSION: Ischiofemoral distances on supine and standing hip radiographs had good diagnostic performance and can be used as a screening tool, with optimal cutoff points.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; hip; ischiofemoral impingement; propensity score; radiograph

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27070951     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.15186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

1.  Correlations between intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging parameters and 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in patients with vertebral bone metastases: initial experience.

Authors:  Sunghoon Park; Joon-Kee Yoon; Nam-Su Chung; Sang Hyun Kim; Jinwoo Hwang; Hyun Young Lee; Kyu-Sung Kwack
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  In Vivo Measurements of the Ischiofemoral Space in Recreationally Active Participants During Dynamic Activities: A High-Speed Dual Fluoroscopy Study.

Authors:  Penny R Atkins; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters; Travis G Maak; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  What Factors Are Associated With Postoperative Ischiofemoral Impingement After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip?

Authors:  Ying Huang; Zheng Zeng; Liu-Yang Xu; Yang Li; Jian-Ping Peng; Chao Shen; Guoyan Zheng; Xiao-Dong Chen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Clinics in diagnostic imaging (197). Left ischiofemoral impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Genevieve Jingwen Tan; Niketa Chotai; Ankit Tandon
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 5.  How to address ischiofemoral impingement? Treatment algorithm and review of the literature.

Authors:  Hans Gollwitzer; Ingo J Banke; Johannes Schauwecker; Ludger Gerdesmeyer; Christian Suren
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2017-08-31

6.  Utility of False Profile View for Screening of Ischiofemoral Impingement.

Authors:  Dae-Kyung Kwak; Ick-Hwan Yang; Sungjun Kim; Sang-Chul Lee; Kwan-Kyu Park; Woo-Suk Lee
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2018-12-06

7.  Is there a relationship between femoral neck-shaft angle and ischiofemoral impingement in patients with hip pain?

Authors:  Stephanie S Gardner; David Dong; Leif E Peterson; Kwan J Park; Joshua D Harris
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2020-02-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.