Literature DB >> 27070681

Effects of A Novel Decision Aid for Breast Reconstruction: A Randomized Prospective Trial.

Anna Luan1, Kenneth J Hui, Austin C Remington, Xiangxia Liu, Gordon K Lee.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The choice to undergo mastectomy and breast reconstruction is a highly personal decision with profound psychosocial effects, and ultimately, the decision between implant- and autologous tissue-based reconstruction should be made based on a combination of factual information and the patient's personal values and preferences. Unfortunately, patients undergoing breast reconstruction surgery may experience decision regret. Decision aids promote patient involvement in decision making by not only providing standard information about options, but also emphasizing comparative risks, benefits, and alternatives, and most importantly by providing clarification exercises regarding personal values to guide patients toward an individualized decision.
METHODS: We developed a novel decision aid to provide decision support and structured guidance for prosthetic, autologous, and combined prosthetic-autologous breast reconstruction surgery. New breast reconstruction patients of one surgeon at our institution were randomized by week to either receive the decision aid or standard preconsultation material. Immediately preceding their new patient consultation clinic visit, patients were asked to complete the validated Decisional Conflict Scale and the BREAST-Q Preoperative survey. After 3 to 5 months following breast mound reconstruction, patients were asked to complete the Decision Regret Scale, BREAST-Q Postoperative survey, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
RESULTS: Patients who received the decision aid demonstrated a trend toward decreased preoperative decisional conflict (mean of 13.3 ± 5.5, compared to 26.2 ± 4.2; n = 8 per group, P = 0.069), with similar preoperative BREAST-Q scores. Most patients desired to know "everything" regarding their reconstruction surgery (75%), and to be "very involved" in the decisions in their care (81%), with remaining patients wanting to know "as much as I need to be prepared" and to be "somewhat involved." Postoperatively, patients who received the decision aid demonstrated significantly less decision regret (P < 0.001), although there was no significant difference in anxiety, depression, or quality of life-related outcomes as measured by the BREAST-Q.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of decision aids in breast reconstruction surgery may help decrease decisional conflict and regret through promoting improved information sharing and shared decision making, which are highly important in this particular setting, patient population, and in our move toward greater patient-centered care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27070681     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  9 in total

1.  Validation of the electronic version of the BREAST-Q in the army of women study.

Authors:  Sarah Fuzesi; Stefan J Cano; Anne F Klassen; Dunya Atisha; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 2.  Regret in Surgical Decision Making: A Systematic Review of Patient and Physician Perspectives.

Authors:  Ana Wilson; Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Factors Associated With Decision Regret Among Patients With Diverticulitis in the Elective Setting.

Authors:  Jessica N Cohan; Brian Orleans; Federica S Brecha; Lyen C Huang; Angela Presson; Angela Fagerlin; Elissa M Ozanne
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  The impact of an online patient decision aid for women with breast cancer considering immediate breast reconstruction: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Ter Stege; Leonie A E Woerdeman; Daniela E E Hahn; Martine A van Huizum; Frederieke H van Duijnhoven; Jacobien M Kieffer; Valesca P Retèl; Kerry A Sherman; Arjen J Witkamp; Hester S A Oldenburg; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Challenges and Solutions for the Implementation of Shared Decision-making in Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Terence M Myckatyn; Rajiv P Parikh; Clara Lee; Mary C Politi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-02-06

6.  Long-Term Effectiveness of a Decision Support App (Pink Journey) for Women Considering Breast Reconstruction Surgery: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Su-Ying Fang; Pin-Jun Lin; Yao-Lung Kuo
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.773

7.  Health Literacy in Plastic Surgery: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ekaterina Tiourin; Natalie Barton; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-04-13

8.  Considering Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy: A Patient Decision Aid Video and Workbook.

Authors:  Aubri S Hoffman; Scott B Cantor; Michelle C Fingeret; Ashley J Housten; Summer E Hanson; Jennifer H McGee; Jordan T Pietz; Alina Bennett; Robert J Volk; Gregory P Reece
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-11-20

9.  Can Upstream Patient Education Improve Fracture Care in a Digital World? Use of a Decision Aid for the Treatment of Displaced Diaphyseal Clavicle Fractures.

Authors:  Cara H Lai; Malcolm R DeBaun; Noelle Van Rysselberghe; Geoffrey D Abrams; Robin N Kamal; Julius A Bishop; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.884

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.