| Literature DB >> 27069888 |
Constantino Jorge Calapodopulos1, Marcelo Corvino Nogueira2, José Martins Juliano Eustáquio3, Constantino Jorge Calapodopulos Júnior3, Oreston Alves Rodrigues4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the surgical technique using the quadriceps tendon as a graft in static reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament.Entities:
Keywords: Patellar dislocation; Patellofemoral ligament; Quadriceps tendon
Year: 2016 PMID: 27069888 PMCID: PMC4811995 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.01.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Lysholm questionnaire. Translation validated for the Portuguese language.
| Never = 5 | None = 25 |
| None = 5 | None = 10 |
| No locking or feeling of this = 15 | No problem = 10 |
| Never = 25 | No problem = 5 |
Scoring: excellent: 95–100; good: 84–94; fair: 65–83; poor ≤64.
Fig. 1Surgical incision on the superomedial face of the patella, of approximately 50 mm.
Fig. 2The full thickness of the middle third of the tendon of the quadriceps (length of 10 mm) is sectioned while maintaining the distal insertion in the patella (arrow).
Fig. 3Incision on the medial face of the knee, of approximately 20 mm (arrow).
Fig. 4Transfer of the graft to its fixation point on the distal femur, under the vastus medialis muscle.
Fig. 5* Nomura's point: fixation of the medial patellofemoral ligament in the distal femur (ME = medial epicondyle, AM = insertion of the adductor magnus).
Fig. 6Fixation of the graft in the distal femur, with the aid of an anchor.
Characterization of the study sample, according to sex (M = male, F = female), age, side affected (R = right, L = left), employment-law issues (Y = yes, N = no) and scoring from the Lysholm questionnaire.
| Patient | Sex | Age | Side | Employment-law issues | Limping | Weight-bearing | Locking | Instability | Pain | Swelling | Going up stairs | Squatting | TOTAL SCORE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | 16 | L | N | 5 | 5 | 10 | 25 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 89 |
| 2 | F | 18 | R | N | 3 | 5 | 15 | 25 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 92 |
| 3 | F | 15 | R | N | 5 | 5 | 10 | 20 | 20 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 74 |
| 4 | F | 21 | R | N | 3 | 5 | 15 | 20 | 20 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 83 |
| 5 | M | 21 | L | N | 5 | 5 | 15 | 25 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 95 |
| 6 | F | 20 | L | N | 5 | 5 | 20 | 20 | 25 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 80 |
| 7 | F | 21 | L | N | 5 | 5 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 95 |
| 8 | F | 18 | R | N | 5 | 5 | 10 | 25 | 20 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 82 |
| 9 | F | 19 | L | N | 5 | 5 | 10 | 20 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 84 |
| 10 | F | 39 | L | Y | 5 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 56 |
| 11 | F | 19 | R | N | 5 | 5 | 15 | 25 | 25 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 99 |
| 12 | F | 40 | L | Y | 5 | 5 | 6 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 56 |
| 13 | M | 19 | L | N | 5 | 5 | 10 | 25 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 90 |
| 14 | F | 28 | R | N | 5 | 5 | 15 | 25 | 25 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 100 |
| 15 | F | 18 | L | N | 5 | 5 | 15 | 25 | 25 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 97 |
| 16 | F | 26 | R | N | 3 | 5 | 15 | 25 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 93 |
| 17 | F | 18 | R | N | 5 | 5 | 10 | 25 | 20 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 80 |
| 18 | F | 28 | L | N | 3 | 5 | 15 | 20 | 20 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 83 |
| 19 | F | 48 | L | Y | 5 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 58 |
| 20 | F | 20 | R | N | 5 | 5 | 15 | 25 | 25 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 97 |
| 21 | M | 19 | L | N | 5 | 5 | 15 | 20 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 89 |
| 22 | F | 17 | L | N | 5 | 5 | 10 | 25 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 90 |
Results from patient's scores in the Lysholm questionnaire.
| Lysholm score | Number of patients | % of the patients |
|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 06 | 27.2 |
| Good | 07 | 31.8 |
| Regular | 06 | 27.2 |
| Poor | 03 | 13.8 |