| Literature DB >> 27069885 |
Flávio de Oliveira França1, André Couto Godinho1, Elísio José Salgado Ribeiro1, Lorenzo Falster1, Lucas Emanuel Gava Búrigo1, Rafael Berenstein Nunes1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the relationship between the size, degree of retraction and topography of rotator cuff injuries and the degree of rise of the humeral head, and to evaluate the influence of gravity, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Entities:
Keywords: Acromion; Humerus; Magnetic resonance imaging; Rotator cuff
Year: 2016 PMID: 27069885 PMCID: PMC4812032 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.01.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Fig. 1Apex of the humeral head, seen on a coronal slice (image on left). Measurement of the shortest distance between the apex of the humeral head and the acromion, seen on a sagittal slice (image on right).
Demographics of the injury group.
| Mean age (range) | Mean subacromial space (range) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 88 (100) | 65.19 (36–89) | 6.97 (1.81–13.5) | |
| Superior | 40 (45.45) | 63.47 (36–89) | 7.78 (4.15–11.58) |
| Anterosuperior | 8 (9.09) | 66.25 (51–85) | 8.28 (5.73–13.5) |
| Posterosuperior | 27 (30.68) | 65.03 (51–88) | 6.77 (5.04–9.91) |
| Anteroposterosuperior | 13 (14.77) | 70.15 (55–87) | 4.15 (1.81–10.11) |
Demographics in relation to Patte's classification.
| Mean age (range) | Mean subacromial space (range) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 88 (100) | 65.19 (36–89) | 6.97 (1.81–13.5) | |
| Patte | 29 (32.95) | 62.31 (36–78) | 8.56 (4.22–13.5) |
| Patte | 32 (36.36) | 64.28 (51–89) | 7.23 (4.19–11.73) |
| Patte | 27 (30.68) | 69.37 (51–88) | 5.01 (1.81–10.11) |
Correlation of subacromial space between the control and injury groups.
| Group | Mean subacromial space | SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 93 | 7.71 | 1.58 | 2.418 | 0.017 |
| Injury | 88 | 6.99 | 2.37 |
The probabilities of significance (p-values) refer to Student's t test for independent samples.
Comparison between mean subacromial space measurements in the injury subgroups and in the control group.
| Group | Mean subacromial space | SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93 | 7.71 | 1.57 | |||
| Superior | 40 | 7.8 | 1.75 | −0.298 | 0.766 |
| Anterosuperior | 8 | 8.29 | 2.82 | −0.92 | 0.36 |
| Posterosuperior | 27 | 6.77 | 1.85 | 2.622 | 0.010 |
| Anteroposterosuperior | 13 | 4.16 | 2.57 | 6.97 | 0.000 |
The probabilities of significance (p-values) refer to Student's t test for independent samples.
Comparison between mean subacromial space measurements in the Patte subgroups and in the control group.
| Group | Mean subacromial space | SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93 | 7.71 | 1.58 | |||
| Patte | 29 | 8.57 | 1.91 | −2.425 | 0.017 |
| Patte | 32 | 7.23 | 1.55 | 1.484 | 0.14 |
| Patte | 27 | 5.01 | 2.25 | 7.063 | 0.000 |
The probabilities of significance (p-values) refer to Student's t test for independent samples.
Pair-by-pair comparison of mean subacromial space measurements in relation to the Patte classification.
| Group | Mean subacromial space | SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 | 8.57 | 1.91 | 3.009 | 0.004 | |
| 32 | 7.23 | 1.55 | |||
| 29 | 8.57 | 1.91 | 6.386 | 0.000 | |
| 27 | 5.01 | 2.25 | |||
| 32 | 7.23 | 1.55 | −4.472 | 0.000 | |
| 27 | 5.01 | 2.25 | |||
The probabilities of significance (p-values) refer to Student's t test for independent samples.