| Literature DB >> 27069472 |
Mohammad Afshar1, Reza Ghaderi2, Mahmoud Zardast3, Parvin Delshad3.
Abstract
The goal of this study was to determine the effect of topical Emu oil on the healing of burn wounds and hair follicle restoration in superficial II-degree burns in the skin of Balb/c mice. Thirty-two male Balb/c mice with burns on the back of the neck were divided into two groups: The Emu oil group received topical Emu oil twice daily, whereas the control was left untreated. Skin biopsies were obtained on days 4, 7, 10, and 14 of the experiment. Then the specimens were viewed with Olympus SZX research microscope. The Emu oil treated burns were found to heal more slowly and inflammation lasted longer in this group. The number of hair follicles in the margins of the wounds increased through time in the Emu oil group compared to the control group. Also, the hair follicles in the Emu oil group were in several layers and seemed to be more active and mature. Moreover, Emu oil had a positive effect on fibrogenesis and synthesis of collagen. The findings indicate that although Emu oil delays the healing process, it has a positive effect on wound healing and it increases the number of hair follicles in the margins of the wound.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27069472 PMCID: PMC4812284 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6419216
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dermatol Res Pract ISSN: 1687-6113
Figure 1Photomicrographs of skin in Emu oil (a) and control (b) groups in the 4th day. Inflammatory cell density was higher in the Emu oil treated group in comparison with control group. Marked rectangle. Staining: Hematoxylin-Eosin, magnification: 40x.
Microscopic features of wounds in Emu oil group and control group in different days.
| Day 4 | Day 7 | Day 10 | Day 14 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Control | Case | Control | Case | Control | Case | Control | |
| Inflammatory cell density (cell/HPF) | 145 ± 56 | 98 ± 35 | 91 ± 33 | 72 ± 31 | 67 ± 28 | 29 ± 15 | 21 ± 14 | 12 ± 9 |
|
| ||||||||
| Inflammatory cell type | 100% PMN, no MN | 98% PMN, 2% MN | 93% PMN, 7% MN | 70% PMN, 30% MN | 80% PMN, 20% MN | 5% PMN, 95% MN | 30% PMN, 70% MN | No PMN, 100% MN |
|
| ||||||||
| Granulation tissue formation | — | −/+ | + | ++ | ++ | +/− | +/− | — |
|
| ||||||||
| Edema | ++ | ++ | ++/+ | + | + | +/− | +/− | — |
|
| ||||||||
| Fibroblast density | 3 ± 2/HPF | 5 ± 2/HPF | 9 ± 4/HPF | 13 ± 7/HPF | 23 ± 12/HPF | 18 ± 8/HPF | 22 ± 10/HPF | 20 ± 11/HPF |
|
| ||||||||
| Fibroblast activity | — | — | −/+ | + | ++ | +/++ | ++ | ++ |
|
| ||||||||
| Basal layer | Damaged | Damaged | Marked in margins | Marked in margins | Join completed | Join completed | Completed | Completed |
|
| ||||||||
| Increased thickness of epidermis in the edge of wound | No epidermis in the edge | No epidermis in the edge | 4 ± 1 layers' epidermis | 4 ± 1 layers' epidermis | 2 ± 1 layers' epidermis | 2 ± 1 layers' epidermis | 1 ± 1 layers' epidermis | No epidermis in the edge |
|
| ||||||||
| Keratosis in the edge of wound | 2 ± 1 layers | 2 ± 1.5 layers | 3 ± 1.5 layers | 2 ± 1 layers | 6 ± 2 layers | 2 ± 1 layers | 3 ± 1 layers | 2 ± 1 layers |
|
| ||||||||
| Number of hair follicles in the scar | 12 ± 5 necrotic follicles/LPF | 15 ± 6 necrotic follicles/LPF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| ||||||||
| Number of hair follicles in the margins | 20 ± 2 | 20 ± 2.5 | 22 ± 3 | 18 ± 2.6 | 25 ± 3.4 | 15 ± 1.4 | 28 ± 2.6 | 12 ± 1.4 |
Microscope: Olympus SZX research microscope. LPF (Low Power Field) is 100x and HPF (High Power Field) is 400x. Diameter of objective lens of LPF is 1.02 mm and HPF is 0.51 mm.
Figure 2Photomicrographs of skin in emu oil (a) and control (b) groups in the 7th day. High active fibroblasts and collagen fibers in Emu oil treated group in comparison with the control group. Staining: Trichrome-Mallory, magnification: 400x.
Figure 3Photomicrographs of skin in emu oil (a) and control (b) groups in the 14th day. Thickness measure of epidermis in the margin of the wound and the number of hair follicles on the edge of the wound were higher in the Emu oil treated group in comparison with control group. Staining: Hematoxylin-Eosin, magnification: 40x.