Literature DB >> 27069271

A single cohort prospective trial of the immediate effects of spinal manipulation on visual acuity.

Michelle Athaide1, Carol Rego1, Brian Budgell2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is no high quality evidence on which to judge the generalizability of isolated reports of improvement in vision following manipulation. The current paucity of research results also precludes the thoughtful design of a controlled, prospective clinical study. Hence, the purpose of the current study was to test the feasibility of conducting a clinical trial of the acute effects of spinal manipulation on visual acuity.
METHODS: New adult patients presenting to a community based chiropractic clinic were recruited into a single cohort prospective trial to determine the immediate effects of cervical spinal manipulation on visual acuity.
RESULTS: The experimental protocol was well accepted by patients and caused minimal or no disruption of the clinic routine. By some measures, chiropractic treatment was accompanied by statistically significant improvements in visual acuity. DISCUSSION: The results of this study indicate that it is quite feasible to conduct a prospective, community based clinical study of the acute effects of spinal manipulation on visual acuity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chiropractic; feasibility; pilot study; spinal manipulation; visual acuity

Year:  2016        PMID: 27069271      PMCID: PMC4807672     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc        ISSN: 0008-3194


  13 in total

1.  Monocular scotomata and spinal manipulation: the step phenomenon.

Authors:  R F Gorman
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  The step phenomenon in the recovery of vision with spinal manipulation: a report on two 13-yr-olds treated together.

Authors:  D Stephens; F Gorman; D Bilton
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Bilateral simultaneous optic nerve dysfunction after periorbital trauma: recovery of vision in association with with chiropractic spinal manipulation therapy.

Authors:  D Stephens; H Pollard; D Bilton; P Thomson; F Gorman
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 4.  Bias and small-study effects influence treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study in oral medicine.

Authors:  Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Georgios N Antonoglou; Elli Tsiranidou; Søren Jepsen; Andreas Jäger
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Pilot and feasibility studies: is there a difference from each other and from a randomised controlled trial?

Authors:  Amy L Whitehead; Benjamin G O Sully; Michael J Campbell
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Treatment of severe glaucomatous visual field deficit by chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy: a prospective case study and discussion.

Authors:  B R Wingfield; R F Gorman
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Monocular versus binocular visual acuity as measures of vision impairment and predictors of visual disability.

Authors:  G S Rubin; B Muñoz; K Bandeen-Roche; S K West
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Prospective evaluation of visual acuity assessment: a comparison of snellen versus ETDRS charts in clinical practice (An AOS Thesis).

Authors:  Peter K Kaiser
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2009-12

9.  The treatment of presumptive optic nerve ischemia by spinal manipulation.

Authors:  R F Gorman
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Monocular visual loss after closed head trauma: immediate resolution associated with spinal manipulation.

Authors:  R F Gorman
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.