Literature DB >> 24855929

Bias and small-study effects influence treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study in oral medicine.

Spyridon N Papageorgiou1, Georgios N Antonoglou2, Elli Tsiranidou3, Søren Jepsen4, Andreas Jäger5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the influence of the following study characteristics on their study effect estimates: (1) indexing in MEDLINE, (2) language, and (3) design. For randomized trials, (4) trial size and (5) unequal randomization were also assessed. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: The CAtegorical Dental and Maxillofacial Outcome Syntheses meta-epidemiologic study was conducted. Eight databases/registers were searched up to September 2012 for meta-analyses of binary outcomes with at least five studies in the field of dental and maxillofacial medicine. The previously mentioned five study characteristics were investigated. The ratio of odds ratios (ROR) according to each characteristic was calculated with random-effects meta-regression and then pooled across meta-analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 281 meta-analyses were identified and used to assess the influence of the following factors: non-MEDLINE indexing vs. MEDLINE indexing (n = 78; ROR, 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05, 1.19; P = 0.001), language (n = 61; P = 0.546), design (n = 24; P = 0.576), small trials (<200 patients) vs. large trials (≥200 patients) (n = 80; ROR, 0.92; 95% CI: 0.87, 0.98; P = 0.009) and unequal randomization (n = 36; P = 0.828).
CONCLUSION: Studies indexed in MEDLINE might present greater effects than non-indexed ones. Small randomized trials might present greater effects than large ones.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dentistry; Effect size; Meta-analysis; Meta-epidemiologic study; Systematic review; systematic error

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24855929     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  8 in total

1.  A single cohort prospective trial of the immediate effects of spinal manipulation on visual acuity.

Authors:  Michelle Athaide; Carol Rego; Brian Budgell
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2016-03

Review 2.  Influence of piezotomy and osteoperforation of the alveolar process on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stefan Hoffmann; Nikolaos Papadopoulos; Dominik Visel; Theresa Visel; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; Thomas Michael Präger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 3.  Does vaginal progesterone prevent recurrent preterm birth in women with a singleton gestation and a history of spontaneous preterm birth? Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 10.693

4.  Evidence regarding lingual fixed orthodontic appliances' therapeutic and adverse effects is insufficient.

Authors:  Kelvin I Afrashtehfar
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2016-06

5.  Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  Iosief Abraha; Antonio Cherubini; Francesco Cozzolino; Rita De Florio; Maria Laura Luchetta; Joseph M Rimland; Ilenia Folletti; Mauro Marchesi; Antonella Germani; Massimiliano Orso; Paolo Eusebi; Alessandro Montedori
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-05-27

Review 6.  Noninvasive Ventilation with Heliox for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chen Long; Wang Li; Li Wanwei; Li Jie; Shi Yuan
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.409

7.  Trial-level characteristics associate with treatment effect estimates: a systematic review of meta-epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Huan Wang; Jinlu Song; Yali Lin; Wenjie Dai; Yinyan Gao; Lang Qin; Yancong Chen; Wilson Tam; Irene Xy Wu; Vincent Ch Chung
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.612

8.  Altmetrics Attention Scores for Randomized Controlled Trials in Total Joint Arthroplasty Are Reflective of High Scientific Quality: An Altmetrics-Based Methodological Quality and Bias Analysis.

Authors:  Kyle N Kunze; Michelle Richardson; David N Bernstein; Ajay Premkumar; Nicolas S Piuzzi; Alexander S McLawhorn
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.