Literature DB >> 27068383

An anthropometric analysis to derive formulae for calculating the dimensions of anatomically shaped humeral heads.

C Scott Humphrey1, Benjamin W Sears2, Michael J Curtin3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The elliptical shape of the humeral head has been vaguely described, but a more detailed mathematical description is lacking. The primary goal of this study was to create formulae to describe the mathematical relationships between the various dimensions of anatomically shaped humeral heads.
METHODS: Three-dimensional computer models of 79 proximal humeri derived from computed tomography scans (white subjects, 47 male and 32 female; ages, 17-87 years) were studied. Linear regression analysis of the obtained humeral measurements was performed, and Pearson correlation coefficient (R) values were calculated. To substantiate the results of the linear regression analysis, Welch t-test was used to compare various parameters of small, medium, and large humeral heads.
RESULTS: Formulae for calculating humeral head height, diameters of the base of the humeral head in the frontal and sagittal planes, and radii of curvature in the frontal and sagittal planes were derived from the linear regression plots that were found to have strong (1 ≥ R ≥ 0.50) correlations. By Welch t-test, differences between the 3 head sizes were statistically significant in each case (P ≤ .022). The elliptical shape of the base of the humeral head was found to elongate with increasing humeral head size.
CONCLUSIONS: Mathematical formulae relating various humeral head dimensional measurements are presented. The formulae derived in this study may be useful for the design of future prosthetic shoulder systems in which the goal is to replicate normal anatomy. This is the first study to describe that the elliptical shape of the base of the humeral head elongates as head size increases.
Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Humeral head; anthropometry; dimensions; elliptical; formula; gender; shape; size

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27068383     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  6 in total

Review 1.  Humeral Head Shape in Native and Prosthetic Joint Replacement.

Authors:  Joseph P Iannotti; Bong Jae Jun; Jason Teplensky; Eric Ricchetti
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2019-05-15

2.  Geometric analysis of the humeral head and glenoid in the Indian population and its clinical significance.

Authors:  Dipit Sahu; Moksha Joshi; Vaibhavi Rathod; Priyansh Nathani; Anisha S Valavi; Jairam D Jagiasi
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-07-22

3.  Rotational range of motion of elliptical and spherical heads in shoulder arthroplasty: a dynamic biomechanical evaluation.

Authors:  Lukas N Muench; Alexander Otto; Cameron Kia; Elifho Obopilwe; Mark P Cote; Andreas B Imhoff; Knut Beitzel; Augustus D Mazzocca; Julian Mehl
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Radiographic evaluation of humeral head reconstruction with stemmed and stemless spherical implants compared with stemless elliptical head implants.

Authors:  Leonardo Cavinatto; Omar Khatib; Alexander Martusiewicz; Denise M Koueiter; Brett P Wiater; J Michael Wiater
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-05-23

5.  A Method to Facilitate Improved Positioning of a Reverse Prosthesis Stem During Arthroplasty Surgery: The Metaphyseal-centering Technique.

Authors:  C Scott Humphrey; Jonathan T Bravman
Journal:  Tech Shoulder Elb Surg       Date:  2018-05-01

6.  Anatomic variations in glenohumeral joint: an interpopulation study.

Authors:  Roopam Dey; Steven Roche; Theo Rosch; Tinashe Mutsvangwa; Johan Charilaou; Sudesh Sivarasu
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2018-02-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.