| Literature DB >> 27067801 |
Kotaro Miura1, Kenjiro Kimura2, Ryosuke Amano1, Sadaaki Yamazoe1, Go Ohira1, Akihiro Murata3, Kohei Nishio1, Tsuyoshi Hasegawa4, Masakazu Yashiro1, Bunzo Nakata5, Masaichi Ohira1, Kosei Hirakawa1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anaplastic pancreatic cancer (APC) cell lines have been scarcely established.Entities:
Keywords: Anaplastic pancreatic cancer; Human cell line; Rare malignancy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27067801 PMCID: PMC4828819 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2297-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Photographs of the two established anaplastic pancreatic cancer cell lines taken by the phase-contrast microscope. a OCUP-A1. (original magnification × 100). b OCUP-A2. (original magnification × 100)
Fig. 2Representative karyotype analysis of the two established anaplastic pancreatic cancer cell lines using the G-banding method. The figure displays the chromosome construction of OCUP-A1 (Fig. 2a) and OCUP-A2 (Fig. 2b). The arrow designates the reconstructive chromosome. The marker chromosome is different from standard diploid and has a break point
Gene mutation status of OCUP-A1 and OCUP-A2
| Chromosome # | Gene | OCUP-A1 | OCUP-A2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | ERBB4 | g. 212812097 T > C (54.2 %) | g. 212812097 T > C (18.4 %) |
| 2 | ALK | - | g. 29432625 C > A (16.4 %) |
| 3 | PIK3CA | H1047R (77.3 %) | - |
| 4 | FGFR3 | g. 1807894G > A (100 %) | g. 1807894G > A (100 %) |
| 4 | PDGFRA | V824V (97.5 %) | g. 55141055 A > G (100 %) |
| g. 55141055 A > G (100 %) | |||
| 4 | KDR | g. 55980239 C > T (99.0 %) | g. 55980239 C > T (100 %) |
| 5 | APC | g. 112175770 G > A (97.7 %) | g. 112175770 G > A (96.9 %) |
| 5 | CSF1R | g. 149433596 G > A (99.5 %) | - |
| g. 149433597 C > T (95.3 %) | |||
| 10 | RET | - | g. 43613843 G > T (63.5 %) |
| 12 | KRAS | G12D (98.5 %) | G12R (57.3 %) |
| 13 | FLT3 | g. 28610183 A > G (100 %) | g. 28610183 A > G (100 %) |
| 17 | TP53 | R209fs*6 (50.3 %) D208E (99.6 %) | g. 7578369 A > C (100 %) |
| g.7578222_7578225del (49.7 %) | g. 7579472 G > C (92.3 %) | ||
| 19 | STK11 | g. 1220321 T > C (42.0 %) | g. 1220321 T > C (100 %) |
Gene mutations were examined with Ion AmpliSeq™ Cancer Hotspot Panel v2
Doubling time in pancreatic cancer cell lines
| Cell line | Doubling time (hours) |
|---|---|
| OCUP-A1 | 20.6 ± 1.2 |
| OCUP-A2 | 20.6 ± 1.4 |
| Panc-1 | 25.8 ± 2.8 |
| MIAPaCa-2 | 25.7 ± 4.3 |
| RWP-1 | 23.6 ± 0.54 |
| SW1990 | 35.8 ± 4.4 |
OCUP-A1 and OCUP-A2 vs SW1990; p < 0.05
Fig. 3Migration and invasion of pancreatic cancer cell lines. Relative wound density designates the percentage of scratch area where cancer cells migrated or invaded
IC50 values of anti-cancer drugs for pancreatic cancer cell lines
| Drug | 5-FU (μM) | GEM (nM) | IRI (μM) | OXA (μM) | PTX (nM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCUP-A1 | 51.1 ± 5.1 | 6.60 ± 1.4 | 5.21 ± 0.20 | 17.6 ± 0.94 | 15.7 ± 0.60 |
| OCUP-A2 | 23.8 ± 6.3 | 6.01 ± 0.60 | 1.67 ± 0.075* | 1.63 ± 0.070* | 3.63 ± 0.14* |
| Panc-1 | 24.2 ± 12 | 59.2 ± 5.5*** | 8.90 ± 0.49*** | 9.25 ± 1.4 | 27.8 ± 0.95*** |
| MIAPaCa-2 | 10.7 ± 2.4* | 24.0 ± 10*** | 15.3 ± 0.28*** | 20.1 ± 0.91** | 6.92 ± 0.14*,** |
| RWP-1 | 11.6 ± 1.8* | 4.45 ± 1.3 | 7.02 ± 0.50*** | 18.4 ± 0.88 | 3.45 ± 0.046* |
| SW1990 | 68.2 ± 15** | 92.0 ± 4.3*** | 10.5 ± 0.47*** | 72.9 ± 6.8*** | 21.3 ± 0.86*** |
5-FU 5-fluorouracil, GEM gemcitabine, IRI irinotecan, OXA oxaliplatin, PTX paclitaxel
*vs OCUP-A1; p < 0.05
**vs OCUP-A2; p < 0.05
***vs OCUP-A1 and OCUP-A2; p < 0.05
Tumor markers in supernatant of pancreatic cancer cell lines
| CEA | CA19-9 | SPan-1 | DUPAN-2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (ng/mL) | (U/mL) | (U/mL) | (U/mL) | |
| OCUP-A1 | <0.5 | <1.2 | <3 | <25 |
| OCUP-A2 | <0.5 | <1.2 | <3 | <25 |
| Panc-1 | <0.5 | <1.2 | <3 | <25 |
| MIAPaCa2 | <0.5 | <1.2 | <3 | <25 |
| RWP1 | 24.6 | 3020 | 865 | 24.6 |
| SW1990 | 2.8 | 4720 | 2050 | 2.8 |
CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9 carbohydrate antigen 19-9
Fig. 4Tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) stimulation derived from cell lines and the values of VEGF in supernatant of pancreatic cancer cell lines
Fig. 5Regarding confluence incubated under hypoxic condition as standard value, the confluence under hypoxic condition was compared with the confluence under normoxic condition in each cell line
Fig. 6Western blot analysis of E-cadherin and vimentin of OCUP-A1 and OCUP-A2. MCF7 was used as positive E-cadherin and negative vimentin controls
Fig. 7Analysis of side population (SP) cells in pancreatic cancer cell lines. a Representative figure of flow cytometry. The fraction of SP cells in each cell line is outlined by the white line. Each cell line was stained with Hoechst 33342 in the presence or absence of verapamil (shown as bottom panel or upper panel, respectively). SP cells disappeared with verapamil. b The percentage of SP fraction in each cell line
Fig. 8Growth curve of xenografts of pancreatic cancer cell lines (n = 5). Tumors developed in all mice using for this assay
Fig. 9Immunostaining of primary tumor and xenograft in OCUP-A1 and OCUP-A2. All specimens showed loss of E-cadherin expression and gain in vimentin expression. The expression pattern was consistent with the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype (original magnification × 400)