Literature DB >> 27067755

Does High Hip Center Decrease Range of Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Computer Simulation Study.

Keisuke Komiyama1, Yasuharu Nakashima1, Masanobu Hirata1, Daisuke Hara1, Yusuke Kohno1, Yukihide Iwamoto1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High placement of a cementless acetabular cup is often required to have sufficient bone coverage in hip dysplasia. We examined whether a high hip center decreases the postoperative range of motion (ROM) in total hip arthroplasty.
METHODS: Using a computer software, ROM and bone coverage were examined in 32 patients with unilateral osteoarthritis of the hip with Crowe type II or III hip dysplasia. The cup was placed at the anatomic hip center and moved vertically in 5-mm increments. Vertical center of rotation (V-COR) was defined as the distance from the head center to the interteardrop line. The required ROM was defined as flexion  ≥110°, internal rotation (IR) at 90° flexion ≥30°, extension ≥30°, and external rotation ≥30°. We determined the V-COR to satisfy the required ROM and cup center-edge angle (Cup-CE) ≥0°.
RESULTS: Only 40.6% of the patients satisfied Cup-CE ≥0° at the anatomic hip center. Bone coverage increased with the peak at 30, 35 mm of V-COR (90.6% satisfied Cup-CE ≥0°) and decreased at ≥40 mm. Higher V-COR resulted in lower range of flexion and IR, but increased the range of extension and external rotation. The cutoff value from the receiver-operating characteristic curve for both flexion and IR was a V-COR of 35 mm.
CONCLUSION: The higher hip center gained more bone coverage but decreased the range of hip flexion and IR. Acceptable V-COR in hip dysplasia was around 35 mm, about 20 mm above the true hip center, in terms of ROM.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer simulation; high hip center; hip dysplasia; range of motion; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27067755     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  12 in total

1.  Total hip arthroplasty after periacetabular osteotomy versus primary total hip arthroplasty: a propensity-matched cohort study.

Authors:  Keisuke Komiyama; Satoshi Hamai; Goro Motomura; Satoshi Ikemura; Masanori Fujii; Shinya Kawahara; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Does accelerometer-based portable navigation provide more accurate and precise cup orientation without prosthetic impingement than conventional total hip arthroplasty? A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Masato Kiyohara; Satoshi Hamai; Kyohei Shiomoto; Satoru Harada; Tetsunari Harada; Goro Motomura; Satoshi Ikemura; Masanori Fujii; Shinya Kawahara; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Does high hip centre affect dislocation after total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip?

Authors:  Keisuke Komiyama; Jun-Ichi Fukushi; Goro Motomura; Satoshi Hamai; Satoshi Ikemura; Masanori Fujii; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Best bone of acetabulum for cup component placement in Crowe types I to III dysplastic hips: a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Lin-Li Zheng; Yang-Yang Lin; Xiao-Yan Zhang; Qian-Hui Ling; Wei-Ming Liao; Pei-Hui Wu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Cup-Cage Solution for Massive Acetabular Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chao-Xin Wang; Zi-da Huang; Bai-Jian Wu; Wen-Bo Li; Xin-Yu Fang; Wen-Ming Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  Satisfactory Outcomes in Patients Operated With Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Perthes-like Deformities: Results From a Surgical Technique Utilizing a Conical Stem, an Elevated Hip Center, and No Shortening Femoral Osteotomy.

Authors:  Eiji Takahashi; Ayumi Kaneuji; Isabella Florissi; Charles R Bragdon; Henrik Malchau; Norio Kawahara
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-12-25

7.  Restoration of the hip geometry after two-stage exchange with intermediate resection arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Jan Hubert; Frank Timo Beil; Tim Rolvien; Christian Ries; Stephan Frosch; Dominik Saul; Thelonius Hawellek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Segmental uncoverage ratio analysis of Crowe type-IV developmental dysplasia of the hip via 3-dimensional implantation simulation.

Authors:  Yiming Dou; Jianlin Xiao; Xinggui Wen; Jianpeng Gao; Hao Tian; Jianlin Zuo
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-05-19

9.  Determination of the hip rotation centre from landmarks in pelvic radiograph.

Authors:  Hasan Bombaci; Bestami Simsek; Mehmet Soyarslan; Mustafa Murat Yildirim
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 1.511

10.  A Workflow Change in Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Leads to Improved Accuracy of Biomechanical Reconstruction Without Increased Risk of Complications.

Authors:  Stephanie V Kaszuba; Kyle M Behrens; Chad B Anderson; Alexander C Gordon
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.