S R Andresen1, F Biering-Sørensen2, E M Hagen1,3,4, J F Nielsen5, F W Bach6, N B Finnerup7. 1. Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark, Neurological Department, Regional Hospital of Viborg, Viborg, Denmark. 2. Clinic for Spinal Cord Injuries, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. 4. The Autonomic Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London, London, UK. 5. Hammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Center, Hammel, Denmark. 6. Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 7. Danish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence, predictors and impact of self-reported pain and spasticity and examine variables affecting quality of life in individuals with a traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Nationwide, Denmark. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was sent out to individuals with a traumatic SCI. The questionnaire included questions about demographics and SCI characteristics, pain, spasticity and quality of life. RESULTS: In total, 537 questionnaires were completed. Seventy-three percent reported chronic pain of which 60% used descriptors suggestive of neuropathic pain. The average pain intensity and interference were 5.6 (s.d. 2.3) and 5.0 (s.d. 2.8), respectively, on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS), and 28.1% reported severe pain. Seventy-one percent reported spasticity. Average interference of spasticity was 2.9 (s.d. 2.7). Quality of life scores were 6.5 (s.d. 2.5) for life and life situation, 5.5 (s.d. 2.6) for physical health and 6.7 (s.d. 2.6) for mental health on the NRS (0-10). Female gender was associated with lower mental health scores and tetraplegia with lower physical health scores, and high pain interference and shorter time since injury were associated with lower quality-of-life scores for all three parameters. Pain with descriptors suggestive of neuropathic pain was associated with lower quality-of-life scores than pain without such descriptors. CONCLUSION: Chronic pain and spasticity are common problems after SCI, and in particular, high pain interference is associated with lower quality of life.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence, predictors and impact of self-reported pain and spasticity and examine variables affecting quality of life in individuals with a traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Nationwide, Denmark. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was sent out to individuals with a traumatic SCI. The questionnaire included questions about demographics and SCI characteristics, pain, spasticity and quality of life. RESULTS: In total, 537 questionnaires were completed. Seventy-three percent reported chronic pain of which 60% used descriptors suggestive of neuropathic pain. The average pain intensity and interference were 5.6 (s.d. 2.3) and 5.0 (s.d. 2.8), respectively, on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS), and 28.1% reported severe pain. Seventy-one percent reported spasticity. Average interference of spasticity was 2.9 (s.d. 2.7). Quality of life scores were 6.5 (s.d. 2.5) for life and life situation, 5.5 (s.d. 2.6) for physical health and 6.7 (s.d. 2.6) for mental health on the NRS (0-10). Female gender was associated with lower mental health scores and tetraplegia with lower physical health scores, and high pain interference and shorter time since injury were associated with lower quality-of-life scores for all three parameters. Pain with descriptors suggestive of neuropathic pain was associated with lower quality-of-life scores than pain without such descriptors. CONCLUSION: Chronic pain and spasticity are common problems after SCI, and in particular, high pain interference is associated with lower quality of life.
Authors: N Nagoshi; S Kaneko; K Fujiyoshi; M Takemitsu; M Yagi; S Iizuka; A Miyake; A Hasegawa; M Machida; T Konomi; M Machida; T Asazuma; M Nakamura Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Christel M C van Leeuwen; Marcel W M Post; Floris W A van Asbeck; Helma M H Bongers-Janssen; Lucas H V van der Woude; Sonja de Groot; Eline Lindeman Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: G Landmann; E-C Chang; W Dumat; A Lutz; R Müller; A Scheel-Sailer; K Schwerzmann; N Sigajew; A Ljutow Journal: Schmerz Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 1.107
Authors: Camilla M Larsen; Birgit Juul-Kristensen; Helge Kasch; Jan Hartvigsen; Lars H Frich; Eleanor Boyle; Lasse Østengaard; Fin Biering-Sørensen Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2020-12-15 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Georgene W Hergenroeder; John B Redell; H Alex Choi; Lisa Schmitt; William Donovan; Gerard E Francisco; Karl Schmitt; Anthony N Moore; Pramod K Dash Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 5.269