Alison Zucca1, Rob Sanson-Fisher2, Amy Waller2, Mariko Carey2, Elizabeth Fradgley2, Tim Regan2. 1. Health Behaviour Research Group, Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: Alison.Zucca@newcastle.edu.au. 2. Health Behaviour Research Group, Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Identifying modifiable gaps in the symptom management pathway, as perceived by patients, is the first step to relieving patient suffering. OBJECTIVES: The objective is to describe the proportion of patients experiencing treatable cancer-related symptoms who reported 1) a health care provider at the treatment center offered assistance for their symptom, 2) they accepted the assistance offered, and 3) the assistance relieved suffering. Variation in symptom management among treatment centers also was examined. METHODS: A survey was done with 528 medical oncology outpatients recruited from six treatment centers. Eight items explored management of prevalent, burdensome, and treatable cancer-related symptoms: pain, fatigue, other physical side effects, and emotional distress. Participants were asked about symptom management provided at the clinic from where they were recruited. Questions referred to the last occasion the patient experienced the symptom. RESULTS: Fewer patients were offered help to relieve fatigue (44%) and emotional distress (57%), than pain (90%) and other physical side effects (84%). In most cases, help was not offered as clinic staff were not aware of the patient's symptom. Although the vast majority of patients accepted the help that was offered, more patients accepted help for physical symptoms (pain, 97%; fatigue, 95%; and other side effects, 98%) than emotional symptoms (87%). When care was provided, most patients experienced at least a little relief from pain (99%), fatigue (94%), and emotional distress (96%). Symptom management did not vary significantly by treatment center (P = 0.073). CONCLUSION: Quality improvement initiatives must focus primarily on improving providers' awareness of their patients' symptoms and ensuring that patients are subsequently offered help.
CONTEXT: Identifying modifiable gaps in the symptom management pathway, as perceived by patients, is the first step to relieving patient suffering. OBJECTIVES: The objective is to describe the proportion of patients experiencing treatable cancer-related symptoms who reported 1) a health care provider at the treatment center offered assistance for their symptom, 2) they accepted the assistance offered, and 3) the assistance relieved suffering. Variation in symptom management among treatment centers also was examined. METHODS: A survey was done with 528 medical oncology outpatients recruited from six treatment centers. Eight items explored management of prevalent, burdensome, and treatable cancer-related symptoms: pain, fatigue, other physical side effects, and emotional distress. Participants were asked about symptom management provided at the clinic from where they were recruited. Questions referred to the last occasion the patient experienced the symptom. RESULTS: Fewer patients were offered help to relieve fatigue (44%) and emotional distress (57%), than pain (90%) and other physical side effects (84%). In most cases, help was not offered as clinic staff were not aware of the patient's symptom. Although the vast majority of patients accepted the help that was offered, more patients accepted help for physical symptoms (pain, 97%; fatigue, 95%; and other side effects, 98%) than emotional symptoms (87%). When care was provided, most patients experienced at least a little relief from pain (99%), fatigue (94%), and emotional distress (96%). Symptom management did not vary significantly by treatment center (P = 0.073). CONCLUSION: Quality improvement initiatives must focus primarily on improving providers' awareness of their patients' symptoms and ensuring that patients are subsequently offered help.
Authors: Elise Mansfield; Lisa Mackenzie; Mariko Carey; Kerry Peek; Jan Shepherd; Tiffany-Jane Evans Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jennifer Philip; Anna Collins; Brian Le; Vijaya Sundararajan; Caroline Brand; Susan Hanson; Jon Emery; Peter Hudson; Linda Mileshkin; Soula Ganiatsas Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2019-03-14
Authors: Kristen McCarter; Melissa A Carlson; Amanda L Baker; Chris L Paul; James Lynam; Lana N Johnston; Elizabeth A Fradgley Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Joanne Shaw; Karen Allison; Jessica Cuddy; Toni Lindsay; Peter Grimison; Heather Shepherd; Phyllis Butow; Tim Shaw; Kate Baychek; Brian Kelly Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 2.655