| Literature DB >> 27066503 |
Mehmet Bilgehan Pektas1, Halit Bugra Koca2, Gokhan Sadi3, Fatma Akar4.
Abstract
The effects of high-fructose diet on adipose tissue insulin signaling and inflammatory process have been poorly documented. In this study, we examined the influences of long-term fructose intake and resveratrol supplementation on the expression of genes involved in insulin signaling and the levels of inflammatory cytokines and sex hormones in the white adipose tissues of male and female rats. Consumption of high-fructose diet for 24 weeks increased the expression of genes involved in insulin signaling including IR, IRS-1, IRS-2, Akt, PI3K, eNOS, mTOR, and PPARγ, despite induction of proinflammatory markers, iNOS, TNFα, IL-1β, IL-18, MDA, and ALT, as well as anti-inflammatory factors, IL-10 and Nrf2 in adipose tissues from males and females. Total and free testosterone concentrations of adipose tissues were impaired in males but increased in females, although there were no changes in their blood levels. Resveratrol supplementation markedly restored the levels of MDA, IL6, IL-10, and IL-18, as well as iNOS, Nrf2, and PI3K mRNA, in adipose tissues of both genders. Dietary fructose activates both insulin signaling and inflammatory pathway in the adipose tissues of male and female rats proposing no correlation between the tissue insulin signaling and inflammation. Resveratrol has partly modulatory effects on fructose-induced changes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27066503 PMCID: PMC4811063 DOI: 10.1155/2016/8014252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Primer sequences of IRβ, IRS-1, IRS-2, Akt, PI3K, eNOS, SIRT1, mTOR, PPARγ, Nrf2, NFκB, iNOS, and internal standard GAPDH used for the mRNA expression determination of qRT-PCR.
| Gene | Forward primer sequence (5′ → 3′) | Reverse primer sequence (5′ → 3′) | Product | Gene bank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| GTGCTGCTCATGTCCTTAGA | AATGGTCTGTGCTCTTCGTG | 234 | XM_006248753.2 |
|
| GCCAATCTTCATCCAGTTGC | CATCGTGAAGAAGGCATAGG | 337 | NM_012969.1 |
|
| CTACCCACTGAGCCCAAGAG | CCAGGGATGAAGCAGGACTA | 151 | NM_001168633.1 |
|
| GAAGAAGAGCTCGCCTCCAT | GAAGGAGAAGGCCACAGGTC | 211 | NM_033230.2 |
|
| ATGCAACTGCCTTGCACATT | CGCCTGAAGCTGAGCAACAT | 320 | NM_053481.2 |
|
| TGCACCCTTCCGGGGATTCT | GGATCCCTGGAAAAGGCGGT | 189 | XM_006235872.1 |
|
| CGGTCTGTCAGCATCATCTTCC | CGCCTTATCCTCTAGTTCCTGTG | 136 | XM_008772947.1 |
|
| GCAATGGGCACGAGTTTGTT | AGTGTGTTCACCAGGCCAAA | 94 | NM_019906.1 |
|
| CTCAGGTCAGAGTCGCCCC | GAGAGAGACCTCGTCAGGCT | 205 | NM_001145367.1 |
|
| GATTCGTGCACAGCAGCA | GCCAGCTGAACTCCTTAGAC | 466 | XM_006234397.2 |
|
| GGGTCAGAGGCCAATAGAGA | CCTAGCTTTCTCTGAACTGCAAA | 71 | AF_079314.1 |
|
| CTTCAGGTATGCGGTATTGG | CATGGTGAACACGTTCTTGG | 352 | XM_006246949.2 |
|
| TGATGACATCAAGAAGGTGGTGAAG | TCCTTGGAGGCCATGTGGGCCAT | 240 | NM_017008.4 |
Effects of long-term dietary fructose (Fruc), resveratrol (Res), and their combinations (Res + Fruc) on some metabolic parameters and plasma insulin, triglyceride, estradiol, and free testosterone and total testosterone of male and female rats.
| Groups | Control | Res | Fruc | Res + Fruc | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal body weight (g) | Male | 370 ± 10.7 | 335 ± 4.1 | 415 ± 6.5 | 371 ± 5.1# |
| Female | 249 ± 6.7† | 227 ± 7.5† | 260 ± 1.8† | 235 ± 1.5# | |
|
| |||||
| Food intake (g/day) | Male | 20.74 ± 0.83 | 24.6 ± 1.1 | 20.5 ± 1.1 | 21.9 ± 1.1 |
| Female | 14.4 ± 0.8† | 18.3 ± 0.6 | 12.7 ± 0.5† | 12.8 ± 0.4† | |
|
| |||||
| Liquid intake (mL/day) | Male | 46.5 ± 2.1 | 61.2 ± 2.4 | 56.8 ± 1.6 | 55.9 ± 1.6 |
| Female | 32.9 ± 0.9† | 38.9 ± 1.3 | 38.1 ± 1.3† | 37.8 ± 1.3† | |
|
| |||||
| Total caloric intake (kcal) | Male | 72.6 ± 2.9 | 86.1 ± 3.8 | 94.9 ± 4.2 | 99.5 ± 4.5 |
| Female | 50.5 ± 2.9† | 64.1 ± 2.2 | 60.1 ± 2.2 | 60.3 ± 2.1† | |
|
| |||||
| Resveratrol intake (mg/kg bw) | Male | — | 36 ± 1.2 | — | 29 ± 0.8 |
| Female | — | 40 ± 2.1 | — | 27 ± 0.5 | |
|
| |||||
| Fructose intake (g/day) | Male | — | — | 5.7 ± 0.2 | 5.6 ± 0.2 |
| Female | — | — | 3.8 ± 0.1 | 3.8 ± 0.1 | |
|
| |||||
| Omentum weight/body weight (%) | Male | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 1.39 ± 0.32 | 0.95 ± 0.10# |
| Female | 0.88 ± 0.04† | 0.59 ± 0.03 | 1.64 ± 0.23 | 1.20 ± 0.09# | |
|
| |||||
| Glucose (mg/dL) | Male | 129.5 ± 10.9 | 95.3 ± 6.1 | 129.4 ± 19.1 | 113.8 ± 8.6 |
| Female | 103.7 ± 3.7 | 87.6 ± 4.2 | 113.2 ± 7.8 | 100.9 ± 2.3 | |
|
| |||||
| Insulin (ng/mL) | Male | 0.48 ± 0.13 | 0.40 ± 0.09 | 4.38 ± 0.52 | 1.28 ± 0.27# |
| Female | 0.33 ± 0.08 | 0.29 ± 0.05 | 4.97 ± 0.34 | 2.08 ± 0.66# | |
|
| |||||
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | Male | 88.9 ± 9.4 | 49.2 ± 4.6 | 132.8 ± 8.5 | 57.4 ± 6.9# |
| Female | 81.6 ± 8.4 | 64 ± 8.3 | 205.1 ± 27.2 | 102.9 ± 14.1#† | |
|
| |||||
| Estradiol (pg/mL) | Male | 11.7 ± 1.3 | 9.3 ± 1.1 | 13 ± 2.3 | 9.9 ± 1.2 |
| Female | 41.6 ± 13† | 49.2 ± 10.6† | 33.8 ± 8.7† | 43.1 ± 6.9† | |
|
| |||||
| Free testosterone (pg/mL) | Male | 25.7 ± 0.6 | 23.1 ± 0.9 | 23.1 ± 1.9 | 29.3 ± 1# |
| Female | 2.5 ± 0.17† | 3.1 ± 0.09 | 2.9 ± 0.09† | 2.7 ± 0.02† | |
|
| |||||
| Total testosterone (ng/mL) | Male | 3 ± 0.01 | 3.1 ± 0.12 | 2.7 ± 0.12 | 3 ± 0.1# |
| Female | 0.29 ± 0.01† | 0.29 ± 0.01† | 0.3 ± 0.01† | 0.27 ± 0.02† | |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6–12.
Significantly different (P < 0.05) compared to control group.
#Significantly different (P < 0.05) compared to fructose group.
†Significantly different (P < 0.05) compared to male group.
Effects of long-term dietary fructose (Fruc), resveratrol (Res), and their combinations (Res + Fruc) on some endocrine parameters and cytokines in the adipose tissues of male and female rats.
| Groups | Control | Res | Fruc | Res + Fruc | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insulin (mU/g protein) | Male | 1,54 ± 0.16 | 1.19 ± 0.17 | 2.75 ± 0.42 | 1.32 ± 0.27# |
| Female | 1.45 ± 0.16 | 0.79 ± 0.1 | 2.93 ± 0.26 | 1.63 ± 0.26# | |
|
| |||||
| Estradiol (pg/g protein) | Male | 9.1 ± 0.6 | 8.6 ± 1.1 | 13 ± 1.5 | 9 ± 1.1 |
| Female | 27.5 ± 8† | 28 ± 5.1† | 14 ± 1.8 | 22 ± 4.6† | |
|
| |||||
| Free testosterone (pg/g protein) | Male | 45 ± 4.9 | 48 ± 7.8 | 21 ± 2.8 | 26 ± 4 |
| Female | 2.8 ± 0.8† | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 5.6 ± 0.1 | 2 ± 0.4#† | |
|
| |||||
| Total testosterone (pg/g protein) | Male | 655 ± 51 | 581 ± 78 | 285 ± 33 | 332 ± 43 |
| Female | 32 ± 6.1† | 16 ± 3† | 68 ± 9.5 | 25.7 ± 4.9#† | |
|
| |||||
| MDA ( | Male | 16 ± 1.9 | 18 ± 4.9 | 26 ± 3.6 | 14 ± 1.9# |
| Female | 14 ± 2.1 | 5.3 ± 0.8 | 48 ± 13 | 12 ± 2.1# | |
|
| |||||
| ALT (U/g protein) | Male | 169 ± 14 | 192 ± 22 | 335 ± 73 | 448 ± 135 |
| Female | 272 ± 47 | 113 ± 13 | 736 ± 145 | 315 ± 39# | |
|
| |||||
| AST (U/g protein) | Male | 85 ± 5 | 119 ± 27 | 123 ± 28 | 271 ± 55# |
| Female | 164 ± 18† | 51 ± 11 | 346 ± 56 | 142.1 ± 5#† | |
|
| |||||
| TNF- | Male | 153 ± 10 | 163 ± 7 | 261 ± 31 | 218 ± 33 |
| Female | 111 ± 9† | 99 ± 6† | 319 ± 41 | 184 ± 38# | |
|
| |||||
| IL-1 | Male | 382 ± 30 | 250 ± 17 | 496 ± 38 | 548 ± 44 |
| Female | 241 ± 26† | 270 ± 17 | 703 ± 108 | 445 ± 68 | |
|
| |||||
| IL-6 (ng/g protein) | Male | 61 ± 4.6 | 46 ± 2.5 | 67 ± 6.4 | 36 ± 5.3# |
| Female | 13 ± 1.3† | 11 ± 1.9† | 51 ± 7.4 | 20 ± 3.1#† | |
|
| |||||
| IL-10 (ng/g protein) | Male | 50 ± 7.6 | 52 ± 4.7 | 83 ± 13.3 | 40 ± 5.8# |
| Female | 52 ± 6.2 | 33 ± 4.1† | 93 ± 7.6 | 55 ± 6.1# | |
|
| |||||
| IL-18 (MBL) ( | Male | 9.4 ± 1.6 | 7.6 ± 0.7 | 39 ± 7.7 | 19 ± 3.8# |
| Female | 7.5 ± 1.4 | 8.3 ± 0.6 | 37 ± 6.2 | 14 ± 2.5# | |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6–12.
Significantly different (P < 0.05) compared to control group.
#Significantly different (P < 0.05) compared to fructose group.
†Significantly different (P < 0.05) compared to male group.
Figure 1The mRNA expression levels of IRβ (a), IRS-1 (b), IRS-2 (c), Akt (d), PI3K (e), eNOS (f), SIRT1 (g), mTOR (h), PPARγ (i), Nrf2 (j), NFκB (k), and iNOS (l) in the adipose tissues of male and female rats from the control, resveratrol (Res), fructose (Fruc), and Res + Fruc groups. Data was normalized by GAPDH. Each bar represents the means of at least six rats. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6–12. Significantly different (P < 0.05) compared to control group; #significantly different (P < 0.05) compared to fructose group; †significantly different (P < 0.05) compared to male group.