| Literature DB >> 27066379 |
Chaman Verma1, Sanjay Dahiya2.
Abstract
Nowadays, information and communication technology is major backbone of Indian education system. To support E-learning in Universities, information and communication technology (ICT) plays a momentous job. Several experts discussed about ICT awareness among students, teachers, and research scholars to take it into their learning and teaching methodology. Many of Universities either government or private are supporting the utilization of various ICT tools in teaching and learning practice. There is wide need to determine educator's behaviour towards ICT adoption to promote and enhance their learning skills. Students and faculty must confess that ICT awareness is key rod to access the technological services. This paper focuses on ICT awareness among students and faculty residing in Indian Universities. The concerned paper is describing the attitude of students and faculty towards ICT awareness in relation to their gender using statistical tools. More than nine hundred samples have been gathered from six Indian universities. The findings of this paper will help to Indian Universities administration to get aware about current scenario of ICT involvement in education system therein.Entities:
Keywords: Hypothesis; Likert-scale; Mean; Standard deviation; T test
Year: 2016 PMID: 27066379 PMCID: PMC4805674 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2003-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Instrument dependant variables
|
| |
| Availability | |
| 1 | Adequate ICT infrastructure is available |
| 2 | Institution campus is Wi-Fi |
| 3 | Sufficient bandwidth is available for Internet |
| 4 | ICT tools/software are easy accessible |
| 5 | Institutions have clear policy framework to integrate ICT |
| 6 | Sufficient funds are available to promote ICT based research and development |
| 7 | Sufficient ICT tools/software and hardware are available in research laboratory |
| 8 | Institutions have E-library |
| 9 | Adequate E-journals/E-contents are available in library |
| 10 | E-contents are easily accessible/subscribed in library |
| Usability | |
| 11 | ICT used in Planning and Management |
| 12 | ICT tools/software used in research and development are reliable |
| 13 | Use of ICT encourages research and project development |
| 14 | ICT is used to exchange the research information with other organizations |
| 15 | ICT used adequately in teaching, learning and research activities |
| 16 | E-journals/E-contents effectively using in research and development |
| 17 | ICT is used to access the E-contents from other libraries |
| 18 | ICT is used to learn the lecture/lesson from other institutions experts through video conferencing |
|
| |
| Problems | |
| 19 | Time consuming to integrate ICT into teaching, learning, research and development |
| 20 | Lack of readiness to adopt ICT technology in teaching and learning |
| 21 | ICT tools/software not user friendly due to lack of training |
| Solutions | |
| 22 | Need to increase the latest ICT infrastructure |
| 23 | Internet bandwidth should be increased |
| 24 | Need to increase E-journals/E-contents as per requirement |
| 25 | Need to enhance ICT in teaching and learning |
| 26 | Need for training/workshop to learn ICT tools/software and equipment |
| Opportunities | |
| 27 | ICT increase the effective teaching and E-learning in classroom |
| 28 | Students and Teachers feel more professional, motivate, confident while using ICT resources |
| 29 | ICT provides more comprehensive material of a particular topic |
| 30 | ICT plays an important role in admission and examination |
| 31 | Integrate of ICT increase placement activities |
| 32 | ICT reduce the cost for information exchange |
| 33 | ICT helps in design to new projects in higher education |
| 34 | Successful ICT integration will brighten the future of higher education |
| 35 | Using the ICT available increases productivity in higher education |
Difficulty value of dependant variables
| S. no. | DV | Frequency | Variable no. | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | >0.75 | 02 | 23, 45 | Failed to reject |
| 2 | 0.20–0.75 | 35 | 7, 8, 9, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19, 24, 25, 28, 31, 32, 33, 36, 37, 41, 43, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55, 56, 58, 59, 61, 62, 64, 66 | Failed to reject |
| 3 | <0.20 | 33 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 13, 15, 17, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27, 29, 30, 34, 35, 38, 39, 40, 42, 53, 57, 60, 63, 65, 67, 68, 69, 70 | Failed to accept |
Discriminating power of variables
| S. no. | DP | Frequency | Variable nos. | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.40–0.9 | 26 | 9, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19, 23, 25, 31, 32, 33, 36, 37, 41, 43, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55, 56, 61 | Very good |
| 2 | 0.30–0.39 | 09 | 7, 8, 24, 28, 30, 44, 59, 62, 66 | Good |
| 3 | <0.19 | 35 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 13, 15, 17, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27, 29, 30, 34, 35, 38, 39, 40, 42, 53, 57, 60, 63, 65, 67, 68, 69, 70 | Poor |
Participated universities
| UNI’S | Haryana | Punjab | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Govt. | Private | Govt. | Private | ||||
| CDLU | GJUST | SGT | PU | CU | GKU | ||
| N | 144 | 138 | 148 | 143 | 198 | 133 | 904 |
| % | 15.9 | 15.3 | 16.4 | 15.8 | 21.9 | 14.7 | 100 |
Gender distribution of participants
| S. no. | Particular | Students | Faculty | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys | Girls | Male | Female | Male | Female | ||
| 1 | Frequency (n) | 274 | 286 | 175 | 169 | 449 | 455 |
| 2 | Percentage (p) | 48.9 | 51.1 | 50.9 | 49.1 | 100 | |
Gender wise student’s opinions analysis using T test
| Boys | Girls | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | 3.58 | 3.64 |
| Standard deviation | 0.39 | 0.38 |
| Variance | 0.151 | 0.145 |
| T value | 0.61 at df = 68 | |
Fig. 1Gender wise opinions difference among students
Gender wise faculty opinions analysis using T test
| Male | Female | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | 3.83 | 3.86 |
| Standard deviation | 0.25 | 0.21 |
| Variance | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| T value | 0.58 at df = 68 | |
Fig. 2Gender wise opinions difference among faculty
Overall opinions analysis using T test
| Over all males | Over all females | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | 3.68 | 3.72 |
| Standard deviation | 0.32 | 0.30 |
| Variance | 0.10 | 0.09 |
| T value | 0.57 at df = 68 | |
Fig. 3Overall opinions difference