| Literature DB >> 27066319 |
Nadja Scherbakov1, Michael Knops2, Nicole Ebner3, Miroslava Valentova4, Anja Sandek3, Ulrike Grittner2, Pius Dahinden5, Stefan Hettwer5, Jörg C Schefold6, Stephan von Haehling3, Stefan D Anker3, Michael Joebges7, Wolfram Doehner8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: C-terminal Agrin Fragment (CAF) has been proposed as a novel biomarker for sarcopenia originating from the degeneration of the neuromuscular junctions. In patients with stroke muscle wasting is a common observation that predicts functional outcome. We aimed to evaluate agrin sub-fragment CAF22 as a marker of decreased muscle mass and physical performance in the early phase after acute stroke.Entities:
Keywords: C‐terminal Agrin Fragment; Muscle wasting; Physical performance; Post‐stroke rehabilitation; Skeletal muscle mass; Stroke
Year: 2015 PMID: 27066319 PMCID: PMC4799857 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle ISSN: 2190-5991 Impact factor: 12.910
Figure 1Structure and cleavage sites of agrin.
Clinical characteristics of study groups
| Parameters | Controls n = 26 | Patients at admission n = 123 | Patients at discharge n = 123 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 67 ± 8 | 70 ± 11 | 70 ± 11 |
| Gender, f/m [m, %] | 17/9 [41] | 49/74 [60] | |
| Stroke ischaemic, n [%] / haemorrhagic, n [%] | 106 [86] / 17 [16] | ||
| Days after stroke | 23 ± 17 | 49 ± 18 | |
| CAF22, pMol | 95.7 ± 31.8 | 134.3 ± 52.3 | 118.2 ± 42.7 |
| CAF22, pMol, female | 102.6 ± 30.7 | 140.3 ± 51.6 | 119.5 ± 35.5 |
| CAP22, pMol, male | 82.7 ± 31.2 | 130.2 ± 52.7 | 117.3 ± 47.1 |
| Change of total CAF22, pMol | −16.1 ± 30.4 | ||
| Creatinine, mg/dL | 0.79 ± 0.14 | 0.97 ± 0.31 | 0.96 ± 0.33 |
| Sodium, mmol/L | 141.5 ± 3.3 | 140.1 ± 4.4 | 140.3 ± 2.7 |
| Potassium, mmol/L | 4.4 ± 0.4 | 4.4 ± 0.4 | 4.3 ± 0.5 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 25.6 ± 3.3 | 27.0 ± 4.9 | 26.0 ± 5.2 |
| Lean mass, kg | 46.9 ± 10.1 | 51.9 ± 11.7 | 51.6 ± 11.3 |
| Fat mass, kg | 24.9 ± 6.9 | 25.0 ± 9.7 | 23.4 ± 8.8 |
| Phase angle, | 5.7 ± 1.1 | 5.1 ± 1.0 | 5.0 ± 1.0 |
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001 vs. controls;
p < 0.001 vs. admission
Parameters of body composition and physical performance at admission and at discharge from the rehabilitation centre
| Parameters | At admission (n = 120) | At discharge (n = 120) |
|---|---|---|
| Lean mass increase, kg, n = 67 | 50.6 ± 11.8 | 51.7 ± 11.7 |
| Lean mass decrease, kg, n = 56 | 53.2 ± 11.7 | 51.7 ± 11.4 |
| Max hand grip strength paretic arm, kg | 15.8 ± 11.6 | 16.0 ± 11.7 |
| Max hand grip strength nonparetic arm, kg | 28.2 ± 11.1 | 29.6 ± 11.7 |
| Barthel Index score | 60 ± 22 | 73 ± 20 |
| Rivermead Motor Assessment score | 5.3 ± 2.0 | 7.2 ± 2.2 |
p < 0.001 vs. admission
Figure 2Hand grip strength of stroke patients compared to healthy controls (***p < 0.001 vs. controls; ###p < 0.001 vs. admission).
Figure 3CAF22 plasma level in stroke‐patients at admission to rehabilitation centre and at discharge compared to controls: All patients (A); Female patients (B); Male patients (C) (***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 vs. controls; ###p < 0.001 vs. admission).
A). Multiple regression analyses investigating change of hand grip strength during rehabilitation in stroke patients (n = 123)
| Parameter | Coefficient | p | r |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Change of hand grip strength of paretic arm vs. | 0.286 | ||
| Gender | 0.059 | 0.579 | |
| Age | −0.229 | 0.035 | |
| Change of CAF22 | −0.175 | 0.097 | |
| Creatinine | −0.102 | 0.353 | |
| 2. Change of hand grip strength of nonparetic arm vs. | 0.294 | ||
| Gender | 0.141 | 0.151 | |
| Age | −0.157 | 0.120 | |
| Change of CAF22 | −0.121 | 0.223 | |
| Creatinine | −0.189 | 0.069 | |
Multiple regression analysis investigating phase angle as a parameter of cell membrane integrity in stroke patients
| Parameter | Coefficient | p | r |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase angle vs. | 0.523 | ||
| Gender | 0.170 | 0.055 | |
| Age | −0.341 | 0.0003 | |
| Creatinine | 0.095 | 0.422 | |
| CAF22 | −0.267 | 0.026 | |