| Literature DB >> 27066270 |
Mesfin Yimam1, Ping Jiao1, Breanna Moore1, Mei Hong1, Sabrina Cleveland1, Min Chu1, Qi Jia1, Young-Chul Lee2, Hyun-Jin Kim2, Jeong-Bum Nam2, Mi-Ran Kim2, Eu-Jin Hyun2, Gayoung Jung3, Seon Gil Do3.
Abstract
Some botanicals have been reported to possess antioxidative activities acting as scavengers of free radicals rendering their usage in herbal medicine. Here we describe the potential use of "SAL," a standardized blend comprised of three extracts from Schisandra chinensis, Artemisia capillaris, and Aloe barbadensis, in mitigating chemically induced acute liver toxicities. Acetaminophen and carbon tetrachloride induced acute liver toxicity models in mice were utilized. Hepatic functional tests from serum collected at T24 and hepatic glutathione and superoxide dismutases from liver homogenates were evaluated. Histopathology analysis and merit of blending 3 standardized extracts were also confirmed. Statistically significant and dose-correlated inhibitions in serum ALT ranging from 52.5% (p = 0.004) to 34.6% (p = 0.05) in the APAP and 46.3% (p < 0.001) to 29.9% (p = 0.02) in the CCl4 models were observed for SAL administered at doses of 400-250 mg/kg. Moreover, SAL resulted in up to 60.6% and 80.2% reductions in serums AST and bile acid, respectively. The composition replenished depleted hepatic glutathione in association with an increase of hepatic superoxide dismutase. Unexpected synergistic protection from liver damage was also observed. Therefore, the composition SAL could be potentially utilized as an effective hepatic-detoxification agent for the protection from liver damage.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27066270 PMCID: PMC4811106 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3530971
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Metab ISSN: 2090-0724
Dose-correlated liver protection of the SAL composition in APAP/CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity model.
| Composition |
| Dose (mg/kg) |
Dose (mg/kg) | APAP (400 mg/kg) | CCL4 (25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum ALT (mean ± SD) |
| Serum ALT (mean ± SD) |
| ||||
| Control (−) | 10 | — | 0 | 37.4 ± 8.7 | — | 21.4 ± 4.7 | — |
|
| |||||||
| APAP/CCL4 | 10 | — | 0 | 8558.6 ± 2297.6 | — | 10616.4 ± 3386.3 | — |
|
| |||||||
| SAL | 10 | 250 | 66.7/133.3/50 | 5600.4 ± 3399.8 | 0.05 | 7445.3 ± 2472.2 | 0.02 |
| 10 | 325 | 86.7/173.3/65 | 4406.0 ± 3040.5 | 0.007 | 6417.8 ± 2421.0 | 0.003 | |
| 10 | 400 | 106.7/213.3/80 | 4065.1 ± 2046.9 | 0.004 | 5697.3 ± 2697.4 | <0.001 | |
Mice (n = 10) were orally given composition SAL at doses of 250, 300, and 400 mg/kg at −48 hr, −24 hr, −and 2 hr before APAP or CCl4 administration and +6 hr after induction of model suspended in 10% Tween-20. Hepatotoxicity models were induced using 400 mg/kg and 25 µL/kg APAP and CCl4, respectively. APAP/CCL4: the vehicle group of mice was induced by APAP/CCL4 and did not receive the SAL. Serum ALT was determined at T24. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. L498 = Schisandra, R684 = Artemisia, N-931 = Aloe polysaccharide with aloesin.
Unexpected synergistic effect of Schisandra chinensis, Artemisia capillaris, and N-931 in liver protection.
| Composition | Material | Dose (mg/kg) |
| Percent inhibition of vehicle | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APAP (400 mg/kg) | CCL4 (25 | ||||
| SAL |
| 106.7 | 10 | 18.4 | 17.5 |
|
| 213.3 | 10 | 20.8 | 22.8 | |
|
| 80.0 | 10 | 20.8 | 15.0 | |
| Expected | 400 | — | 48.8 | 45.9 | |
| Observed | 400 | 10 | 52.8 | 46.3 | |
Data of serum ALT are presented as percentage change of vehicle. Mice (n = 10) were given composition SAL (400 mg/kg), Schisandra (106.7 mg/kg), Artemisia (213.3 mg/kg), N-931 (80 mg/kg), and vehicle at −48 hr, −24 hr, and −2 hr and +6 hr after induction of model suspended in 10% Tween-20. Calculated value according to Colby's equation = A + B − C; that is, A = (X + Y + Z), B = (XYZ)/10000, and C = ((XY)+(XZ)+(YZ))/100. Data observed when a composition was orally administered at 400 mg/kg, when observed ≥ expected = unexpected synergy.
Figure 1Liver protection activity of the composition of SAL against its individual components at a Dose of 300 mg/kg in APAP-induced hepatotoxicity model. p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 2Liver protection activity of the composition of SAL against its individual components at a dose of 300 mg/kg in CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity model. p ≤ 0.05.
Effect of SAL (300 mg/kg) on the major biomarkers of liver in APAP model.
| Group | Material dose (mg/kg) |
| Survival rate | Analyte | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AST (U/L) | Bile acid ( | T. bilirubin (mg/dL) | Albumin (g/dL) | T. protein (g/dL) | ||||
| Control | 0 | 10 | 100 | 77.7 ± 28.3 | 1.0 + 0.0 | 0.1 + 0.0 | 2.67 + 0.09 | 4.70 + 0.24 |
| APAP (400 mg/kg) | 0 | 10 | 60 | 4707.7 ± 2899.1 | 76.2 + 24.8 | 0.5 + 0.2 | 2.33 + 0.20 | 4.43 + 0.22 |
| SAL | 300 | 10 | 90 | 1855.7 ± 1859.6 | 15.1 + 5.7 | 0.3 + 0.1 | 2.71 + 0.12 | 4.84 + 0.12 |
Mice (n = 10) were orally given composition SAL at doses of 300 mg/kg at −48 hr, −24 hr, and −2 hr before APAP administrations and +6 hr after induction of model suspended in 10% Tween-20. Hepatotoxicity models were induced using 400 mg/kg APAP administered orally. Serum was collected at T24. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. p ≤ 0.05.
Effect of SAL (400 mg/kg) on the major biomarkers of liver in CCl4 model.
| Analyte | Control ( | CCL4 (25 | CCl4 (25 | CCl4 (25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALT (U/L) | 20.0 ± 6.5 | 9796.5 ± 2223.4 | 6466.6 ± 2696.5 | 7352.1 ± 3157.4 |
| AST (U/L) | 69.9 ± 16.1 | 5031.8 ± 1510.2 | 2794.0 ± 1427.2 | 2957.3 ± 1451.6 |
| T. bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.17 ± 0.05 | 0.40 ± 0.11 | 0.31 ± 0.09 | 0.36 ± 0.10 |
| Direct bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.05 | 0.06 ± 0.05 |
| Indirect bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.17 ± 0.05 | 0.29 ± 0.09 | 0.27 ± 0.07 | 0.30 ± 0.08 |
| ALP (U/L) | 76.6 ± 15.7 | 139.7 ± 65.5 | 115.0 ± 19.5 | 111.5 ± 33.7 |
| Bile acid ( | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 30.1 ± 8.6 | 22.1 ± 7.4 | 28.9 ± 12.2 |
| T. protein (g/dL) | 4.50 ± 0.19 | 4.62 ± 0.20 | 4.61 ± 0.18 | 4.63 ± 0.18 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 2.42 ± 0.13 | 2.64 ± 0.07 | 2.60 ± 0.09 | 2.60 ± 0.12 |
| Globulin (g/dL) | 2.08 ± 0.14 | 1.98 ± 0.15 | 2.01 ± 0.18 | 2.03 ± 0.14 |
Mice (n = 10) were orally given composition SAL at doses of 400 mg/kg and UDCA at doses of 50 mg/kg at −48 hr, −24 hr, and −2 hr before intraperitoneal CCl4 injection and +6 hr after induction of model suspended in 10% Tween-20. Hepatotoxicity models were induced using 25 µL/kg of CCl4. Serum was collected at T24. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. p ≤ 0.05.
Effect of composition SAL on oxidative stress biomarkers in liver homogenates collected from CCl4induced hepatotoxicity model.
| Group | Dose (mg/kg) |
| GSH (nmole/mg of protein) | SOD (U/mg of protein) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 | 10 | 38.26 ± 9.52 | 19.04 ± 4.20 |
| CCl4 (25 | 0 | 9a | 57.87 ± 10.85 | 15.21 ± 6.09 |
| SAL | 400 | 9b | 72.91 ± 14.93 | 22.89 ± 7.95 |
| UDCA | 50 | 10 | 69.07 ± 10.09 | 19.48 ± 4.64 |
p ≤ 0.05; aMisdosed and hence data for one mouse was excluded; bNot enough blood to match liver homogenate data and hence one mouse was excluded. UDCA = ursodeoxycholic acid. Mice received three doses of the composition before model induction and a single dose after model induction.
Figure 3Histopathology of liver tissues from APAP and CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity models.