Hannah St Denis-Katz1, Bahareh B Ghaedi2, Aisling Fitzpatrick1, Jing Zhang3. 1. Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 2. Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada. 3. Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) is considered a cornerstone in the management of locally invasive breast cancer. We evaluated patient-reported outcomes of OBCS with contralateral balancing breast reduction mammoplasty and reviewed its oncologic outcomes and complications. METHODS: This is mixed method study design using retrospective chart review and prospective cohort study. Patient demographics were reviewed. Outcome measures included clinicopathologic characteristics, complications, margin status, local recurrence, tumor histopathologies, duration of follow-up, patient satisfaction, self-esteem, event-related stress, and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were included in this study. Complete excision with negative margins was obtained in 42 (87.5%) patients, positive margins in 6 (12.5%) patients, all who had re-excision with repeat lumpectomy. Thirteen patients developed minor complications, defined as being managed as an outpatient. No patients developed major complications requiring inpatient admission. These complications did not delay commencement of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Postsurgery BREAST-QTM26 scores demonstrated no statistical difference in satisfaction with breasts, nipples, and sexual well-being. There was high satisfaction with overall outcome with average score of 80.8%. For the Rosenberg self-esteem scale, the results were similar for 3- and 12-month post-operative indicating maintenance of normal self-esteem post-operatively. The Impact of Events Scale showed statistically significant difference at 12-month post-operative (25.1) when compared with preoperative scores indicating that patients had lower event-related stress. There was no significant change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. CONCLUSION: Our study has shown that the patient who undergo OBCS have high patient-reported outcomes with acceptable oncologic outcomes and complication rates.
INTRODUCTION: Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) is considered a cornerstone in the management of locally invasive breast cancer. We evaluated patient-reported outcomes of OBCS with contralateral balancing breast reduction mammoplasty and reviewed its oncologic outcomes and complications. METHODS: This is mixed method study design using retrospective chart review and prospective cohort study. Patient demographics were reviewed. Outcome measures included clinicopathologic characteristics, complications, margin status, local recurrence, tumor histopathologies, duration of follow-up, patient satisfaction, self-esteem, event-related stress, and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were included in this study. Complete excision with negative margins was obtained in 42 (87.5%) patients, positive margins in 6 (12.5%) patients, all who had re-excision with repeat lumpectomy. Thirteen patients developed minor complications, defined as being managed as an outpatient. No patients developed major complications requiring inpatient admission. These complications did not delay commencement of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Postsurgery BREAST-QTM26 scores demonstrated no statistical difference in satisfaction with breasts, nipples, and sexual well-being. There was high satisfaction with overall outcome with average score of 80.8%. For the Rosenberg self-esteem scale, the results were similar for 3- and 12-month post-operative indicating maintenance of normal self-esteem post-operatively. The Impact of Events Scale showed statistically significant difference at 12-month post-operative (25.1) when compared with preoperative scores indicating that patients had lower event-related stress. There was no significant change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. CONCLUSION: Our study has shown that the patient who undergo OBCS have high patient-reported outcomes with acceptable oncologic outcomes and complication rates.
Authors: Lucy De La Cruz; Stephanie A Blankenship; Abhishek Chatterjee; Rula Geha; Nadia Nocera; Brian J Czerniecki; Julia Tchou; Carla S Fisher Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: A S Lichter; M E Lippman; D N Danforth; T d'Angelo; S M Steinberg; E deMoss; H D MacDonald; C M Reichert; M Merino; S M Swain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1992-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J A van Dongen; A C Voogd; I S Fentiman; C Legrand; R J Sylvester; D Tong; E van der Schueren; P A Helle; K van Zijl; H Bartelink Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-07-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: F De Lorenzi; G Hubner; N Rotmensz; V Bagnardi; P Loschi; P Maisonneuve; M Venturino; R Orecchia; V Galimberti; P Veronesi; M Rietjens Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Max H Haloua; Nicole M A Krekel; Henri A H Winters; Derek H F Rietveld; Sybren Meijer; Frank W Bloemers; Monique P van den Tol Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Andrea L Pusic; Anne F Klassen; Amie M Scott; Jennifer A Klok; Peter G Cordeiro; Stefan J Cano Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Yasmin Grant; Paul T R Thiruchelvam; Lana Kovacevic; Elias Mossialos; Ragheed Al-Mufti; Katy Hogben; Dimitri J Hadjiminas; Daniel R Leff Journal: BJS Open Date: 2022-05-02