Literature DB >> 27064456

Heterogeneity in the Effects of Reward- and Deposit-based Financial Incentives on Smoking Cessation.

Scott D Halpern1,2,3,4, Benjamin French2,3, Dylan S Small2,5, Kathryn Saulsgiver2,3, Michael O Harhay3, Janet Audrain-McGovern2,6, George Loewenstein2,7, David A Asch1,2,4,8,9,10, Kevin G Volpp1,2,4,8,9,10.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Targeting different smoking cessation programs to smokers most likely to quit when using them could reduce the burden of lung disease.
OBJECTIVES: To identify smokers most likely to quit using pure reward-based financial incentives or incentive programs requiring refundable deposits to become eligible for rewards.
METHODS: We conducted prespecified secondary analyses of a randomized trial in which 2,538 smokers were assigned to an $800 reward contingent on sustained abstinence from smoking, a refundable $150 deposit plus a $650 reward, or usual care.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using logistic regression, we identified characteristics of smokers that were most strongly associated with accepting their assigned intervention and ceasing smoking for 6 months. We assessed modification of the acceptance, efficacy, and effectiveness of reward and deposit programs by 11 prospectively selected demographic, smoking-related, and psychological factors. Predictors of sustained smoking abstinence differed among participants assigned to reward- versus deposit-based incentives. However, greater readiness to quit and less steep discounting of future rewards were consistently among the most important predictors. Deposit-based programs were uniquely effective relative to usual care among men, higher-income participants, and participants who more commonly failed to pay their bills (all interaction P values < 0.10). Relative to rewards, deposits were more effective among black persons (P = 0.022) and those who more commonly failed to pay their bills (P = 0.082). Relative to rewards, deposits were more commonly accepted by higher-income participants, men, white persons, and those who less commonly failed to pay their bills (all P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity among smokers in their acceptance and response to different forms of incentives suggests potential benefits of targeting behavior-change interventions based on patient characteristics. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01526265).

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavior change; financial incentives; heterogeneity of treatment effect; smoking cessation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27064456      PMCID: PMC5067821          DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201601-0108OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  28 in total

1.  Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Delay discounting and probability discounting as related to cigarette smoking status in adults.

Authors:  Brady Reynolds; Jerry B Richards; Kimberly Horn; Katherine Karraker
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Episodic future thinking reduces reward delay discounting through an enhancement of prefrontal-mediotemporal interactions.

Authors:  Jan Peters; Christian Büchel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Redesigning employee health incentives--lessons from behavioral economics.

Authors:  Kevin G Volpp; David A Asch; Robert Galvin; George Loewenstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The role of behavioral economic incentive design and demographic characteristics in financial incentive-based approaches to changing health behaviors: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nancy Haff; Mitesh S Patel; Raymond Lim; Jingsan Zhu; Andrea B Troxel; David A Asch; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2015 May-Jun

6.  Delay discounting, locus of control, and cognitive impulsiveness independently predict tobacco dependence treatment outcomes in a highly dependent, lower socioeconomic group of smokers.

Authors:  Christine Sheffer; James Mackillop; John McGeary; Reid Landes; Lawrence Carter; Richard Yi; Bryan Jones; Darren Christensen; Maxine Stitzer; Lisa Jackson; Warren Bickel
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2012-04-06

7.  Measures of abstinence in clinical trials: issues and recommendations.

Authors:  John R Hughes; Josue P Keely; Ray S Niaura; Deborah J Ossip-Klein; Robyn L Richmond; Gary E Swan
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  An IV for the RCT: using instrumental variables to adjust for treatment contamination in randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Jeremy B Sussman; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-05-04

9.  Preference-adaptive randomization in comparative effectiveness studies.

Authors:  Benjamin French; Dylan S Small; Julie Novak; Kathryn A Saulsgiver; Michael O Harhay; David A Asch; Kevin G Volpp; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  The value of emotion: how does episodic prospection modulate delay discounting?

Authors:  Lei Liu; Tingyong Feng; Jing Chen; Hong Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Time to selected quit date and subsequent rates of sustained smoking abstinence.

Authors:  George L Anesi; Scott D Halpern; Michael O Harhay; Kevin G Volpp; Kathryn Saulsgiver
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-06-21

2.  Financial Incentives Promote Smoking Cessation Directly, Not by Increasing Use of Cessation Aids.

Authors:  Michael O Harhay; Andrea B Troxel; Christine Brophy; Kathryn Saulsgiver; Kevin G Volpp; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-02

3.  Electronic Cigarettes: A Role in Smoking Cessation?

Authors:  Christopher L Mosher; Joshua B Smith; William C McManigle; Coral X Giovacchini; Scott L Shofer
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Cohort profile for the Loma Linda University Health BREATHE programme: a model to study continuously incentivised employee smoking cessation.

Authors:  Pramil N Singh; Olivia Moses; Wendy Shih; Mark Hubbard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Prognosticating Outcomes and Nudging Decisions with Electronic Records in the Intensive Care Unit Trial Protocol.

Authors:  Katherine R Courtright; Erich M Dress; Jaspal Singh; Brian A Bayes; Marzana Chowdhury; Dylan S Small; Timothy Hetherington; Lindsay Plickert; Michael E Detsky; Jason N Doctor; Michael O Harhay; Henry L Burke; Michael B Green; Toan Huynh; D Matthew Sullivan; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-02

6.  Participation in a workplace smoking cessation program incentivized by lowering the cost of health care coverage: Findings from the LLUH BREATHE cohort.

Authors:  Olivia Moses; Brenda Rea; Ernie Medina; Dennys Estevez; Josileide Gaio; Mark Hubbard; Kelly Morton; Pramil N Singh
Journal:  Tob Prev Cessat       Date:  2020-04-07

7.  Incentive programmes for smoking cessation: cluster randomized trial in workplaces in Thailand.

Authors:  Justin S White; Christopher Lowenstein; Nucharee Srivirojana; Aree Jampaklay; William H Dow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-10-14

8.  PERSonalised Incentives for Supporting Tobacco cessation (PERSIST) among healthcare employees: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Nienke W Boderie; Johannes Lw van Kippersluis; Diarmaid T Ó Ceallaigh; Márta K Radó; Alex Burdorf; Frank J van Lenthe; Jasper V Been
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.