Literature DB >> 27064195

Gamma camera calibration and validation for quantitative SPECT imaging with (177)Lu.

M D'Arienzo1, M Cazzato2, M L Cozzella1, M Cox3, M D'Andrea2, A Fazio1, A Fenwick3, G Iaccarino2, L Johansson3, L Strigari2, S Ungania2, P De Felice1.   

Abstract

Over the last years (177)Lu has received considerable attention from the clinical nuclear medicine community thanks to its wide range of applications in molecular radiotherapy, especially in peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). In addition to short-range beta particles, (177)Lu emits low energy gamma radiation of 113keV and 208keV that allows gamma camera quantitative imaging. Despite quantitative cancer imaging in molecular radiotherapy having been proven to be a key instrument for the assessment of therapeutic response, at present no general clinically accepted quantitative imaging protocol exists and absolute quantification studies are usually based on individual initiatives. The aim of this work was to develop and evaluate an approach to gamma camera calibration for absolute quantification in tomographic imaging with (177)Lu. We assessed the gamma camera calibration factors for a Philips IRIX and Philips AXIS gamma camera system using various reference geometries, both in air and in water. Images were corrected for the major effects that contribute to image degradation, i.e. attenuation, scatter and dead- time. We validated our method in non-reference geometry using an anthropomorphic torso phantom provided with the liver cavity uniformly filled with (177)LuCl3. Our results showed that calibration factors depend on the particular reference condition. In general, acquisitions performed with the IRIX gamma camera provided good results at 208keV, with agreement within 5% for all geometries. The use of a Jaszczak 16mL hollow sphere in water provided calibration factors capable of recovering the activity in anthropomorphic geometry within 1% for the 208keV peak, for both gamma cameras. The point source provided the poorest results, most likely because scatter and attenuation correction are not incorporated in the calibration factor. However, for both gamma cameras all geometries provided calibration factors capable of recovering the activity in anthropomorphic geometry within about 10% (range -11.6% to +7.3%) for acquisitions at the 208keV photopeak. As a general rule, scatter and attenuation play a much larger role at 113keV compared to 208keV and are likely to hinder an accurate absolute quantification. Acquisitions of only the (177)Lu main photopeak (208keV) are therefore recommended in clinical practice. Preliminary results suggest that the gamma camera calibration factor can be assessed with a standard uncertainty below (or of the order of) 3% if activity is determined with equipment traceable to primary standards, accurate volume measurements are made, and an appropriate chemical carrier is used to allow a homogeneous and stable solution to be used during the measurements.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calibration; Gamma camera; Molecular radiotherapy; Quantitative imaging; Radionuclide therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27064195     DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot        ISSN: 0969-8043            Impact factor:   1.513


  6 in total

1.  Uncertainty Analysis in the Calibration of an Emission Tomography System for Quantitative Imaging.

Authors:  Marco D'Arienzo; Maurice Cox
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.238

2.  Quantitative accuracy of 177Lu SPECT imaging for molecular radiotherapy.

Authors:  Emilio Mezzenga; Vincenzo D'Errico; Marco D'Arienzo; Lidia Strigari; Koutla Panagiota; Federica Matteucci; Stefano Severi; Giovanni Paganelli; Andrew Fenwick; David Bianchini; Francesco Marcocci; Anna Sarnelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Accuracy of 177Lu activity quantification in SPECT imaging: a phantom study.

Authors:  Carlos F Uribe; Pedro L Esquinas; Jesse Tanguay; Marjorie Gonzalez; Emilie Gaudin; Jean-Mathieu Beauregard; Anna Celler
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2017-01-07

4.  Recommendations for Multicentre Clinical Trials Involving Dosimetry for Molecular Radiotherapy.

Authors:  J Taprogge; J Wadsley; E Miles; G D Flux
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.126

5.  The effect of calibration factors and recovery coefficients on 177Lu SPECT activity quantification accuracy: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Keamogetswe Ramonaheng; Johannes A van Staden; Hanlie du Raan
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2021-03-18

6.  Image-based SPECT calibration based on the evaluation of the Fraction of Activity in the Field of View.

Authors:  Adrien Halty; Jean-Noël Badel; Olga Kochebina; David Sarrut
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2018-05-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.