Literature DB >> 27063944

Evaluation of stress distributions occurring on zirconia and titanium implant-supported prostheses: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Merve Bankoğlu Güngör1, Handan Yılmaz2.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Titanium implants have been successfully used to support fixed dental prostheses. Zirconia implants have been suggested as support for crowns, but information on their use to support partial fixed dental prostheses is limited.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this finite element study was to evaluate the maximum principal, minimum principal, and von Mises stresses and their distributions on zirconia and titanium implant-supported, partial fixed dental prostheses located in the anterior maxillary region.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Zirconia and titanium implants (4 mm in diameter and 11. 5 mm in length) and prostheses made from 2 different materials (lithium disilicate and zirconia) were simulated, and 4 models were generated: Titan-IPS, Titan-Lava, Zircon-IPS, and Zircon-Lava. The maxillary bone was modeled as type 3 bone. The load was applied obliquely (534 N) and horizontally (76.5 N), and the stress values and distributions were examined.
RESULTS: Under horizontal loading, stresses generated on the cortical bone in the Zircon models were lower than those in the Titan models. Under oblique loading, stress values were similar in the same implant material and stress type. For all types of stress among the models, the stress values that occurred on the trabecular bone were found to be similar under both horizontal and oblique loading. The maximum stress values on the bones, implants, cores, and veneers did not exceed the strength of the structures.
CONCLUSIONS: Different stress values resulted from the different implant types. The prosthetic materials did not change the stress distributions in bone.
Copyright © 2016 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27063944     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  8 in total

1.  Impact of peri-implant bone resorption, prosthetic materials, and crown to implant ratio on the stress distribution of short implants: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Pinar Ercal; Aysegul Erten Taysi; Demet Cagil Ayvalioglu; Meltem Mert Eren; Soner Sismanoglu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Biomechanical Consequences of the Elastic Properties of Dental Implant Alloys on the Supporting Bone: Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Esteban Pérez-Pevida; Aritza Brizuela-Velasco; David Chávarri-Prado; Antonio Jiménez-Garrudo; Fernando Sánchez-Lasheras; Eneko Solaberrieta-Méndez; Markel Diéguez-Pereira; Felipe J Fernández-González; Borja Dehesa-Ibarra; Francesca Monticelli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Mechanical Characterisation and Biomechanical and Biological Behaviours of Ti-Zr Binary-Alloy Dental Implants.

Authors:  Aritza Brizuela-Velasco; Esteban Pérez-Pevida; Antonio Jiménez-Garrudo; Francisco Javier Gil-Mur; José María Manero; Miquel Punset-Fuste; David Chávarri-Prado; Markel Diéguez-Pereira; Francesca Monticelli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Comparative three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-supported fixed complete arch mandibular prostheses in two materials.

Authors:  João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Dayana Campanelli de Morais; Alexandre Abhdala Alonso; Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva; Alexandre Luis Souto Borges
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

5.  Comparative finite element analysis of mandibular posterior single zirconia and titanium implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Sung-Min Choi; Hyunsuk Choi; Du-Hyeong Lee; Min-Ho Hong
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Finite element evaluation to compare stress pattern in bone surrounding implant with carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone and commercially pure titanium implants.

Authors:  Syeda Amtul Haseeb; Vinaya K C; Neha Vijaykumar; Anju Sree Durga B; Anju S Kumar; Sruthi M K
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-07-15

7.  3D FEA Study On Implant Threading Role on Selection of Implant and Crown Materials.

Authors:  Ahmad Mohamad Wazeh; Mohamed I El-Anwar; Rami M Galal Atia; Rana Mohammed Mahjari; Sara Abdulelah Linga; Linah Mujeeb Alhaq Al-Pakistani; Salah Abdulazim Yousief
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-09-11

8.  Influence of Framework Material and Posterior Implant Angulation in Full-Arch All-on-4 Implant-Supported Prosthesis Stress Concentration.

Authors:  João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Dayana Campanelli de Morais; Jefferson David Melo de Matos; Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer Lopes; Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges; Marco Antonio Bottino; Antonio Lanzotti; Massimo Martorelli; Pietro Ausiello
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.