Colin Heus1, Hamit Cakir1, Arjan Lak1, Hiëronymus J Doodeman2, Alexander P J Houdijk3. 1. Department of Surgery, Medical Center Alkmaar, The Netherlands. 2. Trial Center Holland Health, Alkmaar, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Surgery, Medical Center Alkmaar, The Netherlands; Trial Center Holland Health, Alkmaar, The Netherlands. Electronic address: a.p.j.houdijk@mca.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiation has become a routine modality in the treatment of rectal carcinoma that may impair a patients general condition. In these patients, it is important to identify factors that influence postoperative recovery. Visceral obesity(VO) as a metabolic risk factor was studied in rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative chemoradiation. AIM: The impact of VO on post-operative outcome in rectal carcinoma surgery after preoperative chemoradiation was studied. In addition, the effect of chemoradiation on body composition was studied. METHOD: The visceral fat area(VFA), total fat area(TFA) and skeletal muscle area(SMA) were measured on cross-sectional CT-slides in 74 patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery after chemoradiation. CT-scans taken before and after chemoradiation were analysed. Associations between VFA, per- and postoperative complications were studied. A VFA of 100 cm(2) and 130 cm(2) was used to differentiate between non-VO and VO. RESULTS: Using a VO cut-off point of a VFA of 100 cm(2), the VO patients had more per-operative blood loss(471 mL vs 271 mL p = 0.020), a higher complication rate(10% vs 49% p = 0.001), more ileus(2% vs 28% p = 0.027) and a longer length of stay(9.7days vs 13days p = 0.027). When a VFA of 130 cm(2) was used, VO patients showed more complications(17% vs 55%, p = 0.001) and ileus(10% vs 32% p = 0.017). During chemoradiation the SMA increased(Mean difference: 2.2 cm(2) p = 0.024), while the VFA showed no change. CONCLUSION: It appears that VO is associated with co-morbidity and poor outcome in rectal cancer patients. Using different cutoff values for VO different associations with outcome were found. SMA increased during chemoradiation, a phenomenon that remains to be explained.
BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiation has become a routine modality in the treatment of rectal carcinoma that may impair a patients general condition. In these patients, it is important to identify factors that influence postoperative recovery. Visceral obesity(VO) as a metabolic risk factor was studied in rectal cancerpatients receiving preoperative chemoradiation. AIM: The impact of VO on post-operative outcome in rectal carcinoma surgery after preoperative chemoradiation was studied. In addition, the effect of chemoradiation on body composition was studied. METHOD: The visceral fat area(VFA), total fat area(TFA) and skeletal muscle area(SMA) were measured on cross-sectional CT-slides in 74 patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery after chemoradiation. CT-scans taken before and after chemoradiation were analysed. Associations between VFA, per- and postoperative complications were studied. A VFA of 100 cm(2) and 130 cm(2) was used to differentiate between non-VO and VO. RESULTS: Using a VO cut-off point of a VFA of 100 cm(2), the VOpatients had more per-operative blood loss(471 mL vs 271 mL p = 0.020), a higher complication rate(10% vs 49% p = 0.001), more ileus(2% vs 28% p = 0.027) and a longer length of stay(9.7days vs 13days p = 0.027). When a VFA of 130 cm(2) was used, VOpatients showed more complications(17% vs 55%, p = 0.001) and ileus(10% vs 32% p = 0.017). During chemoradiation the SMA increased(Mean difference: 2.2 cm(2) p = 0.024), while the VFA showed no change. CONCLUSION: It appears that VO is associated with co-morbidity and poor outcome in rectal cancerpatients. Using different cutoff values for VO different associations with outcome were found. SMA increased during chemoradiation, a phenomenon that remains to be explained.
Authors: Andrea Carolina Quiroga-Centeno; Kihara Alejandra Jerez-Torra; Pedro Antonio Martin-Mojica; Sergio Andrés Castañeda-Alfonso; María Emma Castillo-Sánchez; Oscar Fernando Calvo-Corredor; Sergio Alejandro Gómez-Ochoa Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: E Duchalais; N Machairas; S R Kelley; R G Landmann; A Merchea; D T Colibaseanu; K L Mathis; E J Dozois; D W Larson Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 4.584