Pratik Saxena1, Boon Chin Heng1, Peng Bai1, Marc Folcher1, Henryk Zulewski1,2, Martin Fussenegger1,3. 1. Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Mattenstrasse 26, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland. 2. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland. 3. Faculty of Science, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 26, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
Synthetic biology has advanced the design of standardized transcription control devices that programme cellular behaviour. By coupling synthetic signalling cascade- and transcription factor-based gene switches with reverse and differential sensitivity to the licensed food additive vanillic acid, we designed a synthetic lineage-control network combining vanillic acid-triggered mutually exclusive expression switches for the transcription factors Ngn3 (neurogenin 3; OFF-ON-OFF) and Pdx1 (pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1; ON-OFF-ON) with the concomitant induction of MafA (V-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homologue A; OFF-ON). This designer network consisting of different network topologies orchestrating the timely control of transgenic and genomic Ngn3, Pdx1 and MafA variants is able to programme human induced pluripotent stem cells (hIPSCs)-derived pancreatic progenitor cells into glucose-sensitive insulin-secreting beta-like cells, whose glucose-stimulated insulin-release dynamics are comparable to human pancreatic islets. Synthetic lineage-control networks may provide the missing link to genetically programme somatic cells into autologous cell phenotypes for regenerative medicine.
Synthetic biology has advanced the design of standardized transcription control devices that programme cellular behaviour. By coupling synthetic signalling cascade- and transcription factor-based gene switches with reverse and differential sensitivity to the licensed food additive vanillic acid, we designed a synthetic lineage-control network combining vanillic acid-triggered mutually exclusive expression switches for the transcription factors Ngn3 (neurogenin 3; OFF-ON-OFF) and Pdx1 (pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1; ON-OFF-ON) with the concomitant induction of MafA (V-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homologue A; OFF-ON). This designer network consisting of different network topologies orchestrating the timely control of transgenic and genomic Ngn3, Pdx1 and MafA variants is able to programme human induced pluripotent stem cells (hIPSCs)-derived pancreatic progenitor cells into glucose-sensitive insulin-secreting beta-like cells, whose glucose-stimulated insulin-release dynamics are comparable to human pancreatic islets. Synthetic lineage-control networks may provide the missing link to genetically programme somatic cells into autologous cell phenotypes for regenerative medicine.
Cell-fate decisions during development are regulated by various mechanisms, including
morphogen gradients, regulated activation and silencing of key transcription factors,
microRNAs, epigenetic modification and lateral inhibition. The latter implies that the
decision of one cell to adopt a specific phenotype is associated with the inhibition of
neighbouring cells to enter the same developmental path. In mammals, insights into the
role of key transcription factors that control development of highly specialized organs
like the pancreas were derived from experiments in mice, especially various genetically
modified animals1234. Normal development of the pancreas requires
the activation of pancreatic duodenal homeobox protein (Pdx1) in pre-patterned cells of
the endoderm. Inactivating mutations of Pdx1 are associated with pancreas
agenesis in mouse and humans56. A similar cell fate decision occurs
later with the activation of Ngn3 that is required for the development of all endocrine
cells in the pancreas7. Absence of Ngn3 is associated with the loss of
pancreatic endocrine cells, whereas the activation of Ngn3 not only allows the
differentiation of endocrine cells but also induces lateral inhibition of neighbouring
cells—via Delta-Notch pathway—to enter the same pancreatic endocrine cell
fate8. This Ngn3-mediated cell-switch occurs at a specific time point
and for a short period of time in mice9. Thereafter, it is silenced and
becomes almost undetectable in postnatal pancreatic islets. Conversely, Pdx1-positive
Ngn3-positive cells reduce Pdx1 expression, as Ngn3-positive cells are Pdx1
negative10. They re-express Pdx1, however, as they go on their path
towards glucose-sensitive insulin-secreting cells with parallel induction of MafA that
is required for proper differentiation and maturation of pancreatic beta cells11. Data supporting these expression dynamics are derived from mice
experiments11112. A synthetic gene-switch governing cell fate
decision in human induced pluripotent stem cells (hIPSCs) could facilitate the
differentiation of glucose-sensitive insulin-secreting cells.In recent years, synthetic biology has significantly advanced the rational design of
synthetic gene networks that can interface with host metabolism, correct physiological
disturbances13 and provide treatment strategies for a variety of
metabolic disorders, including gouty arthritis14, obesity15 and type-2 diabetes16. Currently, synthetic biology principles may
provide the componentry and gene network topologies for the assembly of synthetic
lineage-control networks that can programme cell-fate decisions and provide targeted
differentiation of stem cells into terminally differentiated somatic cells. Synthetic
lineage-control networks may therefore provide the missing link between human
pluripotent stem cells17 and their true impact on regenerative
medicine181920. The use of autologous stem cells in regenerative
medicine holds great promise for curing many diseases, including type-1 diabetes
mellitus (T1DM), which is characterized by the autoimmune destruction of
insulin-producing pancreatic beta cells, thus making patients dependent on exogenous
insulin to control their blood glucose2122. Although insulin therapy
has changed the prospects and survival of T1DM patients, these patients still suffer
from diabetic complications arising from the lack of physiological insulin secretion and
excessive glucose levels23. The replacement of the pancreatic beta cells
either by pancreas transplantation or by transplantation of pancreatic islets has been
shown to normalize blood glucose and even improve existing complications of
diabetes24. However, insulin independence 5 years after islet
transplantation can only be achieved in up to 55% of the patients even when using
the latest generation of immune suppression strategies2526.
Transplantation of human islets or the entire pancreas has allowed T1DM patients to
become somewhat insulin independent, which provides a proof-of-concept for beta-cell
replacement therapies2728. However, because of the shortage of donor
pancreases and islets, as well as the significant risk associated with transplantation
and life-long immunosuppression, the rational differentiation of stem cells into
functional beta-cells remains an attractive alternative2930.
Nevertheless, a definitive cure for T1DM should address both the beta-cell deficit and
the autoimmune response to cells that express insulin. Any beta-cell mimetic should be
able to store large amounts of insulin and secrete it on demand, as in response to
glucose stimulation2931. The most effective protocols for the in
vitro generation of bonafide insulin-secreting beta-like cells that are
suitable for transplantation have been the result of sophisticated trial-and-error
studies elaborating timely addition of complex growth factor and small-molecule compound
cocktails to human pancreatic progenitor cells323334. The
differentiation of pancreatic progenitor cells to beta-like cells is the most
challenging part as current protocols provide inconsistent results and limited success
in programming pancreatic progenitor cells into glucose-sensitive insulin-secreting
beta-like cells353637. One of the reasons for these observations
could be the heterogeneity in endocrine differentiation and maturation towards a beta
cell phenotype. Here we show that a synthetic lineage-control network programming the
dynamic expression of the transcription factors Ngn3, Pdx1 and MafA enables the
differentiation of hIPSC-derived pancreatic progenitor cells to glucose-sensitive
insulin-secreting beta-like cells (Supplementary
Fig. 1).
The differentiation pathway from pancreatic progenitor cells to glucose-sensitive
insulin-secreting pancreatic beta-cells combines the transient mutually
exclusive expression switches of Ngn3 (OFF-ON-OFF) and Pdx1 (ON-OFF-ON) with the
concomitant induction of MafA (OFF-ON) expression1011. Since
independent control of the pancreatic transcription factors Ngn3, Pdx1 and MafA
by different antibiotic transgene control systems responsive to tetracycline,
erythromycin and pristinamycin did not result in the desired differential
control dynamics (Supplementary Fig.
2), we have designed a vanillic acid-programmable synthetic
lineage-control network that programmes hIPSC-derived pancreatic progenitor
cells to specifically differentiate into glucose-sensitive insulin-secreting
beta-like cells in a seamless and self-sufficient manner. The timely
coordination of mutually exclusive Ngn3 and Pdx1 expression with MafA induction
requires the trigger-controlled execution of a complex genetic programme that
orchestrates two overlapping antagonistic band-pass filter expression profiles
(OFF-ON-OFF and ON-OFF-ON), a positive band-pass filter for Ngn3 (OFF-ON-OFF)
and a negative band-pass filter, also known as band-stop filter, for Pdx1
(ON-OFF-ON), the ramp-up expression phase of which is linked to a graded
induction of MafA (OFF-ON).The core of the synthetic lineage-control network consists of two transgene
control devices that are sensitive to the food component and licensed food
additive vanillic acid. These devices are a synthetic vanillic acid-inducible
(ON-type) signalling cascade that is gradually induced by increasing the
vanillic acid concentration and a vanillic acid-repressible (OFF-type) gene
switch that is repressed in a vanillic acid dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1a,b). The designer cascade consists of the vanillic
acid-sensitive mammalian olfactory receptor MOR9-1, which sequentially activates
the G protein Sα (GSα) and adenylyl cyclase to produce a
cyclic AMP (cAMP) second messenger surge38 that is rewired via
the cAMP-responsive protein kinase A-mediated phospho-activation of the
cAMP-response element-binding protein 1 (CREB1) to the induction of synthetic
promoters (PCRE) containing CREB1-specific cAMP response elements
(CRE; Fig. 1a). The co-transfection of pCI-MOR9-1
(PhCMV-MOR9-1-pASV40) and pCK53
(PCRE-SEAP-pASV40) into human mesenchymal stem cells
(hMSC-TERT) confirmed the vanillic acid-adjustable secreted alkaline phosphatase
(SEAP) induction of the designer cascade (>10 nM vanillic acid; Fig. 1a). The vanillic acid-repressible gene switch consists
of the vanillic acid-dependent transactivator (VanA1), which binds
and activates vanillic acid-responsive promoters (for example,
P1VanO2) at low and medium vanillic acid levels
(<2 μM). At high vanillic acid concentrations
(>2 μM), VanA1 dissociates from P1VanO2,
which results in the dose-dependent repression of transgene expression39 (Fig. 1b). The co-transfection of
pMG250 (PSV40-VanA1-pASV40) and
pMG252 (P1VanO2-SEAP-pASV40) into hMSC-TERT
corroborated the fine-tuning of the vanillic acid-repressible SEAP expression
(Fig. 1b).
Figure 1
Design of a vanillic acid-responsive positive band-pass filter providing an
OFF-ON-OFF expression profile.
(a) Vanillic acid-inducible transgene expression. The constitutively
expressed vanillic acid-sensitive olfactory G protein-coupled receptor
MOR9-1 (pCI-MOR9-1; PhCMV-MOR9-1-pA) senses extracellular
vanillic acid levels and triggers G protein (Gs)-mediated
activation of the membrane-bound adenylyl cyclase (AC) that converts ATP
into cyclic AMP (cAMP). The resulting intracellular cAMP surge activates PKA
(protein kinase A), whose catalytic subunits translocate into the nucleus to
phosphorylate cAMP response element-binding protein 1 (CREB1). Activated
CREB1 binds to synthetic promoters (PCRE) containing
cAMP-response elements (CRE) and induces PCRE-driven expression
of human placental secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP; pCK53,
PCRE-SEAP-pA). Co-transfection of pCI-MOR9-1 and pCK53 into
human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC-TERT) grown for 48 h in the
presence of increasing vanillic acid concentrations results in a
dose-inducible SEAP expression profile. (b) Vanillic acid-repressible
transgene expression. The constitutively expressed, vanillic acid-dependent
transactivator VanA1 (pMG250,
PSV40-VanA1-pA, VanA1, VanR-VP16) binds and
activates the chimeric promoter P1VanO2 (pMG252,
P1VanO2-SEAP-pA) in the absence of vanillic acid. In the
presence of increasing vanillic acid concentrations, VanA1 is
released from P1VanO2, and transgene expression is shut down.
Co-transfection of pMG250 and pMG252 into hMSC-TERT grown for 48 h in
the presence of increasing vanillic acid concentrations results in a
dose-repressible SEAP expression profile. (c) Positive band-pass
expression filter. Serial interconnection of the synthetic vanillic
acid-inducible signalling cascade (a) with the vanillic
acid-repressible transcription factor-based gene switch (b) by
PCRE-mediated expression of VanA1 (pSP1,
PCRE-VanA1-pA) results in a two-level feed-forward
cascade. Owing to the opposing responsiveness and differential sensitivity
to vanillic acid, this synthetic gene network programmes SEAP expression
with a positive band-pass filter profile (OFF-ON-OFF) as vanillic acid
levels are increased. Medium vanillic acid levels activate MOR9-1, which
induces PCRE-driven VanA1 expression. VanA1
remains active and triggers P1VanO2-mediated SEAP expression in
feed-forward manner, which increases to maximum levels. At high vanillic
acid concentrations, MOR9-1 maintains PCRE-driven
VanA1 expression, but the transactivator dissociates from
P1VanO2, which shuts SEAP expression down. Co-transfection of
pCI-MOR9-1, pSP1 and pMG252 into hMSC-TERT grown for 48 h in the
presence of increasing vanillic acid concentrations programmes SEAP
expression with a positive band-pass profile (OFF-ON-OFF). Data are the
means±s.d. of triplicate experiments (n=9).
The opposing responsiveness and differential sensitivity of the control devices
to vanillic acid are essential to programme band-pass filter expression
profiles. Upon daisy-chaining the designer cascade (pCI-MOR9-1;
PhCMV-MOR9-1-pASV40; pSP1,
PCRE-VanA1-pASV40) and the gene switch
(pSP1, PCRE-VanA1-pASV40;
pMG252, P1VanO2-SEAP-pASV40) in the same cell,
the network executes a band-pass filter SEAP expression profile when exposed to
increasing concentrations of vanillic acid (Fig. 1c).
Medium vanillic acid levels (10 nM to 2 μM) activate
MOR9-1, which induces PCRE-driven VanA1 expression.
VanA1 remains active within this concentration range and, in a
feed-forward amplifier manner, triggers P1VanO2-mediated SEAP
expression, which gradually increases to maximum levels (Fig.
1c). At high vanillic acid concentrations (2 μM to
400 μM), MOR9-1 maintains PCRE-driven VanA1
expression, but the transactivator is inactivated and dissociates from
P1VanO2, which results in the gradual shutdown of SEAP expression
(Fig. 1c).
For the design of the vanillic acid-programmable synthetic lineage-control
network, constitutive MOR9-1 expression and PCRE-driven
VanA1 expression were combined with pSP12
(pASV40-Ngn3cm←P3VanO2→mFT-miR30Pdx1g-shRNA-pASV40)
for endocrine specification and pSP17
(PCREm-Pdx1cm-2A-MafAcm-pASV40)
for maturation of developing beta-cells (Fig. 2a,b). The
pSP12-encoded expression unit enables the VanA1-controlled
induction of the optimized bidirectional vanillic acid-responsive promoter
(P3VanO2) that drives expression of a codon-modified
Ngn3, the nucleic acid sequence of which is
distinct from its genomic counterpart (Ngn3) to allow
for quantitative reverse transcription–PCR (qRT–PCR)-based
discrimination. In the opposite direction, P3VanO2 transcribes
miR30Pdx1g-shRNA, which exclusively targets genomic Pdx1
(Pdx1) transcripts for RNA interference-based
destruction and is linked to the production of a blue-to-red medium fluorescent
timer40 (mFT) for precise visualization of the unit's
expression dynamics in situ.
pSP17 contains a dicistronic expression unit in which the modified
high-tightness and lower-sensitivity PCREm promoter (see below)
drives co-cistronic expression of Pdx1 and
MafA, which are codon-modified versions producing
native transcription factors that specifically differ from their genomic
counterparts (Pdx1, MafA) in
their nucleic acid sequence. After individual validation of the vanillic
acid-controlled expression and functionality of all network components (Supplementary Figs 2–9), the
lineage-control network was ready to be transfected into hIPSC-derived
pancreatic progenitor cells. These cells are characterized by high expression of
Pdx1g and Nkx6.1 levels and the absence of Ngn3g and
MafAg production323334 (day 0: Supplementary Figs 10–16).
(a) Schematic of the synthetic lineage-control network. The
constitutively expressed, vanillic acid-sensitive olfactory G
protein-coupled receptor MOR9-1 (pCI-MOR9-1; PhCMV-MOR9-1-pA)
senses extracellular vanillic acid levels and triggers a synthetic
signalling cascade, inducing PCRE-driven expression of the
transcription factor VanA1 (pSP1,
PCRE-VanA1-pA). At medium vanillic acid
concentrations (purple arrows), VanA1 binds and activates the
bidirectional vanillic acid-responsive promoter P3VanO2 (pSP12,
pA-Ngn3cm←P3VanO2→mFT-miR30Pdx1g-shRNA-pA),
which drives the induction of codon-modified Neurogenin 3
(Ngn3) as well as the coexpression of
both the blue-to-red medium fluorescent timer (mFT) for precise
visualization of the unit's expression dynamics and
miR30pdx1g-shRNA (a small hairpin RNA programming the
exclusive destruction of genomic pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1
(Pdx1) transcripts). Consequently,
Ngn3cm levels switch from low to high (OFF-to-ON), and
Pdx1g levels toggle from high to low (ON-to-OFF). In
addition, Ngn3cm triggers the transcription of
Ngn3 from its genomic promoter, which
initiates a positive-feedback loop. At high vanillic acid levels (orange
arrows), VanA1 is inactivated, and both
Ngn3 and miR30pdx1g-shRNA are shut
down. At the same time, the MOR9-1-driven signalling cascade induces the
modified high-tightness and lower-sensitivity PCREm promoter that
drives the co-cistronic expression of the codon-modified variants of
Pdx1 (Pdx1) and V-maf
musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homologue A
(MafA; pSP17,
PCREm-Pdx1cm-2A-MafAcm-pA).
Consequently, Pdx1cm and MafAcm become fully induced.
As Pdx1cm expression ramps up, it initiates a positive-feedback
loop by inducing the genomic counterparts Pdx1 and
MafA. Importantly,
Pdx1 levels are not affected by
miR30Pdx1g-shRNA because the latter is specific for genomic
Pdx1 transcripts and because the positive
feedback loop-mediated amplification of Pdx1g expression becomes
active only after the shutdown of miR30Pdx1g-shRNA. Overall, the
synthetic lineage-control network provides vanillic acid-programmable,
transient, mutually exclusive expression switches for Ngn3 (OFF-ON-OFF) and
Pdx1 (ON-OFF-ON) as well as the concomitant induction of MafA (OFF-ON)
expression, which can be followed in real time (Supplementary Movies 1 and 2).
(b) Schematic illustrating the individual differentiation steps from
human IPSCs towards beta-like cells. The colours match the cell phenotypes
reached during the individual differentiation stages programmed by the
lineage-control network shown in a.
Following the co-transfection of pCI-MOR9-1
(PhCMV-MOR9-1-pASV40), pSP1
(PCRE-VanA1-pASV40), pSP12
(pASV40-Ngn3cm←P3VanO2→mFT-miR30Pdx1g-shRNA-pASV40)
and pSP17
(P-Pdx1cm-2A-MafAcm-pASV40)
into hIPSC-derived pancreatic progenitor cells, the synthetic lineage-control
network should override random endogenous differentiation activities and execute
the pancreatic beta-cell-specific differentiation programme in a vanillic acid
remote-controlled manner. To confirm that the lineage-control network operates
as programmed, we cultivated network-containing and pEGFP-N1-transfected
(negative-control) cells for 4 days at medium (2 μM) and then 7
days at high (400 μM) vanillic acid concentrations and profiled
the differential expression dynamics of all of the network components and their
genomic counterparts as well as the interrelated transcription factors and
hormones in both whole populations and individual cells at days 0, 4, 11 and 14
(Figs 2 and 3 and Supplementary Figs 11–17).
Figure 3
Dynamics of the lineage-control network.
(a,b) Quantitative RT–PCR-based expression profiling of
the pancreatic transcription factors Ngn3,
Pdx1 and MafA
in hIPSC-derived pancreatic progenitor cells containing the synthetic
lineage-control network at days 4 and 11. Data are the means±s.d. of
triplicate experiments (n=9). (c–g)
Immunocytochemistry of pancreatic transcription factors Ngn3cm/g,
Pdx1cm/g and MafAcm/g in hIPSC-derived pancreatic
progenitor cells containing the synthetic lineage-control network at days 4
and 11. hIPSC-derived pancreatic progenitor cells were co-transfected with
the lineage-control vectors pCI-MOR9-1 (PhCMV-MOR9-1-pA), pSP1
(PCRE-VanA1-pA), pSP12
(pA-Ngn3cm←P3VanO2→mFT-miR30Pdx1g-shRNA-pA)
and pSP17 (PCREm-Pdx1cm-2A-MafAcm) and
immunocytochemically stained for (c) VanA1 and Pdx1 (day
4), (d) VanA1 and Ngn3 (day 4), (e)
VanA1 and Pdx1 (day 11), (f) MafA and Pdx1 (day 11) as
well as (g) VanA1 and insulin (C-peptide) (day 11). The
cells staining positive for VanA1 are containing the
lineage-control network. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Scale
bar, 100 μm.
Validation of the lineage-control dynamics
The aforementioned detailed analysis demonstrated that the following three
expression protocols were simultaneously executed:Positive band-pass Ngn3 expression profile (OFF-ON-OFF): medium vanillic acid
concentrations trigger the MOR9-1-based designer cascade and induce
PCRE-driven VanA1 expression. Because VanA1
remains fully active at medium vanillic acid levels, it transactivates the
bidirectional promoter P3VanO2 and induces Ngn3cm
expression (Fig. 3a). Ngn3cm triggers the
transcription of Ngn3g from its genomic promoter, which
initiates a positive-feedback loop8, resulting in high-level
expression of Ngn3g (OFF-ON; Fig. 3a–d
and Supplementary Fig. 17) as well
as its target genes Pax4 (paired box gene 4) and the notch-signalling
components Hes1 (hairy and enhancer of split-1) and Dll1
(delta-like 1), which manage lateral inhibition (a developmental pathway
suppressing similar differentiation of neighbouring cells841;
day 4; Supplementary Fig. 17).
NeuroD1 (neurogenic differentiation factor 1) expression levels in
network-transfected cells remained identical to randomly differentiating cells
(days 4; Supplementary Fig. 17).
After switching the cells to high vanillic acid concentrations, VanA1
was released from P3VanO2 and Ngn3cm, and Ngn3g
expression halted, which resulted in an overall decrease of this transcription
factor (ON-OFF; day 11; Fig. 3a,b).Negative band-pass/band-stop filter Pdx1 expression profile (ON-OFF-ON):
Following the MOR9-1-mediated activation of PCRE-driven
VanA1 expression at medium vanillic acid concentrations,
VanA1 co-induces the P3VanO2-driven expression of
Ngn3cm and miR30Pdx1g-shRNA. As Ngn3cm and
miR30Pdx1g-shRNA levels increase, miR30Pdx1g-shRNA
programmes the exclusive destruction of genomic Pdx1
(Pdx1) transcripts, which results in a
reduction of Pdx1g levels (ON-OFF; Fig. 3b).
Because PCREm-driven
Pdx1-2A-MafA
transcription is silent at medium vanillic acid concentrations, the overall
cellular Pdx1cm/g content remains low (day 4; Fig.
3a–c). At high vanillic acid concentrations, where
VanA1 is inactivated and P3VanO2-driven
miR30Pdx1g-shRNA expression is shut down,
PCREm-mediated Pdx1cm expression ramps up and initiates a
positive-feedback loop by inducing Pdx142 as well MafA43 (see below) from
their genomic promoters, which results in sustained high-level Pdx1g
and MafAg expression (OFF-ON; day 11; Fig.
3b,e–g). Importantly, Pdx1 levels
are not affected by miR30Pdx1g-shRNA, as it is specific for genomic
Pdx1 transcripts, and the positive-feedback
loop-mediated amplification of Pdx1 expression becomes
active only after the shutdown of miR30Pdx1g-shRNA (Supplementary Fig. 18). The transition
between miR30Pdx1g-shRNA-mediated knockdown and
PCREm-driven Pdx1cm ramp-up requires a time delay in the
production of both components that results from the combination of the higher
vanillic acid sensitivity and induction kinetics of PCRE compared
with PCREm (Supplementary
Fig. 7; see below) and the fact that miR30Pdx1g-shRNA is
driven by a two-level cascade (PCRE inducing VanA1;
VanA1 activating P3VanO2), which then leads to
feed-forward loop-type signal amplification and increased expression kinetics of
miR30Pdx1g-shRNA compared with Pdx1cm (Supplementary Fig. 18). The time delay and
correlating expression dynamics of Ngn3cm,
miR30Pdx1g-shRNA and Pdx1cm can be visualized in real
time because miR30Pdx1g-shRNA is linked to the expression of the
blue-to-red mFT 40 and because the PCREm-mediated
dicistronic expression of
Pdx1-2A-MafA can
be linked to an isogenic PCREm-driven enhanced yellow fluorescent
protein (EYFP) expression plug-in (pSP24;
PCREm-EYFP-pASV40). During the co-induction of
Ngn3cm and miR30Pdx1g-shRNA as well as
miR30Pdx1g-shRNA-mediated Pdx1
knockdown at medium vanillic acid concentrations, the cells first fluoresce in
blue and then simultaneously in blue and red as the mFT matures (Supplementary Movie 1). After switching the
culture to high vanillic acid and repressing P3VanO2-driven
Ngn3cm, miR30Pdx1g-shRNA and mFT de novo
synthesis, all cells contain fully matured mFT and exclusively fluoresce in red
(Supplementary Movie 2). After
the transition to PCREm-mediated Pdx1cm and
MafAcm production, the cells express EYFP and fluoresce in yellow
(Supplementary Movie 2).MafA induction profile (OFF-ON): Because PCREm has been optimized for
tightness and decreased vanillic acid sensitivity44,
MafAcm is repressed at medium vanillic acid concentrations, as is
required for the early phase of the differentiation process45
when Ngn3cm is induced and Pdx1g is repressed (day 4;
Fig. 3a,b). At high vanillic acid levels,
MafA is co-cistronically expressed with
Pdx1 by PCREm; therefore, the
time-delayed production onset of MafAcm matches that of
Pdx1cm (OFF-ON; Fig. 3a,b).
MafAcm triggers a positive-feedback loop by activating
Pdx1 expression46 from its genomic
promoter, which results in sustained high-level MafAg and
Pdx1g expression that compensates for the initial lower-level
induction by PCREm (day 11; Fig.
3a,b,e–g).
Validation of beta-like cells programmed by the network
To validate the beta-like cells genetically programmed from hIPSC-derived
pancreatic progenitor cells using the synthetic lineage-control network, we
compared their phenotype to cells produced using the
growth-factor/chemical-based differentiation technique (Supplementary Figs 1 and 19) as well as to
human pancreatic islets. Following individual execution of the two
differentiation programmes (synthetic lineage-control network and
growth-factor/chemical-based protocol; day 11), insulin-secreting beta-like
cells were isolated by flow cytometry and profiled by quantitative RT–PCR
for the expression levels of key beta-cell-specific markers relative to human
pancreatic islets323334474849 (Fig.
4).
Figure 4
Gene expression profiling of beta-like cells programmed by the synthetic
lineage-control network.
Quantitative RT–PCR-based expression profiling of the following genes
in glucose-sensitive insulin-secreting beta-like cells differentiated by the
lineage-control network: (a) the key pancreatic beta-cell-specific
transcription factors Glis3, MafA, MafB, Mnx1, NeuroD, Pax4, Pdx1 and
Nkx6.1, (b) the glucose- and insulin-processing factors
Gck, Glut2, G6pc2, Pcsk1, Pcsk2, Slc30a8, Snap25, Stx1A, Stxbp1,
Syt4, (c) the channels essential for the secretion of insulin
such as Abcc8, Cacna1D, Kcnk1/3 and Kcnj11 and (d) the
human islet peptide hormones Chgb, Ghrelin, Glucagon, Iapp, Insulin
and Somatostatin, and (e) immature as well as mature human
pancreatic beta-cell markers Acox2, Ck19, Dpp4, FoxA1, Fzd2, Gcgr, Irx2,
Mmp2, Onecut2, Sftpd and Ucn3. The transcript levels were
profiled at day 11 relative to hIPSCs and normalized to glyceraldehyde
3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Data are the means±s.d. of
triplicate experiments (n=9). Abcc8, ATP-binding cassette
transporter sub-family C member 8; Acox2, Acyl-CoA oxidase 2; Cacna1D,
voltage-dependent, L-type alpha 1D subunit; Chgb, chromogranin B; Ck19,
cytokeratin-19; Dpp4, dipeptidyl-peptidase 4; FoxA1, forkhead box protein
A1; Fzd2, frizzled 2; Gcgr, glucagon receptor; Gck, glucokinase; Glis3, glis
family zinc finger 3; Glut2, glucose transporter 2; G6pc2,
glucose-6-phosphatase 2; Iapp, islet amyloid polypeptide; Irx2, iroquois
homeobox 2; Kcnk1/3, potassium channel, subfamily K, member 1/3; Kcnj11,
potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 11; MafA/B, V-maf
musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homologue A/B; Mmp2, matrix
metalloproteinase 2; Mnx1, motor neuron and pancreas homeobox 1; NeuroD1,
neurogenic differentiation factor 1; Nkx6.1, NK6 homeobox 1; Onecut2, onecut
homeobox 2; Pax4, paired box gene 4; Pcsk1/2, proprotein convertase 1/2;
Sftpd, surfactant protein D; Pdx1, pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1;
Slc30a8, solute carrier family 30, member 8; Snap25, synaptosomal-associated
protein; Stx1A (Syntaxin-1A), Stxbp1, syntaxin binding protein 1; Syt4
synaptotagmin-4; Ucn3, urocortin 3.
Compared with human pancreatic islets, the beta-like cells produced by the
synthetic lineage-control programme showed similar levels of (i) the
transcription factors MafA, NeuroD, Pax4 and Pdx1,
whereas NeuroD, Pax4 and Pdx1 were expressed at lower
levels in beta-like cells produced by the growth-factor/chemical-based
differentiation technique (Fig. 4a). (ii) Likewise, the
glucose-processing factors such as Gck (glucokinase) and G6pc2
(glucose-6-phosphatase 2) as well as the insulin-processing factor Pcsk1
(prohormone convertase 1) were expressed at higher levels in beta-like cells
produced using the lineage-control network compared with those resulting from
the growth-factor/chemical-based differentiation technique (Fig.
4b). (iii) The expression levels of channels essential for the
secretion of insulin were comparable between beta-like cells produced by either
differentiation strategy (Fig. 4c). (iv) Insulin
expression was much higher in lineage-controlled than
growth-factor/chemical-differentiated beta-like cells. Yet, insulin
expression of lineage-controlled beta-like cells was not quite reaching the
levels of human pancreatic islets (Fig. 4d). The
expression of somatostatin and glucagon was substantially lower in
lineage-controlled than growth-factor/chemical-differentiated beta-like cells
(Fig. 4d). (v) Markers specific for immature
beta-cells such as Ck19 (Cytokeratin 19), Irx2 (Iroquois homeobox
2) and Acox2 (Acyl-CoA oxidase 2) were expressed at lower levels, whereas
markers specific for mature beta-cells such as FoxA1 (Forkhead box A1
(ref. 50) and Gcgr (Glucagon receptor) were
expressed at a higher levels in lineage- than growth-factor/chemical-controlled
beta-like cells (Fig. 4e). (vi) Flow-cytometric analysis
of insulin (C-peptide), glucagon and somatostatin revealed that most
lineage-controlled beta-like cells stained positive for the lineage-control
network component VanA1 as well as insulin (C-peptide), whereas only
very few VanA1-containing cells co-stained for glucagon and
somatostatin (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 20a). These data
confirmed that over 75% of the hIPSC-derived pancreatic progenitors
transfected with the synthetic lineage-control network indeed differentiated
into glucose-sensitive insulin-secreting beta-like cells (Fig.
5a and Supplementary Fig.
20a). By contrast, the growth-factor/chemical-based differentiation
technique only produced 26% of insulin-secreting beta-like cells (Supplementary Fig. 20b,c). (vii) In
addition, the intracellular insulin (C-peptide) content was substantially higher
in lineage-controlled beta-like cells compared with those resulting from the
growth-factor/chemical-based differentiation technique, albeit lower than in
human pancreatic islets (Fig. 5b). (viii) Most
importantly, the dynamics of glucose-stimulated insulin release of
lineage-controlled beta-like cells was similar to that of human pancreatic
islets, whereas beta-like cells differentiated by the growth
factor/chemical-based differentiation technique showed poor glucose-stimulated
insulin release (Fig. 5c). In addition, the
lineage-controlled beta-like cells maintained glucose-stimulated insulin release
during extended culture periods of up to 4 weeks (Fig.
5d).
Figure 5
Characterization of glucose-sensitive insulin-secreting beta-like cells
programmed by the synthetic lineage-control network.
(a) Quantitative analysis of lineage-controlled beta-like cells
co-stained for VanA1 and either insulin (C-peptide), glucagon or
somatostatin. The cells staining positive for VanA1 are
containing the lineage-control network. Data are the means±s.d.
(n=3). (b,c) Human pancreatic islets and
beta-like cells produced by programming hIPSC-derived pancreatic progenitor
cells using the synthetic lineage-control network or the
growth-factor/chemical-based differentiation technique were exposed to low
(2.8 mM), medium (10 mM), high (20 mM) glucose as well
as high glucose and potassium chloride (30 mM) before intracellular
(b) and secreted (c) insulin (C-peptide) levels were
profiled using ELISA. Data are the means±s.d. of duplicate
experiments (n=6). Statistics by Student's
t-test; *P<0.05, **P<0.005,
****P<0.0001; ns, not significant. (d)
Beta-like cells produced by programming hIPSC-derived pancreatic progenitor
cells using the synthetic lineage-control network or the
growth-factor/chemical-based differentiation technique and cultivated for 4
weeks were exposed to low (2.8 mM), medium (10 mM), high
(20 mM) glucose as well as high glucose and potassium chloride
(30 mM) before secreted insulin (C-peptide) levels were profiled
using ELISA. Data are the means±s.d. of duplicate experiments
(n=6). Statistics by Student's t-test;
**P<0.005; ns, not significant. (e)
Transmission-electron micrographs of human pancreatic islets and
lineage-controlled beta-like cells. Scale bars, 1 μm (human
pancreatic islets) and 2 μm (beta-like cells differentiated by
the synthetic lineage-control network).
Overall, all of these characteristics corroborate our finding that the synthetic
lineage-control network is able to programme the cell fate of hIPSC-derived
pancreatic progenitor cells and specifically differentiate them into
glucose-sensitive insulin-secreting pancreatic beta-like cells. Indeed, electron
micrographs of these lineage-controlled beta-like cells show the typical
insulin-storage vesicles that are found in mature pancreatic beta cells (Fig. 5e).
Discussion
Multicellular organisms, including humans, consist of a highly structured assembly of
a multitude of specialized cell phenotypes that originate from the same zygote and
have traversed a preprogrammed multifactorial developmental plan that orchestrates
sequential differentiation steps with high precision in space and time1951. Because of the complexity of terminally differentiated cells,
the function of damaged tissues can for most medical indications only be restored
via the transplantation of donor material, which is in chronically short supply52.Despite significant progress in regenerative medicine and the availability of stem
cells, the design of protocols that replicate natural differentiation programmes and
provide fully functional cell mimetics remains challenging2953. For
example, efforts to generate beta-cells from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) have
led to reliable protocols involving the sequential administration of growth factors
(activin A, bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4), basic fibroblast growth factor
(bFGF), FGF-10, Noggin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Wnt3A) and
small-molecule compounds (cyclopamine, forskolin, indolactam V, IDE1, IDE2,
nicotinamide, retinoic acid, SB−431542 and γ-secretase inhibitor) that
modulate differentiation-specific signalling pathways315455.
In vitro differentiation of hESC-derived pancreatic progenitor cells into
beta-like cells is more challenging and has been achieved recently by a complex
media formulation with chemicals and growth factors323334.hIPSCs have become a promising alternative to hESCs; however, their use remains
restricted in many countries56. Most hIPSCs used for directed
differentiation studies were derived from a juvenescent cell source that is expected
to show a higher degree of differentiation potential compared with older donors that
typically have a higher need for medical interventions375758. We
previously succeeded in producing mRNA-reprogrammed hIPSCs from adipose
tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells of a 50-year-old donor, demonstrating that the
reprogramming of cells from a donor of advanced age is possible in principle59.Recent studies applying similar hESC-based differentiation protocols to hIPSCs have
produced cells that release insulin in response to high glucose323334. This observation suggests that functional beta-like cells
can eventually be derived from hIPSCs3233. In our hands, the
growth-factor/chemical-based technique for differentiating human IPSCs resulted in
beta-like cells with poor glucose responsiveness. Recent studies have revealed
significant variability in the lineage specification propensity of different hIPSC
lines3560 and substantial differences in the expression
profiles of key transcription factors in hIPSC-derived beta-like cells33. Therefore, the growth-factor/chemical-based protocols may require
further optimization and need to be customized for specific hIPSC lines35. Synthetic lineage-control networks providing precise dynamic
control of transcription factor expression may overcome the challenges associated
with the programming of beta-like cells from different hIPSC lines.Rather than exposing hIPSCs to a refined compound cocktail that triggers the desired
differentiation in a fraction of the stem cell population, we chose to design a
synthetic lineage-control network to enable single input-programmable
differentiation of hIPSC-derived pancreatic progenitor cells into glucose-sensitive
insulin-secreting beta-like cells. In contrast with the use of
growth-factor/chemical-based cocktails, synthetic lineage-control networks are
expected to (i) be more economical because of in situ production of the
required transcription factors, (ii) enable simultaneous control of ectopic and
chromosomally encoded transcription factor variants, (iii) tap into endogenous
pathways and not be limited to cell-surface input, (iv) display improved
reversibility that is not dependent on the removal of exogenous growth factors via
culture media replacement, (v) provide lateral inhibition, thereby reducing the
random differentiation of neighbouring cells and (vi) enable trigger-programmable
and (vii) precise differential transcription factor expression switches.The synthetic lineage-control network that precisely replicates the endogenous
relative expression dynamics of the transcription factors Pdx-1, Ngn3 and MafA
required the design of a new network topology that interconnects a synthetic
signalling cascade and a gene switch with differential and opposing sensitivity to
the food additive vanillic acid. This differentiation device provides different
band-pass filter, time-delay and feed-forward amplifier topologies that interface
with endogenous positive-feedback loops to orchestrate the timely expression and
repression of heterologous and chromosomally encoded Ngn3, Pdx1 and MafA variants.
The temporary nature of the engineering intervention, which consists of transient
transfection of the genetic lineage-control components in the absence of any
selection, is expected to avoid stable modification of host chromosomes and
alleviate potential safety concerns. In addition, the resulting beta-cell mass could
be encapsulated inside vascularized microcontainers28, a proven
containment strategy in prototypic cell-based therapies currently being tested in
animal models of prominent human diseases1415166162 as well
as in human clinical trials28.The hIPSC-derived beta-like cells resulting from this trigger-induced synthetic
lineage-control network exhibited glucose-stimulated insulin-release dynamics and
capacity matching the human physiological range and transcriptional profiling, flow
cytometric analysis and electron microscopy corroborated the lineage-controlled stem
cells reached a mature beta-cell phenotype. In principle, the combination of hIPSCs
derived from the adipose tissue of a 50-year-old donor59 with a
synthetic lineage-control network programming glucose-sensitive insulin-secreting
beta-like cells closes the design cycle of regenerative medicine63.
However, hIPSCs that are derived from T1DM patients, differentiated into beta-like
cells and transplanted back into the donor would still be targeted by the immune
system, as demonstrated in the transplantation of segmental pancreatic grafts from
identical twins64. Therefore, any beta-cell-replacement therapy will
require complementary modulation of the immune system either via drugs3065, engineering or cell-based approaches6667 or
packaging inside vascularizing, semi-permeable immunoprotective microcontainers28.Capitalizing on the design principles of synthetic biology, we have successfully
constructed and validated a synthetic lineage-control network that replicates the
differential expression dynamics of critical transcription factors and mimicks the
native differentiation pathway to programme hIPSC-derived pancreatic progenitor
cells into glucose-sensitive insulin-secreting beta-like cells that compare with
human pancreatic islets at a high level. The design of input-triggered synthetic
lineage-control networks that execute a preprogrammed sequential differentiation
agenda coordinating the timely induction and repression of multiple genes could
provide a new impetus for the advancement of developmental biology and regenerative
medicine.
Methods
Network components
Comprehensive design and construction details for all expression vectors are
provided in Supplementary Table 1.
Key plasmids are as follows: pCI-MOR encodes
constitutively expressed vanillic acid receptor (MOR9-1;
PhCMV-MOR9-1-pASV40); pSP1 encodes
cAMP-responsive expression cassette for the vanillic acid-dependent
transactivator (VanA1;
PCRE-VanA1-pASV40); pSP12 contains a
vanillic acid-responsive Ngn3cm, mFT and miR30Pdx1g-shRNA
expression unit
(pASV40←Ngn3cm-P3VanO2→mFT-miR30Pdx1g-shRNA-pASV40)
and pSP17 contains a cAMP-responsive dicistronic Pdx1cm and
MafAcm expression unit
(PCREm-Pdx1cm-2A-MafAcm-pASV40).
Cell culture and transfection
Human mesenchymal stem cells transgenic for the catalytic subunit of human
telomerase (hMSC-TERT68) were cultivated in DMEM (Invitrogen)
supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) fetal calf serum (FCS; lot no. PE01026P,
Bioconcept) and 1% (vol/vol) penicillin/streptomycin solution
(Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing
5% CO2. The hIPSCs were derived from the adipose tissue of a
50-year-old donor59. The hIPSCs were cultivated in Geltrex-coated
12-well culture plates (Invitrogen) containing 1 ml mTeSR1 medium
(STEMCELL Technologies). For serial passage, the colonies were enzymatically
dissociated into cellular clumps (200–400 cells per clump) using
1 U ml−1 dispase (STEMCELL Technologies).
For the transfection of hMSC-TERT, 2 × 105 cells were
seeded per well on a six-well plate 12 h before transfection and
incubated for 24 h with 400 μl of a DNA-polyethyleneimine
(PEI) mixture that was produced by incubating 6 μl PEI (PEI,
<20,000 MW, Polysciences; stock solution:
1 mg ml−1 ddH2O, pH 7.2) with
2 μg of total DNA, vortexing for 5 s and incubating for
15 min at 22 °C. Before transfection, the hIPSCs-derived
pancreatic progenitor cells were dissociated using 0.5 ml of StemPro
Accutase Cell Dissociation Reagent (Invitrogen) and reseeded into 12-well
plates. For the transfection, 3 μg of total DNA was transfected
into cells cultivated in each well of a 12-well plate using Lipofectamine LTX
Reagent with PLUS Reagent (Invitrogen). The plasmids (pCI-MOR9-1;
pSP1; pSP12; pSP17) were co-transfected at a ratio of
1:1:1:1 for hIPSCs (1:0.01:1:1 for hMSC-TERT). The transfection efficiency was
determined via FACS analysis using pEGFP-N1-transfected, randomly
differentiating cells as a control (Supplementary Fig. 10). Randomly differentiating or
lineage-controlled hIPSC-derived pancreatic progenitor cell populations (day 11)
were prepared for transfection by dissociating the cells with 0.5 ml of
StemPro Accutase Cell Dissociation Reagent (Invitrogen), seeded into the wells
of a 12-well plate and cultivated for 4 h in 1 ml RPMI
(Invitrogen) containing 10% FCS and supplemented with 10 μM
Y-27632, 11 mM glucose, 400 μM vanillic acid
(Sigma-Aldrich), 50 ng ml−1 exendin-4 (Tocris
Bioscience), 10 mM nicotinamide (Sigma-Aldrich) and 40 μM
β-mercaptoethanol. Subsequently, the culture medium was replaced by the
same supplemented RPMI devoid of Y-27632 and the cells were transfected with
3 μg pSP26
(PhINS-DsRed-Express-pASV40) using Lipofectamine LTX
with Plus Reagent (Invitrogen). For FACS-mediated single-cell sorting of the
lineage- and growth-factor/chemical-controlled beta-like cells (day 11),
hIPSC-derived pancreatic progenitor cells (day 0) were co-transfected with
3 μg of total DNA (pCI-MOR9-1, pSP1, pSP12,
pSP17, pEGFP-N1, pSP26; for the lineage-control
network; pEGFP-N1, pSP26 for the growth-factor/chemical-based
differentiation technique). The parental vector pcDNA3.1(+) was used as a
filler plasmid when replacing functional components for control purposes. For
the dose–response experiments, the transfected cells were trypsinized
(200 μl trypsin, 5 min, 37 °C; PAN Biotech) and
transferred into the wells of a 96-well plate (104 cells per
well) containing 100 μl DMEM supplemented with different
concentrations of vanillic acid. SEAP expression was profiled after 48 h.
To compare vanillic acid-triggered lineage control with independent expression
control of the pancreatic transcription factors Ngn3, Pdx1, MafA by different
antibiotic-responsive gene switches, we co-transfected hMSC-TERT with
pCI-MOR9-1, pSP1, pSP12 and pSP17 for the
lineage-control network, with pWW35, pSP36, pMF156 and
pSP39 for macrolide-responsive Pdx1 and MafA (EOFF) as
well as streptogramin-responsive Ngn3 expression (PIPOFF) or with
pWW35, pSP37, pMF156, pSP39, pTet-ON and
pSP4 for macrolide-responsive Pdx1 (EOFF),
streptogramin-responsive Ngn3 (PIPOFF) and tetracycline-responsive
MafA (TETON) expression, and incubated the cells in the presence of
vanillic acid (2 μM medium concentration, 400 μM
high concentration), erythromycin (1 μM; Sigma-Aldrich),
doxycycline (1 μM; Sigma-Aldrich) or pristinamycin (Pyostacin,
1 μM; Sanofi-Aventis Inc.).
Differentiation of hIPSCs
The hIPSCs were differentiated to pancreatic progenitor cells and beta-like cells
using the growth-factor/chemical-based differentiation techniques described
below3233345560. Step 1 (endoderm cells): Human
pluripotent stem cells (80–90% confluence) were washed with 1
× PBS and cultivated for 24 h in RPMI containing Activin A
(100 ng ml−1) and Wnt3A
(25 ng ml−1). Then, the cells were
cultivated for another 48 h in RPMI containing Activin A
(100 ng ml−1), bFGF
(5 ng ml−1), BMP-4
(0.25 ng ml−1) and VEGF165
(10 ng ml−1). Subsequently, the cells
were cultivated for another 48 h in serum-free differentiation (SFD)
medium (75% Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium, 25%
Ham's F-12, 0.5 × N2 supplement, 0.5 × vitamin A-free
B−27 serum-free supplement, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, ascorbic
acid (50 μg ml−1), 1-thioglycerol
(0.45 μM)) containing Activin A
(100 ng ml−1), bFGF
(5 ng ml−1), BMP-4
(0.25 ng ml−1) and VEGF165
(10 ng ml−1). Step 2 (primitive gut tube
cells): The endoderm cells resulting from step 1 were cultivated for 72 h
in SFD medium containing Wnt3A (3 ng ml−1),
Noggin (50 ng ml−1) and FGF-10
(50 ng ml−1). Step 3 (pancreatic
progenitor cells): The primitive gut tube cells resulting from step 2 were
cultivated for 72 h in DMEM containing 1% (vol/vol) vitamin A-free
B−27 serum-free supplement, ascorbic acid
(50 μg ml−1), KAAD-cyclopamine
(0.25 μM), retinoic acid (2 μM) and FGF-10
(50 ng ml−1). Step 4 (pancreatic
progenitor cells): The pancreatic progenitor cells resulting from step 3 were
cultivated for 72 h in DMEM containing 1% (vol/vol) vitamin A-free
B−27 serum-free supplement, ascorbic acid
(50 μg ml−1), retinoic acid
(100 nM), FGF-7 (50 ng ml−1) and
epidermal growth factor (EGF; 50 ng ml−1).
Step 5 (endocrine progenitor cells): The pancreatic progenitor cells resulting
from step 4 were treated for 4 h with Y-27632 (10 μM),
dissociated for 5 min using 0.5 ml of StemPro Accutase and
incubated for 72 h in suspension plates to facilitate the formation of
aggregates in DMEM containing 1% (vol/vol) vitamin A-free B−27
serum-free supplement, ascorbic acid
(50 μg ml−1), retinoic acid
(50 nM), thyroid hormone T3 (1 μM), Alk5 inhibitor
(10 μM), Noggin (50 ng ml−1),
KAAD-cyclopamine (0.25 μM) and gamma secretase inhibitor
(1 μM). Step 6 (maturing beta-like cells): The endocrine
progenitor cells resulting from step 5 were cultivated for 72 h in DMEM
containing 1% (vol/vol) vitamin A-free B−27 serum-free supplement,
ascorbic acid (50 μg ml−1), retinoic
acid (25 nM), thyroid hormone T3 (1 μM), Noggin
(50 ng ml−1), Alk5 inhibitor
(10 μM) and gamma secretase inhibitor (1 μM). Step 7
(beta-like cells): The maturing beta-like cells resulting from step 6 were
cultivated for 5 days in low-glucose DMEM (5 mM glucose) supplemented
with 10% (vol/vol) FCS and containing 1 × non-essential amino acid
solution, thyroid hormone T3 (1 μM) and Alk5 inhibitor
(10 μM). For the lineage-control network, 12-well suspension
plates (Greiner Bio-one GmbH.) were used from day 0 onwards and hIPSC-derived
endodermal cells were cultivated in noggin- and gamma-secretase inhibitor-free
culture medium (to prevent premature endocrine differentiation before
transfection of the lineage-control network) supplemented with epidermal growth
factor (to trigger expression of Nkx6.1 in pancreatic progenitor cells). After
dissociation and transfection of the pancreatic progenitor cells with the
lineage-control network, the engineered cells spontaneously form aggregates and
following addition of thyroid hormone T3 (triiodothyronine) and retinoic acid
they differentiate into endocrine progenitor cells and mature into beta-like
cells following addition of Alk5 inhibitor (Supplementary Fig. 1). Randomly
differentiating pancreatic progenitor cells were cultivated in DMEM supplemented
with 10% (vol/vol) KnockOut Serum Replacement (KOSR) for 4 days and then
for 7 days in SFD supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) KOSR. Roswell Park
Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 culture medium, Iscove's modified
Dulbecco's medium, Ham's F12 nutrient mixture, Vitamin A-free
B−27 serum-free supplement, N-2 supplement, human bFGF, KOSR,
non-essential amino-acid solution, PBS and StemPro Accutase cell dissociation
reagent were purchased from Invitrogen. Human BMP4, the sonic hedgehog
antagonist KAAD-Cyclopamine, human Noggin, human EGF, human fibroblast growth
factor 7/10 (FGF-7/FGF-10) and human VEGF165 were obtained from
Miltenyi Biotec. Human Activin A, wingless-type MMTV integration site family
member 3A (Wnt3A), vanillic acid, ascorbic acid, bovine serum albumin,
1-thioglycerol, thyroid hormone T3 and retinoic acid were purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich. The gamma secretase inhibitor L-685,458 was obtained from Tocris
Bioscience, Rock inhibitor Y-27632 was obtained from STEMCELL Technologies and
Alk5 inhibitor was obtained from Enzo Lifesciences.
Immunocytochemistry
At different time points of the differentiation (endoderm cells; pancreatic
progenitor cells, endocrine progenitor cells; pancreatic beta-like cells; Supplementary Fig. 1),
network-containing hIPSCs cultivated in 12-well plates were fixed with 4%
(wt/vol) paraformaldehyde solution overnight at 4 °C. The fixed cells
were permeabilized with 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 solution and then
incubated with blocking solution (10% (vol/vol) goat serum in PBS) for
1 h at 37 °C followed by
4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole-mediated staining of the cell nuclei
(Vectashield; Vector Labs). The samples were immunostained for 1 h at
37 °C using primary antibodies specific for Sox17 and Fox A2
(endoderm cells), Pdx1, Nkx6-1 (pancreatic progenitor cells), Ngn3, Pdx1 and
VP16 (endocrine progenitor cells) and insulin (C-peptide), VP16, Pdx1, MafA,
glucagon and somatostatin (pancreatic beta-like cells), washed three times in
0.1% Tween-20 and incubated for 1 h with appropriate
fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies before immunofluorescence was
visualized with a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope (Nikon AG) using the appropriate
excitation/emission wavelengths. The primary antibodies utilized in this study
included mouse anti-Sox17 IgG (MAB19241, lot no. C614013; dilution 1:1,000;
R&D Systems Europe), rabbit anti-FoxA2 IgG (AB4125, lot no. NMM1757191;
dilution 1:1,000; Millipore), rabbit anti-VP16 IgG (ab4808, lot no. 830675;
dilution 1:200; Abcam), mouse anti-Ngn3 IgG (F25A1B3, lot no. GR95038; dilution
1:100; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), mouse anti-Pdx1 IgG (MAB2419, lot
no. C267712; dilution 1:2,000; R&D Systems), rabbit anti-MafA IgG (sc-66958,
lot no. C1609; dilution 1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rat anti-C-peptide IgG
(GN-ID4, lot no. 10510; dilution 1:50; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank),
goat anti-glucagon IgG (sc-7779, lot no. E2112; dilution 1:200; Santa Cruz
Biotechnology), mouse anti-somatostatin IgG (sc-74556, lot no. J2708; dilution
1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and rat anti-Nkx6-1 IgG (F55A12-s, dilution
1:200; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank). The secondary antibodies utilized
in this study included fluorescein (FITC)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG
(AP124F, lot no. LV1688510; dilution 1:1,000), rhodamine-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit IgG (AP307R, lot no. LV1441875; dilution 1:1,000) from Millipore
Inc, donkey anti-goat IgG (sc-3860, lot no. G1712; dilution 1:400) and
fluorescein (FITC)-conjugated chicken anti-rat IgG (sc-2991, lot no. K2912;
dilution 1:400) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
Analytical assays
The production of human placental SEAP was quantified in cell culture
supernatants using a p-nitrophenylphosphate-based light absorbance time
course69. Activity of Gaussia princeps Luciferase was
quantified using a BioLux Gaussia Luciferase Assay Kit (New England
Biolabs Inc.). The activity of Photinus pyralis firefly luciferase (FLuc)
was quantified using a Luciferase Assay System (Promega).
Quantitative RT–PCR
Total RNA of lineage-controlled hIPSC population, FACS-sorted hIPSC-derived
beta-like cells, engineered hMSC-TERT and human islets was isolated using the ZR
RNA MiniPrep kit (Zymo Research) and TURBO DNase (Invitrogen). qRT–PCR
with total RNA was performed using SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase
(Invitrogen) and TaqMan Fast Advanced Mastermix (Invitrogen) with the
corresponding TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Supplementary Table 2) or SYBR Green PCR
Mastermix with custom-designed primers (Supplementary Table 3). qRT–PCR with total RNA of FACS-sorted
hIPSC-derived beta-like cells and human islets was performed using High-Capacity
cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Invitrogen) and Taqman PreAmp Mastermix Kit
(Invitrogen) with the corresponding TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Supplementary Table 2). The Eppendorf
Realplex Mastercycler (Eppendorf GmbH) was set to the following amplification
parameters: 2 min at 50 °C, 20 s at 95 °C
and 40 cycles of 1 s at 95 °C followed by 1 min at
60 °C. The relative threshold cycle (Ct) was
determined and normalized to the endogenous glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate
dehydrogenase transcript. The fold change for each transcript relative to the
control was calculated using the comparative Ct method70.
FACS-mediated analysis and single-cell sorting
For FACS-mediated analysis and single-cell sorting of randomly differentiating
and lineage-controlled hIPSC-derived beta-like cells (day 11), the cell
populations was co-transfected with pSP26
(PhINS-DsRed-Express-pASV40) and the resulting
beta-like cells were sorted (day 14) using a Becton Dickinson LSRII Fortessa
flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) equipped for DsRed (561 nm laser,
570 nm long-pass filter, 586/15 emission filter) detection. For
FACS-mediated analysis and single-cell sorting of hIPSC-derived beta-like cells
differentiated using the growth-factor/chemical-based differentiation technique
(day 11), the respective treated population (day 0) was co-transfected with
3 μg of total DNA (pCI-MOR9-1, pSP1, pSP12,
pSP17, pEGFP-N1, pSP26) for the lineage-control
network; (pEGFP-N1, pSP26) for the growth-factor/chemical-based
differentiation technique and the resulting beta-like cells were sorted using
DsRed (561 nm laser, 570 nm long-pass filter, 586/15 emission
filter) detection and EGFP (488 nm laser, 505 nm long-pass filter,
530/30 emission filter) detection while excluding dead cells and cell doublets.
Total RNA extracted from the sorted beta-like cells was used for qRT–PCR.
For FACS analysis, we used the same antibodies and dilutions as for
immunostaining. In brief, cells were detached (1 × 106
cells per ml) using 0.5 ml StemPro Accutase Cell Dissociation Reagent
(Invitrogen) and fixed with 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde in PBS overnight
at 4 °C, permeabilized for 10 min with 0.1% (vol/vol)
Triton X-100, washed once in 2 ml PBS and sequentially labelled for
1 h at 37 °C with specific primary and secondary antibodies,
with a PBS washing step in between. The cell populations were analysed using a
Becton Dickinson LSRII Fortessa flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) equipped for
EGFP (488 nm laser, 505 nm long-pass filter, 530/30 emission
filter), DsRed (561 nm laser, 570 nm long-pass filter, 586/15
emission filter) or allophycocyanin (ACP, 633 nM laser, 670/14 emission
filter) detection and set to exclude dead cells and cell doublets. Unstained
cell populations were used as negative controls.
Transmission electron microscopy
Human islets and beta-like cells differentiated using the lineage-control network
(day 11) were dissociated into single cells using 0.5 ml of StemPro
Accutase Cell Dissociation Reagent (Invitrogen) and prepared for
electron-microscopic analysis using a standard procedure34. In
brief, after embedding the cell pellets in EMbed 812 resin (Electron Microscopy
Sciences), serial 70 nm sections were collected on formvar-coated copper
slot grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and micrographs were taken using a
FEI/Philips CM-10 transmission electron microscope (FEI/Philips) equipped with a
2k × 2k CCD Veleta camera (EMSIS, GmbH).
Quantification of glucose responsiveness
Human islets and beta-like cells either differentiated by the synthetic
lineage-control network or using the growth-factor/chemical-based
differentiation technique (day 11) were washed in 0.25 ml Krebs-Ringer
Bicarbonate Buffer (129 mM NaCl, 5 mM NaHCO3,
4.8 mM KCl, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 1.2 mM
MgSO4, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES, pH
7.4; Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated for 30 min in low-glucose
(Sigma-Aldrich; 2.8 mM) Krebs-Ringer Bicarbonate Buffer supplemented with
100 μM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (Sigma-Aldrich). The culture
was then switched to intermediate glucose (10 mM) for 30 min and
then high-glucose (20 mM) Krebs-Ringer Bicarbonate Buffer for another
30 min. Thereafter, the culture was switched to high-glucose
(20 mM) and KCl (30 mM)-supplemented Krebs-Ringer Bicarbonate
Buffer for another 30 min. The intracellular (released via cell lysis for
5 min at 22 °C in M-PER protein lysis buffer; Thermo
Scientific) and secreted isoforms of the connecting peptide (C-peptide) produced
during proinsulin processing were quantified using the ultrasensitive human
C-peptide ELISA (lot no. 21899; Mercodia). The values were normalized to the
total intracellular protein content and the number of glucose-sensitive
insulin-secreting cells using a Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
For the extended culture, beta-like cells (day 11) were continuously cultivated
for 4 weeks in DMEM (Invitrogen) containing 10% (vol/vol) FCS,
5 mM glucose, 400 μM vanillic acid (Sigma-Aldrich),
1 μM thyroid hormone T3 (Sigma-Aldrich) and 10 μM
Alk5 inhibitor before glucose-stimulated insulin release was quantified.
Statistical analyses
All data represent the means±s.d. of three independent experiments with
two or three samples per experiment. Group comparisons were analysed by the
Student's t-test (cutoff of P<0.05) using GraphPad Prism
6 software (GraphPad Software Inc.).
Additional information
How to cite this article: Saxena, P. et al. A programmable synthetic
lineage-control network that differentiates human IPSCs into glucose-sensitive
insulin-secreting beta-like cells. Nat. Commun. 7:11247 doi:
10.1038/ncomms11247 (2016).
Authors: Hung Ping Shih; Janel L Kopp; Manbir Sandhu; Claire L Dubois; Philip A Seymour; Anne Grapin-Botton; Maike Sander Journal: Development Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Andrew M Posselt; Gregory L Szot; Lynda A Frassetto; Umesh Masharani; Mehdi Tavakol; Raj Amin; Joan McElroy; Marissa D Ramos; Robert K Kerlan; Lawrence Fong; Flavio Vincenti; Jeffrey A Bluestone; Peter G Stock Journal: Transplantation Date: 2010-12-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: M Cristina Nostro; Farida Sarangi; Shinichiro Ogawa; Audrey Holtzinger; Barbara Corneo; Xueling Li; Suzanne J Micallef; In-Hyun Park; Christina Basford; Michael B Wheeler; George Q Daley; Andrew G Elefanty; Edouard G Stanley; Gordon Keller Journal: Development Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: N A Turgeon; J G Avila; J A Cano; J J Hutchinson; I R Badell; A J Page; A B Adams; M H Sears; P H Bowen; A D Kirk; T C Pearson; C P Larsen Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Marc Gitzinger; Christian Kemmer; David A Fluri; Marie Daoud El-Baba; Wilfried Weber; Martin Fussenegger Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2011-12-19 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Linda Sommese; Alberto Zullo; Francesco Paolo Mancini; Rossella Fabbricini; Andrea Soricelli; Claudio Napoli Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Ayesha Aijaz; Matthew Li; David Smith; Danika Khong; Courtney LeBlon; Owen S Fenton; Ronke M Olabisi; Steven Libutti; Jay Tischfield; Marcela V Maus; Robert Deans; Rita N Barcia; Daniel G Anderson; Jerome Ritz; Robert Preti; Biju Parekkadan Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2018-06-11 Impact factor: 25.671