Literature DB >> 27062316

Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast cancer phenotype, ER/PR and HER2 expression - Implications for the practising oncologist.

Renu Gahlaut1, Aneliese Bennett1, Hiba Fatayer2, Barbara J Dall3, Nisha Sharma3, Galina Velikova4, Tim Perren5, David Dodwell4, Mark Lansdown2, Abeer M Shaaban6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on breast cancer characteristics, hormone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression and whether testing should be repeated on residual tumours.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with primary operable breast cancer who received NACT at a single United Kingdom tertiary referral centre were included. Tumour type, grade (including details of mitotic grade, tubule formation and pleomorphism), oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 status were compared between pre-treatment and post-treatment residual samples using tissue microarrays. A control group of paired core and excision tumours from patients who did not receive NACT was also assessed.
RESULTS: Two hundred forty-six cases and 113 controls were included. Pathological complete response (path CR) was achieved in 21.5% of patients. In those patients failing to achieve a path CR, a change in the histological type was noted in 29 out of 178 cases (16.3%, p<0.001) with increase in the lobular and metaplastic types. Downgrading occurred in 28.8%, due to significant reduction in mitotic rate and prominent tubule formation. A change in ER/PR/HER2 status occurred in 12%, 14.5% and 7.1% of cases, respectively, predominantly as a switch from negative to positive status for ER and from positive to negative status for HER2. Further alterations in expression levels were also noted. Minimal changes in the low ER/PR expressors and the HER2 2+ tumours were found in the control group.
CONCLUSION: Significant changes in tumour morphology, grade, hormone receptors and HER2 status occur following NACT. We recommend testing on residual invasive carcinoma. A switch from negative to positive status warrants offering endocrine/trastuzumab-based therapy to this group of patients.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; HER2; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Oestrogen receptor; Progesterone receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27062316     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  15 in total

Review 1.  Applying the New Guidelines of HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Huina Zhang; Ioana Moisini; Rana M Ajabnoor; Bradley M Turner; David G Hicks
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Cross-Resistance Among Sequential Cancer Therapeutics: An Emerging Issue.

Authors:  Rossella Loria; Patrizia Vici; Francesca Sofia Di Lisa; Silvia Soddu; Marcello Maugeri-Saccà; Giulia Bon
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Comparison of strain and shear-wave ultrasounic elastography in predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Shuo Zhang; Jing Li; Jianyi Li; Ye Kang; Weidong Ren
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Effects of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Benign Breast Lesions Compared to Cancers: Should an Additional Lesion on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Responding Similar to Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy be Viewed with Suspicion?

Authors:  Rebecca Leddy; Abid Irshad; Lara Hewett; Heather Collins; Frank Vento; Susan Ackerman; Madelene Lewis
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2016-09-20

5.  The calpain system is associated with survival of breast cancer patients with large but operable inflammatory and non-inflammatory tumours treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sarah J Storr; Siwei Zhang; Tim Perren; Mark Lansdown; Hiba Fatayer; Nisha Sharma; Renu Gahlaut; Abeer Shaaban; Stewart G Martin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-26

6.  Effect of neoadjuvant therapy on breast cancer biomarker profile.

Authors:  Laura Rey-Vargas; Juan Carlos Mejía-Henao; María Carolina Sanabria-Salas; Silvia J Serrano-Gomez
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Negative Conversion of Progesterone Receptor Status after Primary Systemic Therapy Is Associated with Poor Clinical Outcome in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Soomin Ahn; Hyun Jeong Kim; Milim Kim; Yul Ri Chung; Eunyoung Kang; Eun-Kyu Kim; Se Hyun Kim; Yu Jung Kim; Jee Hyun Kim; In Ah Kim; So Yeon Park
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.679

8.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduces the expression rates of ER, PR, HER2, Ki67, and P53 of invasive ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jian-Heng Peng; Xiang Zhang; Jun-Long Song; Liang Ran; Rong Luo; Hong-Yuan Li; Yong-Hong Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Effects of core needle biopsy and subsequent neoadjuvant chemotherapy on molecular alterations and outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lingmin Xie; Xiaolei Li; Qinchuan Wang; Jichun Zhou; Jun Shen; Lixi Luo; Yi Lu; Linbo Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Correlation between the dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI features and prognostic factors in breast cancer: A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Weijing Tao; Chunhong Hu; Genji Bai; Yan Zhu; Yaning Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.