Literature DB >> 27061472

Sound exposure changes European seabass behaviour in a large outdoor floating pen: Effects of temporal structure and a ramp-up procedure.

Y Y Neo1, J Hubert2, L Bolle3, H V Winter3, C Ten Cate2, H Slabbekoorn2.   

Abstract

Underwater sound from human activities may affect fish behaviour negatively and threaten the stability of fish stocks. However, some fundamental understanding is still lacking for adequate impact assessments and potential mitigation strategies. For example, little is known about the potential contribution of the temporal features of sound, the efficacy of ramp-up procedures, and the generalisability of results from indoor studies to the outdoors. Using a semi-natural set-up, we exposed European seabass in an outdoor pen to four treatments: 1) continuous sound, 2) intermittent sound with a regular repetition interval, 3) irregular repetition intervals and 4) a regular repetition interval with amplitude 'ramp-up'. Upon sound exposure, the fish increased swimming speed and depth, and swam away from the sound source. The behavioural readouts were generally consistent with earlier indoor experiments, but the changes and recovery were more variable and were not significantly influenced by sound intermittency and interval regularity. In addition, the 'ramp-up' procedure elicited immediate diving response, similar to the onset of treatment without a 'ramp-up', but the fish did not swim away from the sound source as expected. Our findings suggest that while sound impact studies outdoors increase ecological and behavioural validity, the inherently higher variability also reduces resolution that may be counteracted by increasing sample size or looking into different individual coping styles. Our results also question the efficacy of 'ramp-up' in deterring marine animals, which warrants more investigation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropogenic noise; Dicentrarchus labrax; Field study; Fish behaviour; Sound characteristics; Stress response

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27061472     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  4 in total

Review 1.  Aquatic noise pollution: implications for individuals, populations, and ecosystems.

Authors:  Hansjoerg P Kunc; Kirsty Elizabeth McLaughlin; Rouven Schmidt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Shipbuilding Docks as Experimental Systems for Realistic Assessments of Anthropogenic Stressors on Marine Organisms.

Authors:  Rick Bruintjes; Harry R Harding; Tom Bunce; Fiona Birch; Jessica Lister; Ilaria Spiga; Tom Benson; Kate Rossington; Diane Jones; Charles R Tyler; Andrew N Radford; Stephen D Simpson
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 8.589

3.  Continuous but not intermittent noise has a negative impact on mating success in a marine fish with paternal care.

Authors:  Eva-Lotta Blom; Charlotta Kvarnemo; Isabelle Dekhla; Sofie Schöld; Mathias H Andersson; Ola Svensson; M Clara P Amorim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Impact of noise on development, physiological stress and behavioural patterns in larval zebrafish.

Authors:  Rafael A Lara; Raquel O Vasconcelos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.